PUBLIC POLICIES FOR INTERNATIONALIZATION: A STUDY FOR PORTUGUESE FIRMS

Abstract

Internationalization can be considered as a gradual and evolutionary process in which firms progressively increase their involvement in international business. Most small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that internationalize face a variety of constraints in terms of resources and skills, information, financial capital, the experience of their managers, as well as the constraints inherent to the vulnerability of the external environment. Many firms that could succeed in international markets may not have the resources to make the investment. It is also widely acknowledged that the external institutional environment in which firms are embedded may shape firms' strategic responses. Internationalization is a beneficial process for the firm and for the national and local economy and can generate economies of scale in local firms and promote the transfer of technology and managerial knowledge, generating growth and employment. These benefits explain the implementation of export promotion activities and publicly funded programs, as the benefits justify the costs associated with this government expenditure. In light with such facts, governmental assistance may be able to promote the internationalization process of firms. In the international business literature, researchers have examined how home and host market institutions affect the internationalization strategy of multinational enterprises (MNEs), but our focus is to understand how the home institutional environment, and more specifically the public policies act or not as an enhancing factor for internationalization. This paper tackles this question by using a novel survey dataset of 320 Portuguese firms and a quantitative approach based on a regression analysis. We aim at identifying which firm and managerial characteristics are related with a more proficient use of public support for internationalization. The originality of this research lies in the fact that it seeks to ascertain the importance of public policies to support internationalization, in the entrepreneur's perspective.

Keywords

• Internationalization
• Public Policies
• Entrepreneurship

References

1. Ahmed, F. & Brennan, L. (2019). An institution-based view of firms’ early internationalization. Effectiveness of national export promotion policies. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 911-954.
2. Austrade, (2002), Knowing and Growing the Exporter Community, Australian Trade Commission, Canberra.
3. Bannò, M. & Sgobbi, F. (2010). Firm participation in financial incentive programmes: The case of subsidies for outward internationalisation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32, 792–803.
4. Barboza, R.A.B., Fonseca, S.A. & de Ramalheiro, G.C.F. (2017). “O papel das políticas públicas Para potencializar a inovação em pequenas empresas de base tradicional”, REGE – Revista De Gestão, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 58-71, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rege.2016.10.001
5. Bernard, A.B. & Jensen, J.B. (2004). “Why some firms export”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 561-569.
6. Calabrese, G. & Manello, A. (2018). Firm internationalization and performance: Evidence for designing policies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40, 1221–1242.
7. Campos, J.; Braga, V. & Correia, A. (2018). Public policies for entrepreneurship and Internationalization. Is there a government reputation effect? Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(4), 975-995.
8. Cansino, J.M., Lopez-Melendo, J., Pablo-Romero, M. d P. & Sánchez-Braza, A. (2013). “An economic evaluation of public programs for internationalization: the case of the diagnostic program in Spain”, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 41, pp. 38-46, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.07.002

9. Capelleras, J., Kevin, M., Greene, F., & Storey, D. (2008). Do more heavily regulated economies have poorer performing new ventures? Evidence from Britain and Spain. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 688–702.
10. Coudounaris, D. (2018). Export promotion programmes for assisting SMEs, Review of International Business and Strategy, 28(1), 77-110.
11. Cruz, M. (2014). “Do export promotion agencies promote new exporters?”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7004, Washington, DC.
12. Etemad, H. (2020). Collective internationalization strategy, dispersed information, and entrepreneurial orientation interactions. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 18, 1-14.
13. Finchelstein, D. (2017). The role of the State in the internationalization of Latin American firms. Journal of World Business, 52, 578–590.
14. Francis, J. & Collins-Dodd, C. (2004). “Impact of export promotion programs on firm competencies, strategies and performance: the case of Canadian high-technology SMEs”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 21 Nos 4/5, pp. 474-495.
15. Görg, H., Henry, M. & Strobl, E. (2008). “Grant support and exporting activity”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 90 No. 1, pp. 168-174.
16. Kalinic I., Clegg J. (2017). SME Internationalization, Public Policy and the Growth Agenda. In: Ibeh K., Tolentino P., Janne O., Liu X. (eds) Growth Frontiers in International Business. (pp. 33-46). The Academy of International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
17. Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2008). Policy-making. In Daniele Caramani (Ed). Comparative Politics (pp.495-519). Oxford University Press.
18. Martincus, C.V. & Carballo, J. (2010). “Entering new country and product markets: does export promotion help?”, Review of World Economics, Vol. 146 No. 3, pp. 437-467.
19. Mudambi, R. & Zahra, S.A. (2007). The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), 333-352.
20. Nuruzzaman, N; Singh, D. & Gaur, A. (2019). Institutional support, hazards, and internationalization of emerging market firms. Global Strategy Journal, 10, 361–385.
21. Preece, S.B., Miles, G. & Baetz, M.C. (1998). “Explaining the international intensity and global diversity of early-stage technology-based firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 259-281.
22. Sarfati, G. (2013). Estágios de desenvolvimento económico e políticas públicas de empreendedorismo e de micro, pequenas e médias empresas (MPMEs) em perspetiva comparada: os casos do brasil, do Canadá, do Chile, da Irlanda e da Itália. Revista De Administração Pública, Vol. 47 (1), 25-48.