EN
Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Purpose: We aim to compare the scalpel and diode laser methods in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation in terms of postoperative pain and wound healing.
Materials & Methods: Sixteen systemically healthy individuals requesting treatment for light or moderate gingival hyperpigmentation were enrolled for this study. The individuals were randomly assigned to treatment with the diode laser method or conventional scalpel method. Dummett oral pigmentation index was recorded at baseline. The VAS form was given to the individuals and postoperative pain and wound healing were compared on the postoperative 7th day. Comparisons between the groups were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test and P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The scalpel group showed total epithelialization, however, the laser group showed incomplete epithelialization. The scalpel group declared significantly higher pain perception in comparison to the laser group on the first and second days after the surgery (p=0,002 and p=0,038, respectively). No significant differences were found between the groups on the fourth and seventh day regarding pain perception (p>0,05). Also, no significant difference was observed in any comparisons between the pain perceptions of female and male individuals (p>0,05).
Conclusion: Both scalpel and diode laser are obtained successful clinical results in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation. Although increased chair-time and impaired wound healing at one-week follow-up, intraoperative homeostasis and relatively less postoperative pain reveal the superiority of diode laser to the scalpel. The choice of the method may vary depending on the available equipment and preference of the patient and the clinician.
Keywords
References
- Referans1 Cicek Y, Ertas U. The normal and pathological pigmentation of oral mucous membrane: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003;4(3):76-86.
- Referans2 Lenane P, Powell FC. Oral pigmentation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(6):448-65.
- Referans3 Sarswathi TR, Kumar SN, Kavitha KM. Oral melanin pigmentation in smoked and smokeless tobacco users in India. Clinico-pathological study. Indian J Dent Res. 2003;14(2):101-6.
- Referans4 Hedin CA, Axell T. Oral melanin pigmentation in 467 Thai and Malaysian people with special emphasis on smoker's melanosis. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20(1):8-12.
- Referans5 Alhabashneh R, Darawi O, Khader YS, Ashour L. Gingival depigmentation using Er:YAG laser and scalpel technique: A six-month prospective clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(2):113-22.
- Referans6 Namdeoraoji Bahadure R, Singh P, Jain E, Khurana H, Badole G. Management of pigmented gingiva in child patient: a new era to the pediatric dentistry. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6(3):197-200.
- Referans7 Tal H, Landsberg J, Kozlovsky A. Cryosurgical depigmentation of the gingiva. A case report. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14(10):614-7.
- Referans8 Rahmati S, Darijani M, Nourelahi M. Comparison of surgical blade and cryosurgery with liquid nitrogen techniques in treatment of physiologic gingival pigmentation: short term results. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014;15(4):161-6.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Dentistry
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 31, 2021
Submission Date
July 1, 2021
Acceptance Date
December 1, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 48 Number: 3
APA
Koca-ünsal, R. B., Kasnak, G., & Firatli, E. (2021). Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation. European Annals of Dental Sciences, 48(3), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0030
AMA
1.Koca-ünsal RB, Kasnak G, Firatli E. Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation. EADS. 2021;48(3):95-100. doi:10.52037/eads.2021.0030
Chicago
Koca-ünsal, Revan Birke, Gökhan Kasnak, and Erhan Firatli. 2021. “Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation”. European Annals of Dental Sciences 48 (3): 95-100. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0030.
EndNote
Koca-ünsal RB, Kasnak G, Firatli E (December 1, 2021) Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation. European Annals of Dental Sciences 48 3 95–100.
IEEE
[1]R. B. Koca-ünsal, G. Kasnak, and E. Firatli, “Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation”, EADS, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 95–100, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.52037/eads.2021.0030.
ISNAD
Koca-ünsal, Revan Birke - Kasnak, Gökhan - Firatli, Erhan. “Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation”. European Annals of Dental Sciences 48/3 (December 1, 2021): 95-100. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0030.
JAMA
1.Koca-ünsal RB, Kasnak G, Firatli E. Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation. EADS. 2021;48:95–100.
MLA
Koca-ünsal, Revan Birke, et al. “Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation”. European Annals of Dental Sciences, vol. 48, no. 3, Dec. 2021, pp. 95-100, doi:10.52037/eads.2021.0030.
Vancouver
1.Revan Birke Koca-ünsal, Gökhan Kasnak, Erhan Firatli. Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation. EADS. 2021 Dec. 1;48(3):95-100. doi:10.52037/eads.2021.0030