Evaluatıon of Mandıbular Morphology in Skeletal Class III Indıvıduals Wıth Panoramıc Radıographs

Abstract

In orthodontics, panoramic radiographs are usually used for diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic anomalies. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs and evaluate the mandibular morphology and differences in panoramic radiographs between skeletal Class I and Class III patients. Panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 78 patients were used as a material. 53 patients were chosen from Class III ANB° < 0 skeletal anomaly, were defined as study group, 25 patients who had Class I 0 < ANB°

Keywords

• Panoramic radiographs, Class III anomalies, Condylar morphology, Mandibular morphology

İSKELETSEL SINIF 3 BİREYLERİN MANDİBULAR MORFOLOJİLERİNİN PANORAMİK RADYOGRAFİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Panoramik radyografiler ortodonti kliniğinde, ortodontik anomalilerin teşhis ve tedavi planlamasında sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı; Sınıf 1 ve Sınıf 3 bireylerde panoramik radyografların, lateral sefalometrik radyograflarla ilişkisini incelemek ve panoramik radyograflarda ölçülen parametrelerle mandibulanın morfolojik özelliklerini ve farklılıklarını tanımlamaya çalışmaktır. Araştırma iskeletsel Sınıf 3 ANB° < 0 anomaliye sahip 53 birey ile iskeletsel Sınıf 1 0 < ANB°

Keywords

• Panoramik radyografi, Sınıf 3 anomali, kondil morfolojisi, mandibular morfoloji

References

1. Broadbent BH, Sr, Broadbent BH, Jr, Golden WH. Bolton standards of dentofacial development growth. St Louis: Mosby; 1975.
2. Graber.T.M, Panoramic radiography in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Of Orthod, 1967; 53:799-821
3. Sancak Ö, E. Özdiler, E. Gündüz, Köklü A., H.-P. Bantleon Analyse vertikaler Gesichtsveränderungen mithilfe von Panora- maröntgenaufnahmen. Inf Orthod Kieferort- hop, 2012, 44: 9–12
4. Akçam O., Altiok T., Özdiler O., Pan- oramic radiographs: A tool for investigating skeletal pattern. Am J Of Orthod, 2003, 123:175-181
5. Nazile Machmout Kechagia, Erhan Özdiler, İskeletsel Sınıf I, Sınıf II, Sınıf III va- kaların panoramik radyografi özelliklerinin be- lirlenmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim- leri Enstitüsü Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı, Doktora tezi, 2010
6. Larheim TA, Svanes DB., Johannnes- sen S. Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles. Am J Of Orthod.,1986; 90:45-51
7. Matilla K., Altonen M.,Haavikko K., Determination of the gonial angle from or- thopantomogram. Angle Orthodontist, 1977; 47:(2): 107-110
8. Özlem Sancak , Erhan Özdiler, Kesici diş konumlarının panoramik radyogarfilerle belirlenmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı, Doktora tezi, 2011

9. Mitani H.,Sato K.,Sugawara J.,Growth of mandibular prognathism after pubertal growth peak. Am J Of Orthod., 1993; 104:330- 336
10. Sugawara J.,Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. ,Long term effects of chincup therapy in skeletal profile in mandibular prognatsim., Am J of Orthod, 1990; 98:127-133
11. Moss ML, Salenjetin L,The Capsuler Matrix, Am J Orthod, 1969, 56:474-90
12. Kobayashi Y., Shiga H, Arakawa I, Yokoyama M., Nakajıma K., Difference of Masticatory function in subjects with different closing path, Journal of Prosthodontic Re- search, 2009; 53:11-14
13. Christensen LV, Radue JT, Lateral preference in mastication: an electromyograph- ic study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2007; 12(5):429-434
14. Kambylafkas P.,Murdock E., Validity of panoramic radiographs for measuring man- dibular asymmetry. Angle Orthodontist, 2006; 76:(3),388-393
15. Habets L.,Bezuur J.N.,Naeje M.,Hansson T.L, The Orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of tempomandibular joint problems II. The vertical smmetry, Journal of Oral Rehabilitaition,1988; 15, 465
16. Sezgin ÖS, Çelenk P., Arıcı S., Man- dibular Asymmetry in Different Occlusion Pat- terns. The Angle Orthodontist. 2007; 77: (5), 803-807.
17. Lin H.,Zhu P., Lin Y., Wan S., Shu X., Xu Y.,Zheng Y.,Mandibular asymmetry: a three- dimensional quantification of bilateral condyles. Head Face Med, 2013; 20; 9:42
18. Kheir NA., KaU CH., Measuring mandibular asymmetry in Class I normal sub- jects using 3D novel coordinate system. Ann Maxillofac. Surg., 2014; 4(1): 34- 38
19. Özdiler E., Başpınar E., Angle Kl III anomalilerin Mc Namara sefaLometrik analizi ile incelenmesi, Türk Ortodonti Derneği, 1992, 5(1):16-22 tttttt t
20. Mc Namara J., A method f Cephalo- metric evaluation. Am J Of Orthod., 1984; 6:449-469
21. Björk A., Prediciton of Mandibular Growth. Am J Of Orthod,1968;55(6),585-599
22. Skieller V, Bjork A, Linde-Hansen T., Prediction of mandibular growth rotation eval- uated from a longitudinal implant sample. Am J Of Orthod., 1984; 86:359–370
23. Čutović Tatjana, Pavlović Jasna, Kozomara Ružica, Radiographic cephalometry analysis of dimensions of condylar processus in persons with mandibular progna- thism,Vojnosanitetski Pregled.2008; Vol: 65, Issue 7, 513-519
24. Yassaei S., Zaeim M.,Evaluation of condylar heiht and width in patients with Class I and Class III malocclusions using panoramic and laterak cephalogram, Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 2006,vol 7,no:1
25. Kasimoglu Y, Tuna EB, Rahimi B, Marsan G, Gencay K. Condylar asymmetry in different occlusion types Cra- nio. 2015;33(1):10-4.
26. Uysal T, Sisman Y, Kurt G, Ramoglu SI. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite pati- ents and a normalocclusion sample.Am J Of Orthod 2009; 136(1):37-43.