KARIŞIK DİŞLENME DÖNEMİNDE SÜRMEMİŞ KANİN VE PREMOLAR DİŞLERİN MEZİYO-DİSTAL GENİŞLİKLERİNİN TAHMİNİNDE KULLANILAN FARKLI ANALİZ YÖNTEMLERİNİN GÜVENİLİRLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı karışık dişlenme döneminde sıklıkla kullanılan üç farklı analiz yönteminin güvenirliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Materyal-metod: Bu araştırma Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı arşivinde yer alan, birinci molar dişlere kadar tüm daimi dişleri sürmüş, 12-22 yaşları arasındaki 147 bireyin alçı modelleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Çalışma modelleri üzerinde gerekli dişlerin meziyo-distal boyutları 0.01 mm hassasiyete sahip dijital kumpas kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Sürmemiş kanin ve premolar dişlerin meziyo-distal boyutlarının tahmininde Moyers olasılık tablosu, Tanaka-Johnston denklemi, Bernabe ve Floris-Mir regresyon eşitliği kullanılmıştır. Cinsiyet ve dental arklar arasında diş boyutlarının karşılaştırılmasında Student t testi kullanılmıştır. Kanin ve premolar dişlerin tahmini boyutları için denklemlerin belirlenmesinde lineer regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Tüm gruplarda Bernabe ve FlorisMir regresyon eşitliği ve Tanaka-Johnston denklemiyle belirlenen tahmini boyutların gerçek boyutlardan daha fazla olduğu belirlenmiştir. Kadınlarda üst çenede Moyers %75, alt çenede Moyers %50 olasılık tablosu; erkeklerde üst çene ve alt çenede Moyers %50 olasılık tablosuyla belirlenen tahmini boyutlarla gerçek boyutlar arasındaki farkın ise istatistik olarak anlamlı olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Kadınlarda üst çenede Moyers %75, alt çenede Moyers %50; erkeklerde ise üst ve alt çenede Moyers %50 olasılık tablosuyla gerçeğe yakın sonuçların elde edilebildiği saptanmıştır.

Keywords

• Karışık dişlenme, Yer analizi, Olasılık tabloları, Regresyon denklemleri

Assessment the Reliability of Different Mixed Dentition Analysis Methods to Estimate the Width of Unerupted Canines and Premolars

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate reliability of three different analysis methods that frequently used in the mixed dentition. Material-Method: The study was conducted in Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics archives on the plaster models of 147 individiuals between 12-22 years of age with complete permanent dentition up to first molar. The mesio-distal widths of teeth on study casts were measured with 0.01 mm accuracy digital caliper. Moyers probability tables, TanakaJohnston, Bernabe and Flores-Mir regression equations were used in the prediction of mesiodistal width of unerupted canine and premolar teeth. Student t-test was used while comparing teeth widths between gender and dental arches. The linear regression analysis was done for specifying the equations for the predicted size for canine and premolar teeth. Results: It was found that the predicted sizes determined by Bernabe and Flores-Mir regression equations and Tanaka-Johnston were more than the actual sizes. The difference between actual and predicted sizes that were stated by Moyers probability tables at 75th percentile on maxillary and 50th percentile on mandibulary in females; 50th percentile both on maxillary and mandibulary in males was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The results obtained were found to be close to the actual size with Moyers probability charts at 75th percentile on maxillary and 50th percentile on mandibulary in females; 50th percentile both on maxillary and mandibulary in males.

Keywords

• Mixed dentition, Space analysis, Probability charts, Regression equations

References

1. De Paula S, Almeida MA, Lee PC. Prediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107(3):309-14,1995.
2. Felicio LG, Ruellas ACO, Bolognese AM, Sant’Anna EF, Araujo MTS. Mixed dentition analysis: Tomography versus radiographic prediction and measure- ment. Dental Press J Orthod 15(5):159- 65,2010.
3. Graber TM. Incidence and recognition of malocclusion. In: Graber TM, ed. Orthodontics: principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2001, 204-5.
4. Güner D, Ülgen M. Moyers tablosunun Türk çocuklarına göre düzenlenmesi (Küçük azı ve kaninlerin mesio-distal ça- plarının belirlenmesi). Turkish J Orthod 13(2):102-7,2000.
5. Hammad SM, Abdellatif AM. Mixed dentition space analysis in Egyptian chil- dren. Pediatric Dent J 20(2):115-21,2010.
6. Hixon EH, Oldfather RE. Estimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspid and bicus- pid teeth. Angle Orthod 28(4):236- 40,1958.
7. Juneja S, Mahajan N, Kaur H, Verma KG, Sukhija M, Bhambri E. Comparative evaluation of three mixed dentition anal- yses and formulation of regression equa- tions for North Indian population: A cross-sectional 38(5):450-5,2015. Biomed J
8. Kadu A, Londhe SM, Kumar P, Datana S, Singh M, Gupta N. Estimating the size of unerupted canine and premolars in a mixed Indian population. J Dent Res Re- view 1(2):62-65,2014.

9. Kuswandari S, Nishino M, Arita K, Abe Y. Mixed dentition space analysis for In- donesian Javanese children. Pediatric Dent J 16(1):74-83,2006.
10. Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. Am J Orthod Den- tofacial Orthop 113(3):293-9,1998.
11. Legovic M Novosel A, Legovic A. Re- gression equations for determining mesi- odistal crown diameters of canines and premolars. Angle Orthod 73(3):314- 18,2003.
12. Lima Martinelli F, Martinelli de Lima E, Rocha R, Souza Tirre-Araujo M. Predic- tion of lower permanent canine and pre- molars width by correlation methods. Angle Orthod 75(5):805-8,2005.
13. Manjula M, Rani ST, David SR, Reddy ER, Sreelakshmi N, Rajesh A. Applica- bility of tooth size prediction in the mixed dentition space analysis in Nalgonda population. Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences 2(4):269
14. Meibodi SE, Meybodi ARF, Rahebi S, Eslamian L. The lower incisors as a pre- dictor for the size of unerupted canine and premolars in the Iranian ethnicity. Orthod Waves 68(3):112-5,2009.
15. Melgaço CA, de Sousa Araujo MT, de Oliveira permanent first molar and incisor width a predictor of mandibular canine and premolar width. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(3):340-45. Mandibular
16. Memon S, Fida M. Comparison of three mixed dentition analysis methods in orthodontic patients at AKUH. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 20(8):533-7,2010.
17. Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book; 1988, 235-9.
18. Nourallah AW, Gesch D, Khordaji MN, Splieth C. New regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary popula- tion. Angle Orthod;72(3):216-21,2002.
19. Oktay H, Erdem A, Gazilerli Ü. Değişik yöntemlere göre sürmemiş üst kanin ve premolarların saptanması. Turkish J Orthod 1(1):7- 14,1988. genişliklerinin
20. Philip NI, Prabhakar M, Arora D, Chopra S. Applicability of the Moyers mixed dentition probability tables and new pre- diction aids for a contemporary popula- tion in İndia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138(3):339-45,2010.
21. Sherpa J, Sah G, Rong Z, Wu L. Ap- plicability of the Tanaka-Johnston and Moyers mixed dentition analyses in Northheast Han Chinese. J Orthod 42(2):95-102,2015.
22. Srivastava B, Bhatia HP, Singh R, Singh AK, Aggarwal A, Gupta N. Validation of Tanaka and Johnston’s analysis in west- ern UP Indian population. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 31(1):36-42,2013.
23. Staley RN, O'Gorman TW, Hoag JF, Shelly TH. Prediction of the widths of unerupted canines and premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 108(2):185-90,1984.
24. Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc 88(4):798-801,1974.
25. Uysal T, Basciftci FA, Goyenc Y. New regression equations for mixed-dentition arch analysis in a Turkish sample with no Bolton tooth-size discrepancy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(3):343- 8,2009.