The Effects of Coffee and Energy Drink on Color Stability of Hybrid Ceramics

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the color stability of two different hybrid ceramic materials.
Materials & Methods: Using the precision cutting device (Micracut, Metcon, Turkey), 36 specimens (12 x 15 x 1 mm) were obtained from Vita Enamic (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) and Lava Ultimate (3M ESPE, St.Paul, USA) CAD / CAM blocks. After finishing procedures were completed, all specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h. Then, the specimens were dried and the initial color measurements were made. L, a, b values were determined using a spectrophotometer (Vita Easy Shade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). The specimens were then divided into 3 test groups and stored in coffee (Nescafe Classic, Turkey) (G2, G5), energy drink (Red Bull, Austria) (G3, G6), and in the distilled water as the control group (G1, G4), for 48 h. After 48 h, the specimens were washed with distilled water and dried. Second color measurements were made. ∆E00 values were calculated using the CIEDE 2000 color-difference formula.
Results: Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were made with Bonferroni’s test. There was a statistically significant difference between 2 ceramics (p=0.035). Generally, Lava Ultimate showed more color change than Vita Enamic. Among the beverages, coffee was significantly different for both ceramics than control and energy drink (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Lava Ultimate, showed more color change than Vita Enamic. Coffee has also been determined as the most colorant drink for both hybrid ceramics.

Keywords

• CIEDE 2000
• color stability
• hybrid ceramic
• resin nanoceramic

References

1. 1. FasbinderDJ,DennisonJB,HeysD,NeivaG.Aclinicaleval- uation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns: a two-year report. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141 Suppl 2:10s–4s. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0355.
2. 2. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Struc- tural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent. 2000;28(7):529–35. doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00030-0.
3. 3. Dundar M, Gungor MA, Cal E. Multidisciplinary ap- proach to restoring anterior maxillary partial edentu- lous area using an IPS Empress 2 fixed partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(4):327–30. doi:10.1067/mpr.2003.80.
4. 4. Senyılmaz P, Ciftci Y, Canay S, Siranlı A. Full ceramic restorations. Akademik Dental Diş Hekimliği Dergisi. 2004;6(2):32–37.
5. 5. Vita Zahnfabrik website [Journal Article]; 2021. Avail- able from: https://www.vita- zahnfabrik.com/en/ VITA- ENAMIC- 24970.
6. 6. Büyükdere A, Yenice N. All Ceramics blocks used in Cad/Cam systems and indications. Dent & Med J - R. 2020;2(1):1–15.
7. 7. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical prop- erties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29(4):419–26. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002.
8. 8. Güngör MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, Ünver S, Doğan A. Ef- fect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hy- brid materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(4):259–66. doi:10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.259.

9. 9. Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Pereira GKR, Segala RD, Klev- erlaan CJ, Valandro LF. Fatigue performance of adhe- sively cemented glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic mate- rials for CAD/CAM monolithic restorations. Dent Mater. 2019;35(4):534–542. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.013.
10. 10. 3M Espe, Lava Ultimate [Web Paige]; 2021. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/3zr9cadb.
11. 11. Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H, Nicholson JW. Buffer- ing and ion-release by a glass-ionomer cement un- der near-neutral and acidic conditions. Biomaterials. 2002;23(13):2783–8. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00014-5.
12. 12. Hamouda IM. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23(5):315–22. doi:10.1111/j.1708- 8240.2011.00453.x.
13. 13. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero D. The role of diet in the aetiol- ogy of dental erosion. Caries Res. 2004;38 Suppl 1:34–44. doi:10.1159/000074360.
14. 14. Mante MO, Saleh N, Tanna NK, Mante FK. Softening pat- terns of light cured glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1999;15(5):303–9. doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00044-5.
15. 15. McKenzie MA, Linden RW, Nicholson JW. The physi- cal properties of conventional and resin-modified glass- ionomer dental cements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages, saline and water. Biomaterials. 2003;24(22):4063–9. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00282-5.
16. 16. International Coffee Organization [Web Paige]; 2021. Available from: https:// icocoffeeorg.tumblr.com/post/147286923545/ coffee- consumption- increases- as- market- hits.
17. 17. Yılmaz E, Oraman G, Özdemir G, Arap S, Yılmaz I. Turkish coffee comsumption trends and determination of consumer characteristics [Oral Presentation]. 12th National Agricultural Economics Congress. 2016;25-27 May,(Isparta,):p. 457.
18. 18. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, John- ston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocom- posite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(1):71–5. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.014.
19. 19. Güler AU, Güler E, Yücel AC, Ertaş E. Effects of pol- ishing procedures on color stability of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(2):108–12. doi:10.1590/s1678- 77572009000200007.
20. 20. Sarikaya I, Gulec C. Estetik restoratif cad/cam materyallerin translusensi ve renk stabilitesinin degerlendirilmesi. Atatürk univ dis hekim fak derg;28(3):365–370. (CIE) CIdl. CIE technical report: colorimetry. [CIE Pub No15 98.
21. 21. (CIE) CIdl. CIE technical report: colorimetry. [CIE Pub No15 98. 3]. 2004.
22. 22. Commision Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) [Web Paige]; 2021. Available from: http://cie.co.at/publications/ colorimetry- part- 6- ciede2000- colour- difference- formula.
23. 23. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(3):193–9. doi:10.1016/s0022- 3913(09)60028-7.
24. 24. Ragain J J C, Johnston WM. Minimum color differ- ences for discriminating mismatch between composite and tooth color. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13(1):41–8. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00250.x.
25. 25. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):97–108. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018.
26. 26. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in den- tistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S1–9. doi:10.1111/jerd.12149.
27. 27. Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e57–64. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008.
28. 28. Gawriołek M, Sikorska E, Ferreira LF, Costa AI, Khmelinskii I, Krawczyk A, et al. Color and luminescence stability of selected dental materials in vitro. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(2):112–22. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00808.x.
29. 29. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Char- acterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic- network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):564–9.
30. 30. Vasudeva G. Monomer systems for dental composites and their future: a review. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2009;37(6):389–98
31. 31. Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):424–32. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.003.
32. 32. Gajewski VE, Pfeifer CS, Fróes-Salgado NR, Boaro LC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites: de- gree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(5):508–14. doi:10.1590/s0103-64402012000500007.
33. 33. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food- simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibil- ity to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005;33(5):389–98. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.018.
34. 34. Al-Dharrab A. Effect of energy drinks on the color stabil- ity of nanofilled composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(4):704–11. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1388.
35. 35. Choi JW, Lee MJ, Oh SH, Kim KM. Changes in the phys- ical properties and color stability of aesthetic restorative materials caused by various beverages. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(1):33–40. doi:10.4012/dmj.2017-247.
36. 36. Ramalho LO, de Souza Oliveira LP, Valente LD, Cohen- Carneiro F, Regalado DF, Pontes DG. Effect of hydroelec- trolytic and energy beverages on the color stability and flu- orescence of composite resins. Gen Dent. 2021;69(2):40–46
37. 37. Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, Sagsoz NP, Yildiz M. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining re- sistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(6):417–422. doi:10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.417.