Reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems' Scoring in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 150 - 159

Zeynep Ergenç Hasan Ergenç Erkan Aksoy Özlem Karaca Ocak Kerim Güzel Feyzi Gökosmanoğlu

https://doi.org/10.46871/eams.1463163

Abstract

Objective: It is known that Thyroid Ultrasonography (US), guided by Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), is a cost-effective and safe diagnostic method for evaluating thyroid nodules. Our purpose in the present study is to determine the reliability of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) Scoring System for the evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Materials and Methods: A total of 3612 patients who were followed up in our endocrinology and general surgery clinic and operated on with the diagnosis of multinodular and nodular goiter were included in the study. The malignancy risk rate of all TIRADS categories was analyzed according to postoperative pathology results.
Results: Among the 724 patients, who were included in the study, preoperative FNA results were as 11.04% (n=80) benign, follicular, Hurthle cell neoplasia or suspected 8.83% (n=64), malignancy suspected 40.33% (n=292) and malignant 39.77% (n=288). We determined in the study that the malignancy was 72.15% (n=228) in TR-4 nodules and 97.1% (n=336) in TR-5 nodules. No correlations were detected between anti-TPO, anti-TG, TSH level, and malignancy.
Conclusion: TIRADS Scoring System was successful in predicting malignancy rates in the present study.

Keywords

FNA biopsy, risk assessment, risk factors, TIRADS, ultrasonography

Ethical Statement

yes

Supporting Institution

no

Project Number

no

Thanks

no

Tiroid Nodüllerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Tiroid Görüntüleme Raporlama ve Veri Sistemleri Skorlamasının Güvenilirliği

Abstract

Amaç: İnce İğne Aspirasyonu (İİA) kılavuzluğunda yapılan Tiroid Ultrasonografisinin (US), tiroid nodüllerinin değerlendirilmesinde maliyet etkin ve güvenli bir tanı yöntemi olduğu bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız Tiroid Görüntüleme Raporlama ve Veri Sistemleri (TIRADS) Skorlama Sisteminin tiroid nodüllerinin değerlendirilmesinde güvenilirliğini belirlemektir.
Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmaya endokrinoloji ve genel cerrahi kliniğimizde takip edilen ve multinodüler ve nodüler guatr tanısı ile ameliyat edilen toplam 3612 hasta dahil edildi. Tüm TIRADS kategorilerinin malignite risk oranı postoperatif patoloji sonuçlarına göre analiz edildi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 724 hastanın dağılımı incelendiğinde ameliyat öncesi İİA sonuçları benign, foliküler %11,04 (n=80), Hurthle hücreli neoplazi veya şüpheli %8,83 (n=64), malignite şüphesi %40,33 (n=292) ve malign %39,77 (n=288) idi. Çalışmada maligniteyi TR-4 nodüllerinde %72,15 (n=228), TR-5 nodüllerinde ise %97,1 (n=336) olarak saptandı. Anti-TPO, anti-TG, TSH düzeyi ve malignite arasında korelasyon saptanmadı.
Sonuç: TIRADS Skorlama Sistemi bu çalışmada malignite oranlarını öngörmede başarılı olmuştur.

Keywords

FNA biyopsisi, risk değerlendirmesi, risk faktörleri, TIRADS, ultrasonografi

Project Number

no

References

• 1. Jeong EJ, Chung SR, Baek JH, et al. A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Core Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules: Pain, Tolerability, and Complications. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(1):114-120.
• 2. Rossi ED, Adeniran AJ, Faquin WC. Pitfalls in Thyroid Cytopathology. Surg Pathol Clin. 2019;12(4):865-881.
• 3. Lee YH, Baek JH, Jung SL, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a consensus statement by the korean society of thyroid radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16(2):391-401.
• 4. Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, et al. Multiinstitutional analysis of thyroid nodule risk stratification using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2017;208(6):1331-1341.
• 5. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): A User's Guide. Radiology. 2018;287(1):29-36.
• 6. Yoon JH, Lee HS, Kim EK, et al. Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: comparison between the thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the 2014 American Thyroid Association management guidelines. Radiology. 2016;278(3):917-924.
• 7. Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S, et al. British Thyroid Association. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014;81(1):1-122.
• 8. Tappouni RR, Itri JN, McQueen TS, Lalwani N, Ou JJ. ACR TI-RADS: Pitfalls, Solutions, and Future Directions. Radiographics. 2019;39(7):2040-2052.
• 9. Moon HJ, Kim EK, Yoon JH, et al. Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with non-diagnostic results at cytologic examination: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the Bethesda System. Radiology 2015;274(1):287-295.
• 10. Zheng Y, Xu S, Kang H, et al. A Single-Center Retrospective Validation Study of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. Ultrasound Q. 2018;34(2):77-83.
• 11. Wei X, Li Y, Zhang S, et al. Meta-analysis of thyroid imaging reporting and data system in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of 10,437 thyroid nodules. Head Neck. 2016;38(2):309-15.
• 12. Barbosa TLM, Junior COM, Graf H, ve ark. ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. BMC Endocr Disord. 201929;19(1):112-115.
• 13. Jabar ASS, Koteshwara P, Andrade J. Diagnostic reliability of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in routine practice. Pol J Radiol. 2019;10(2);274-280.
• 14. Weiss VL, Andreotti RF, Ely KA. Use of the thyroid imaging, reporting, and data system (TI-RADS) scoring system for the evaluation of subcentimeter thyroid nodules. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(8):518-524.
• 15. Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF, et al. European thyroid association guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: The EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J. 2017;6(5):225-237.
• 16. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):587-595.
• 17. Lauria Pantano A, Maddaloni E, Briganti SI, et al. Differences between ATA, AACE/ACE/AME and ACR TI-RADS ultrasound classifications performance in identifying cytological high-risk thyroid nodules. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178(6):595-603.
• 18. Lassoued MB, Souissi B, Hammami K, et al. The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) for ultrasound of the thyroid: a pratical approach. European Congress of Radiology-ECR 2015.
• 19. Chandramohan A, Khurana A, Pushpa BT, et al. Is TIRADS a practical and accurate system for use in daily clinical practice? Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2016;26(1):145-52.
• 20. Srinivas MN, Amogh VN, Gautam MS, et al. A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016;69(2):5-15.
• 21. Al-Qurayshi Z, Foggia MJ, Pagedar N, et al. Thyroid cancer histological subtypes based on tumor size: National perspective. Head Neck. 2020;42(9):2257-2266.
• 22. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Special types of thyroid carcinoma. Histopathology. 2018;72(1):40-52.
• 23. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133.