Research Article

Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing

Volume: 4 Number: 1 March 27, 2023
EN TR

Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing

Abstract

While global trends like university rankings and neoliberal policies have changed the operation of the higher education systems worldwide, they brought a new managerial understanding that prioritized competition and quantification of performance over collegiality and quality. This transformation rendered values like trust and professionalism hollow, weakened the relationships among faculty and directors, and eventually prepared a suitable ground for mobbing to flourish. The study aims to examine the phenomenon of academic mobbing from the perspectives of Turkish faculty based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model. 12 semi-structured in-depth interviews with the targeted faculty working at different universities in Ankara, İstanbul, Konya and Eskişehir were conducted. The major findings of the study were as follows: the perpetrators of mobbing were the directors who adopted autocratic and laissez-faire leadership styles and had good relationships with in-group members; academic culture was described with threat, fear, jealousy, humiliation, high-powerdistance and collectivisms, all of which triggered mobbing; the targeted faculty were determined, strong and self-confident in nature as well as impulsive and aggressive at times; mobbing predominantly ended in resignation, psychological and psychosomatic problems, and the lack of belonging; the top two coping strategies were getting social support and facing the mobbers; and the most frequent suggestions were for leaders to ensure meritocracy, for faculty to leave the institution the soonest time possible, and for the state to create a mobbing law. Finally, it is recommended that democratic and transformative leadership styles be used at universities and independent expert groups inspect them.

Keywords

References

  1. Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G, Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 438–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00672.x
  2. Agervold, M. (2009). The significance of organizational factors for the incidence of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009. 00710.x.
  3. Agervold, M., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2004). Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work and Stress, 18, 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02678370412331319794.
  4. Ågotnes, K. W., Skogstad, A., Hetland J., Olsen, O. K., Espevik, R., Bakker, A. B. & Einarsen, S. V. (2020). Daily work pressure and exposure to bullying-related negative acts: The role of daily transformational and laissez-faire leadership, European Management Journal, 39(4), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.011
  5. Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimizations in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1023-1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1023.
  6. Arnold, K. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological wellbeing: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000062
  7. Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700701
  8. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education, Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 27, 2023

Submission Date

March 3, 2023

Acceptance Date

March 19, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 4 Number: 1

APA
Erdemir, B. (2023). Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing. Eğitim Bilim Ve Araştırma Dergisi, 4(1), 171-220. https://doi.org/10.54637/ebad.1259385
AMA
1.Erdemir B. Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing. EBAD. 2023;4(1):171-220. doi:10.54637/ebad.1259385
Chicago
Erdemir, Burcu. 2023. “Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture As the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing”. Eğitim Bilim Ve Araştırma Dergisi 4 (1): 171-220. https://doi.org/10.54637/ebad.1259385.
EndNote
Erdemir B (March 1, 2023) Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing. Eğitim Bilim ve Araştırma Dergisi 4 1 171–220.
IEEE
[1]B. Erdemir, “Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing”, EBAD, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 171–220, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.54637/ebad.1259385.
ISNAD
Erdemir, Burcu. “Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture As the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing”. Eğitim Bilim ve Araştırma Dergisi 4/1 (March 1, 2023): 171-220. https://doi.org/10.54637/ebad.1259385.
JAMA
1.Erdemir B. Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing. EBAD. 2023;4:171–220.
MLA
Erdemir, Burcu. “Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture As the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing”. Eğitim Bilim Ve Araştırma Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 1, Mar. 2023, pp. 171-20, doi:10.54637/ebad.1259385.
Vancouver
1.Burcu Erdemir. Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Predecessors of Academic Mobbing. EBAD. 2023 Mar. 1;4(1):171-220. doi:10.54637/ebad.1259385