Evaluation of Dental Students’ Knowledge and Opinion About Learning with Virtual Reality

Year 2021, Volume: 48 Issue: Suppl 1, 14 - 16, 01.12.2021

Neslihan Ozveren Büşra Sevinç Ezgi Baltacı

https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2021.0026

Cited By: 1

Abstract

AIM: Virtual reality (VR) based technologies have been used in dentistry for almost two decades. Dental simulators, treatment planning software, and CAD/CAM systems have evolved significantly over the years, changing both dental education and clinical practice. The purpose of this survey study is to learn the knowledge, opinions, and thoughts of dental students in our country on the use of VR-based dental simulators in education, and to raise awareness on this issue.

METHODS: Questions testing participants’ knowledge were based on the data from peer-reviewed dental journals. The survey questions consisting of a total of 25 questions were delivered online via Google Forms (Google Inc., USA) to students who had preclinical training in the dental faculty before the Covid-19 pandemic. The data obtained were evaluated using the descriptive statistics and Pearson chi-square test.


RESULTS: 422 of the 662 students in the study were female and 240 were male students. 82.3% of the study participants were studying at a state university. 74.6% of the participants in the study stated that they needed more preclinical education. While 89.9% of the students participating in the survey stated that they do not have information about preclinical education with virtual reality, 97.4% stated that they have not used a VR-based dental simulator before. 85.5% of them stated that they feel positive about training in virtual environment with VR-based dental simulator and 86% of them prefer using both VR-based training and phantom models in preclinical training.

CONCLUSION: Dental students had overall positive attitudes towards VR-based dental simulator but very few used VR-based dental simulators in education and practice. While using VR-based dental simulators as part of undergraduate and continuing education programs is rapidly advancing in the world, in our country having knowledge about VR-based dental simulators will increase awareness for the development of such technologies and their inclusion in dentistry education.

Keywords

virtual reality, preclinic, students, dentistry

References

• 1. Perry S, Bridges SM, Burrow MF: A review of the use of simulation in dental education. Simulation in Healthcare 2015. 10(1): p. 31-37.
• 2. Wang D, Li T, Zhang Y, Hou J: Survey on multisensory feedback virtual reality dental training systems. European Journal of Dental Education 2016. 20(4): p. 248-260.
• 3. Roy E, Bakr MM, George R: The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: A review. The Saudi dental journal 2017. 29(2): p. 41-47.
• 4. Konukseven EI, Önder ME, Mumcuoglu E, Kisnisci RS: Development of a visio‐haptic integrated dental training simulation system. Journal of dental education 2010. 74(8): p. 880-891.
• 5. Akaltan KF: Diş hekimliğinde preklinik ve klinik eğitim çeşitliliği. Selcuk Dental Journal 2019. 6(5): p. 37-51.
• 6. Perry S, Burrow MF, Leung WK, Bridges SM: Simulation and curriculum design: a global survey in dental education. Australian dental journal 2017. 62(4): p. 453-463.
• 7. Sabalic M, Schoener JD: Virtual reality-based technologies in dental medicine: knowledge, attitudes and practice among students and practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 2017. 22(2): p. 199-207.
• 8. Ceylan E, Gürbüz E: Sanal gerçekliğin diş hekimliğinde kullanımıyla ilgili diş hekimlerinin bilgi düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi, in International Dentistry & Health Congress 2020: İzmir, Turkey. p. 195-200.
• 9. Gottlieb R, Lanning SK, Gunsolley JC, Buchanan JA: Faculty impressions of dental students’ performance with and without virtual reality simulation. Journal of dental education 2011. 75(11): p. 1443-1451.
• 10. Joda T, Gallucci GO, Wismeijer D, Zitzmann NU: Augmented and virtual reality in dental medicine: A systematic review. Computers in biology and medicine 2019. 108: p. 93-100.