Yapay Zeka Daha İyi Bir Etik Bilimsel Araştirmaya Yönelik Mi/Karşı Mı?

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 49 - 60

Huriye Yaşar , Vasif Karagücük

https://doi.org/10.46871/eams.1455756

Abstract

Yapay zeka, küresel bazda oldukça gündem olmuş bir konudur. Her alanda etkisi ve yarattığı değişimler insan faktörünün emeğini gözden geçirmeye sebep olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akademisyenler için bilimsel amaçlarla yapay zeka kullanımını incelemektir. Çalışmada yapay zekanın bilimsel araştırmalarda kullanımı üzerindeki etik tartışmalar betimsel bir yolla aktarılmıştır. Alan yazında bu durumla ilgili ortaya koyulmuş olan farklı çalışmalar ve görüşler incelenmiştir. Yapay zeka, gündelik hayatta yerini almışken ve hayatın bir gerçeği haline gelmişken, bunu bilimsel araştırma süreçleri ve ortamlarından ayrı bir yere koymak mümkün değildir. Unutulmamalıdır ki bütün bu süreçlerde yapay zeka ne kadar başarılı olursa olsun akademisyenlerin rolü ve etkisi daimidir. Akademisyenlere düşen görev, değişen dünyanın değişen ihtiyaç ve taleplerine cevap verebilecek nitelikte olmak, etik açısından duyarlı, her türlü yanlı ve yanlış bilgiden arındırılmış çalışmalar ortaya koymaktır.

Keywords

yapay zeka, etik, bilimsel araştırma

Is Artificial Intelligence against/for Better Ethical Scientific Research?

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has become a highly debated topic globally. Its impact and the changes it brings in every field prompt a reassessment of the human factor's contribution. This study aims to examine the use of artificial intelligence for academic purposes for researchers. In the study, ethical concerns about the use of artificial intelligence in scientific research are explained descriptively. Various studies and opinions regarding this matter in the literature have been examined. While artificial intelligence has become a part of everyday life and a reality, it cannot be separated from scientific research processes and environments. It should be remembered that regardless of how successful artificial intelligence is in all these processes, the role and impact of researchers remain constant. Researchers have to be capable of responding to the changing needs and demands of the evolving world, producing works that are free from any bias and incorrect information, and being ethically sensitive.

Keywords

artificial intelligence, ethics, scientific research

References

• 1. Wang P. On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence. 2019;10(2):1-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002.
• 2. Whitby B. Artificial intelligence. The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc.; 2009.
• 3. Hassani H, Silva ES, Unger S, et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Intelligence Augmentation (IA): What Is the Future?. AI. 2020;1:143-155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020008.
• 4. Thomas R, Bhosale U, Shukla K, et al. Impact and perceived value of the revolutionary advent of artificial intelligence in research and publishing among researchers: a survey-based descriptive study. Science Editing. 2023;10(1):27. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.294.
• 5. Yalçınkaya A. Artificial Intelligence and Social Sciences. In: XI. Uludağ Congress On International Relations Full Text Book. Bursa, Turkey; 2019:10-26.
• 6. Korkmaz A, Aktürk C, Talan T. Analyzing the user's sentiments of ChatGPT using Twitter data. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics. 2023;4(2):202-214. https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2023.02.02.018.
• 7. Talan T, Kalınkara Y. The role of artificial intelligence in higher education: ChatGPT assessment for anatomy course. Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;7(1):33-40. https://doi.org/10.33461/uybisbbd.1244777.
• 8. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. 2021. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1352854/ [Accessed 20 May 2024].
• 9. Ray PP. ChatGPT: A Comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 2023;3:121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.
• 10. Rose R, Holmes W, Griffiths M, et al. Intelligence Unleashed. An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson; 2016. London, UK.
• 11. Dignum V. Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue. Ethics Inf Technol. 2018;20(1-3):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9450-z.
• 12. Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?. Crit Care. 2023;27:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2.
• 13. Dewey J, Tufts JH. Ethics. DigiCat; 2022. Chicago, IL.
• 14. Chen TJ. ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scentific writing. J Chin Med Assoc. 2023;86(4):351-353. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000900.
• 15. UNESCO. Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. 2021. Accessed March 10, 2024. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/ethics.
• 16. D Neto BA, Eberlin MN. The Art of Scientific Writing and Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence. J Braz Chem Soc. 2024;35:e-20230121. https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20230121.
• 17. Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(4):1148-1154. PMID: 37168339; PMCID: PMC10164801.
• 18. Galiana LI, Gudino LC, González PM. Ethics and artificial intelligence. Rev Clin Esp (Engl Ed). 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2024.02.003.
• 19. Gilat R, Cole BJ. How will artificial intelligence affect scientific writing, reviewing, and editing? The future is here… Arthroscopy. 2023;39(5):1119-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.014.
• 20. Kacena MA, Plotkin LI, Fehrenbacher JC. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Review Articles. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024;22:115-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00852-0.
• 21. Turnitin. Turnitin's AI writing detection available now. 2023. Accessed March 11, 2024. Available at: https://www.turnitin.com/solutions/ai-writing.
• 22. Scerbo MW. Can Artificial Intelligence Be My Coauthor?. J Soc Simul Healthc. 2023;18(4):215-218. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000743.
• 23. Huang C, Zhang Z, Mao B, et al. An overview of artificial intelligence ethics. IEEE Trans Artif Intell. 2022;4(4):799-819. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3194503.