Evaluation of Platform-Switch Implant Supported Crown Restorations With Fully Sin- terized Resin-Nano Zirconia Ceramic System: Case Repor

Abstract

Aesthetic, strength and retention are the most important parameters for implant supported single crown restorations. Especially, by the use of com- puter aided design/computer aided manufacture CAD/CAM technology with ceramic blocks to produce monolithic restorations, it is possible to complete the restorations in shorter time and get better durability. In this case report, it is exhibited two resin- nano ceramic crowns applied over implants pro- duced by using platform switching concept, ensu- ring the protection of osteon integration and a useful method, for 40 years old man with missing teeth of right maxillary first premolar and left ca- nine. The fact that the crown restorations are pro- duced by single sessions and applied to the pati- ents and their aesthetic properties are highly app- reciated by the patient and that clinical and radio- logical complications are not encountered in the control sessions show that positive results are ob- tained

Keywords

• dental crown, dental implant, platform switching

Tam sinterize rezin-nano zirkonya seramik sistemi ile yapılan platform-switch implant üstü kron restorasyonlarının değerlendirilmesi: vaka raporu

Abstract

İmplant üstü tek kron restorasyonlarında estetik, dayanıklılık ve tutuculuk en önemli parametreleri oluşturmaktadır. Özellikle seramik kronmateryallerin bilgisayar destekli tasarım/bilgisayar destekli üretim [computer aided design/computer aided manufacture CAD/CAM ] teknolojisi ile hazır seramik bloklardan monolitik restorasyonların üretilmesi ile restorasyonlar daha kısa sürede ve daha uzun ömürlü olarak yapılmaktadır. Bu olgu sunumunda, maksiller sağ 1. premolar ve sol kanin diş eksikliği olan 40 yaşındaki erkek olgunun, osteointegrasyonun sağlanmasında ve korunmasında faydalı bir yöntem olan platform switching konsepti ile yapılan iki adet implant üzerine yapılan rezin-nano seramik kronlar sunulmuştur. Kron restorasyonların tek seansta üretilerek hastaya uygulanması ve estetik özelliklerinin hasta tarafından oldukça beğenilmesi ve kontrol seanslarında klinik ve radyolojik herhangi bir komplikasyon ile karşılaşılmaması olumlu sonuçlar elde edildiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

• dental kron, dental implant, platform switching

References

1. 1. Polder BJ, Van't Hof MA, Van Der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A metaanalysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of perma nent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32(3):217-26.
2. 2. Salinas TJ, Block MS, Sadan A. Fixed partial denture or single-tooth implant restoration? Statical considerations for sequencing and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62(9 Suppl 2):2-16.
3. 3. Avivi-Arber L, Zarb GA. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported singletooth replacement: the Toronto Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(3):311- 21.
4. 4. Moslehifard E, Farid F. Single Tooth Replacement Using InCeram Re sin Bonded Fixed Partial Denture: A Clinical Report J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11(1):106-10.
5. 5. Chan AW, Barnes IE. A prospective study of cantilever resin-bonded bridges: an initial report. Aust Dent J 2000;45(1):31-6.
6. 6. Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Cemented versus screwretained implant-supported singletooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(2):260-5.
7. 7. Tabata LF, Assunção WG, Adelino Rıcardo Barão V, De Sousa EA, Gomes EA, Delben JA. Implant platform switching: biomechanical a pproach using two dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(1):182-7.
8. 8. Assaf M, Abu Gharbyeh AZ. Screwretained crown restorations of single implants: A step-by-step clinical guide. Eur J Dent 2014;8(4):563-70.

9. 9. Becker J, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Sahm N, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Stabilitiy of crestal bone level at platformswitched nonsubmerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36(6):532-9.
10. 10. Canay S, Akça K. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implantabutment interface. Implant Dent 2009;18(3):239-48.
11. 11. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26(1):9-17.
12. 12. Çakır TB, Vanlıoğlu B, Kulak Özkan Y. [Platform switching concept]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2014;24(2):301-307.
13. 13. Stafford, Gl. Platform switching of implants may decrease bone loss. Evid Based Dent 2015;16(3):84-5.
14. 14. Kılıç K, Kandemir BÇ, Kılınç Hİ, Kesim B. Examination of the marginal bone loss in implant restoration. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2013;16(3):188-196.
15. 15. Lee KH, Yeo IS, Wu BM, Yang JH, Han JS, Kim SH, Yi YJ, Kwon TK. Effects of Computer-Aided Manufacturing Technology on Precision of Clinical MetalFree Restorations. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:619027.
16. 16. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93(12):1232-4.
17. 17. Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang CY, Pai CA, Huang SF. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118(1):87- 93.
18. 18. Karaalioğlu OF, Yeşil Duymuş Z. CAD/CAM systems used in dentistry. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2008;18(1):25-32.
19. 19. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.
20. 20. Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5S-9S.
21. 21. Kois DE, Isvilanonda V, Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:110-22
22. 22. Zahran M, El-Mowafy O, Tam L, Watson PA, Finer Y. Fracture strength and fatigue resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns manufactured with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthodont 2008;17:370-7.
23. 23. Nordahl N, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strenght of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci 2015;57(3):255-61.
24. 24. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141-50.
25. 25. Quinn GD, Giuseppetti AA, Hoffman KH. Chipping fracture resistance of dental CAD/CAM restorative materials: part Iprocedures and results. Dent Mater 2014;30:e99-111.
26. 26. Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:117-23.
27. 27. Attia A, Kern M. Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:551-6.
28. 28. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(4):587-93.
29. 29. Karakoca Nemli S, Bankoğlu Güngör M. [Restoration of endodontically treated tooth in a single session by using CAD/CAM resin-nano ceramic endocrown.] Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci Cases 2015(1);2.
30. 30. Conserva E, Menini M, Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Ravera G, Pera F, Pera P. The use of masticatory robot to analyze the shock absorption capacity of different restorative materials for prosthetic implants: preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(1):53-5.
31. 31. Erkmen E, Meriç G, Kurt A, Tunç Y, Eser A. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial den-tures with fiber reinforced composite versu sconventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4(1):107-16.
32. 32. El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CADCAM blocks. Oper Dent 2015;40(2):201- 10.
33. 33. Bonfantea EA, Suzukib M, Lorenzonia FC, Senac LA, Hiratad R, Bonfantea G, Coelho PG. Probability of survival of implant-supported metalceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns. Dental Materials, 2015; 31(8):168-77.
34. 34. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11-25.
35. 35. Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(4):347-55.
36. 36. De Almeida FD, Carvalho AC, Fontes M, Pedrosa A, Costa R, Noleto JW, Mourão CF. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level aroun d internal-hex implants with switched platform: a clinical case report series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(3):587- 92.
37. 37. Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bonelevel alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(1):115-21.
38. 38. Ersu B, Yüzügüllü B, Canay Ş. [CAD / CAM applications with fixed restoration]. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2008;32(2):58-72.
39. 39. Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, GrauBenitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltratedceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7(4):495-500.
40. 40. Belli R, Petschelt A, Hofner B, Hajtó J, Scherrer SS, Lohbauer U. Fracture Rates and Lifetime Estimations of CAD/CAM All-ceramic Restorations. J Dent Res 2016;95(1):67-73.
41. 41. Lameira DP, Silva WA, Silva FA, De Souza GM. Fracture strength of aged monolithic and bilayer zirconia-based crowns. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:418641.
42. 42. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltratedceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29(4):419-26.
43. 43. Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri, LN, Magne P. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthet Dent, 2011;105(4):217-26.
44. 44. Joda T, Huber S, Bürki A, Zysset P, Brägger U. Influence of abutment design on stiffness, strength and failure of implant-supported monolithic resin nanoceramic (RNC) crowns. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17(6):1200-7.
45. 45. Chen C, Trindade FZ, De Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30(9):954-62.
46. 46. Magne P, Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Giannini M. Fatigue resistance of ultrathin CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(4):574-9.
47. 47. Egbert JS, Johnson AC, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. , Fracture strength of ultrathin occlusal veneer restorations made from CAD/CAM composite or hybrid ceramic materials. Oral Science International 2015;12(2):53–58.
48. 48. Johnson AC, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja SJ. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM composite and compositeceramic occlusal veneers. Prosthodont Res 2014;58(2):107-14.