Koronal sızıntının önlenmesinde çeşitli geçici restoratif materyallerin etkileri

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, koronal sızıntının önlenmesinde üç değişik geçici restorasyon materyalinin bakteriyel penetrasyon metodu kullanılaraketkilerinin incelenmesidir. Bu çalışmada, 40 adet tek köklü maksiller lateral diş kullanılmıştır. Obtüre edilen kök kanallarırastgele olarak seçilen onar dişten üç grubaayrılmıştır. Geriye kalan on dişten beşi pozitif kontrol grubunu oluştururken, geri kalan beş tanesi denegatif kontrol grubunu oluşturmuştur. Deneygrubuna dahil olan dişlerin koronal kısımlarıIonofill Voco, Germany , Cooltemp Coltene/Whaledent, Switzerland ve Systemp Inlay IvoclarVivadent, Germany kullanılarak restore edilmiştir.Dişlerin her biri model sistemde kültürortamına batırılmış ve belirli periyotlarda olmaküzere beş diş P. Aeruginosa ile inoküle edilirkendiğer beş diş S. Aeurus ile inoküle edilmiştir. Kültürortamında renk değişimi gösteren örneklerin periyotları kayıt edilmiştir.Elde edilen veriler Chi-square ve MannWhitney U testi kullanılarak istatistik olarak analizedilmiştir

Keywords

• Geçici restoratif materyaller, koronal sızıntı, bakteriyel penetrasyon.

In Vitro Examination of Effects of Various Temporary Restorative Materials in Prevention of Coronal Microleakage

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine effectsof three different temporary restorative materialson prevention of coronal leakage, using the methodof bacterial penetration.In the study, forty single rooted maxillary lateral teeth were used. The obturated root canals weredivided into three groups that include ten teethchoosen randomly. Five of the remaining ten teethwere classified as the positive control group, whereas the other five composed the negative controlgroup. Coronal parts of the teeth that were included in the experimentel group were restorated,using Ionofill Voco, Germany , Cooltemp Coltene/ Whaledent, Switzerland and SystempInlay Ivoclar Vivadent, Germany . Whereas theones in the positive control group the access cavitieswere left unsealed, those in the negative controlgroup were sealed either Ionofill, Cooltemp andSystemp Inlay.Each tooth was immersed in culture mediumin the model system and five teeth were inoculatedwith S. Aeurus, whereas the other five were inoculated with P. Aeruginosa at certain periods. Periodsof samples with a color change in the culture mediawere recorded. The data obtained were analysed statistically,using a Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test.Coronal penetration was observed in all groups,however. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups

Keywords

• Temporary restorative materials,coronal leakage, bacterial penetration

References

1. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical satatus of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the techni- cal quality of the root filling and coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995;28:12-8.
2. Imura N, Otani SM,Campos MJ, Jardim Junior EG, Zuolo ML. Bacterial penetration through temporary restorative materials in root canal treated teeth in vitro. Int End J 1997;30:381-5.
3. Balto H. An assesment of microbial coronal leakage of temporary filling materials in endodonti- cally treated teeth. J Endod 2002;38:762-4.
4. Pisano DM, DiFiore PM, McClanahan SB, Lautenschlager EP, Duncan JL. Intraorifice sealing of gutta-percha obturated root canals to perevent coronal microleackage. J Endod 1998:24:659-62.
5. Uctaşlı MB, Tınaz AC. Microleakage of dif- ferent types of restorative materials used in endodon- tics. J Oral Sci 2000;42:63-7.
6. Gorgulu G, Dolar K, Uctaslı M, Tınaz C, Cankaya F, Kınoglu T. Evaluation of coronal microleakage of four different glass-ionomer cements in endodontically treated teeth. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac 1996;2:546-50.
7. Mc Dougall IG, Patel V, Santerre P, Friedman s. Resistance of experimental glass ione- mer cement sealers to bacterial penetration in vitro. J Endod 1999;25:739-42.
8. Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kattering JD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth J Endod. 1990;16:566-9.

9. Saunders WP,Saunders EM. Coronal leac- kage as a cause of failure in root-canal thereapy a rewiev. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10:105-8.
10. Pai SF, Yang SF, Sue WL, Chueh LH, Riviera EM. Microleackage between endodontic temporary restorative materials placed at different times J Endod 1999;25:453-6.
11. Barthel CR, Strobach A, Briedigkeit H, Gobel UB, Roulet JF. Leakage in roots coronally sealed with different temporary fillings. J Endod 1999;731-4.
12. Cruz EV, Shigetani Y, Ishikawa K, Kota K, Iwaku m, Goodis HE. A laboratory study of coronal microleackage using four temporary restorative materials. Int Endod J 2002;35:315-20.
13. Deveaux E, Hildebert P, Neut C, Romond C. Bacterial microleackage of Cavit, IRM, TERM and Fermit: a 21 day in vitro study. J Endod 1999; 25:653-9.
14. Deveaux E, Hildebert P, Neut C, Boniface B, Romond C. Bacterial microleackage of Cavit, IRM and TERM. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:634-43.
15. Kertsen HW, Moorer WR. Particles and molucules in endodontic leakage. Int Endod J 1989;22:118-24.
16. Barthel CR, Moshonov J, Shuping G, Orstavik D. Bacterial leakage versus dye leakage in obturated root canals. Int Endod J 1999;32:370-5.
17. Uranga A, Blum JY, Esber S, Parahy E, Prado C. A comperative study of four coronal obtu- ration materials in endodontic treatment. J Endod 1999;25:178-80.