The Causal Relationship between Real Interest Rates and Inflation in Central Asian Countries: A Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Data Approach

Year 2024, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 14

Elina Kaparova , Nurdan Aslan

Abstract

This study investigates the causal relationship between real interest rates and inflation in five Central Asian transition economies: Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. While the Fisher Effect traditionally posits a long-run neutrality of real interest rates in response to changes in expected inflation via nominal interest rate adjustments, this study specifically focuses on real interest rates rather than nominal ones. Annual data for the period 2000–2024 were collected from the official databases of the central banks of the respective countries. To explore the direction of causality, the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) Panel Granger Causality test was applied, which allows for cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity across countries. The empirical findings indicate a unidirectional causality running from inflation to real interest rates. This result implies that inflation significantly shapes interest rate dynamics in these countries, although it does not offer direct validation of the traditional Fisher Hypothesis. The findings contribute to understanding monetary policy behavior in post-socialist economies.

Keywords

Real Interest Rate , Central Asia Countries , Inflation , Panel Causality , Dumitrescu-Hurlin , Central Bank Data

References

• ADEGBOYEGA, S.B., ODUSANYA, I.A., POPOOLA, R.O. (2013). Fisher’s Effect in Nigeria: Empirical Analysis Using ARDL (Bound Test) Approach. International Journal of Science and Research, 12 (2), 378-382.
• BENAZIC, M. (2013). Testing The Fisher Effect in Croatia: An Empirical Investigation. Economska Misao i Praksa, 22 (1), 83-102.
• BRZOZA-BRZEZINA, M (2002). The Relationship between real interest rates and inflation. National Bank of Poland Working Papers, 23, 1-26.
• ÇELIK, M.Y.,ÜNSÜR, Z. (2020). Küreselleşme ve Büyüme İlişkisinin Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Nedensellik Testi İle Belirlenmesi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 35(1), 201-210.
• DESROCHES, B., FRANCIS, M. (2007). World Real Interest Rates: A Global Savings and Investment Perspective. Bank of Canada, 16, 1-25.
• FAMA, E. (1975). Short Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation. American Economic Review, 65, 269-282.
• FISHER, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest: as Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest It. New York: Macmillan
• GROSSE-RUESCHKAMP, B., ROCHOLL, J. (2020). Ursachen und Konsequenzen von Niedrigzinsen. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch, 72, 401-421.
• HASSANVAND, D., NADEMI, Y. (2018). A Empirical Analysis of Existence of the Mundell’s Relationship Between Interest Rate and Inflation in Iran: A State-Space Approach. Monetay & Financial Economics, 25 (15), 219-238.
• ITO, T. (2016). Does The Fisher Hypothesis Hold in Sweden? An Analysis of Long-Term Interest Rates Under the Regime of Inflation Targeting. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5 (3) , 283-295.
• İSAKOVA, A. (2010). Monetary Policy, Inflation and Dollarization in the Economies of Central Asia. Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta Socialnich ved, 1-186.
• KANDEL, S., OFER, A.R., SARIG, O. (1996). Real Interest Rates and Inflation: An Ex-Ante Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 205-225.
• KATENOVA, M. (2013). Fisher Hypothesis in Kazakhstan, Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Reading Book, 464-471.
• KENNEDY, P. (2000). Eight Reasons Why Real Versus Nominal Interest Rates Is The Most Important Concept in Macroeconomics Principles Courses. American Economic Review, 90 (2), 81-84.
• MAGHYEREH, A., AL-ZOUBI, H. (2006). Does Fisher Effect Apply in Developing Countries: Evidence From a Nonlinear Cotrending Test Applied to Argentina, Brazil, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea and Turkey. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 6 (2), 31-46.
• MISHKIN, F. (1991). Is the Fisher for Real? A Reexamination of the Relationship between Inflation and Interest Rates. NBER Working Paper, (3632), 1-35.
• MOROŞAN, G., ZUBAŞ, I.M. (2015). Interest Rate, Exchange Rate and Inflation in Romania. Correlates and Interconnection. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 8, 146-160.
• MUNDELLl, R. (1963). İnflation and Real İnterest. The Journal of Political Economy, 71 (3), 280-283.
• ONGAN, S., GOCER, I. (2020). The Relationship Between Interest Rates and Inflation: Examining the Fisher Effect in China. Frontiers of Economics in China, 15 (2), 247-256.
• RAVENNA, F., SEPPALA, J. (2007). Monetary Policy, Expected Inflation and Inflation Risk Premia. Bank of Finland Research, 18, 1-31.
• STRAUSS, J., TERRELL, D. (1995). Cointegration tests of the Fisher Hypothesis with variable trends in the world real interest rate, Southern Economic Journal, 61(4), 1047-1056.
• SUGÖZÜ, İ.H., DUYSHOBAY KIZI, A.(2024). Is The Fisher or Neo-Fisher Effect Valid in Asian Countries? A Panel Data Analysis On The Causality Between Inflation and Interest Rates. Inflation, Inequality, Nanotechnology and Development, 83-103.
• TOBIN, J. (1969). A General Equilibriun Approach to Monetary Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1, 15-29.
• URIBE, M. (2017). The Neo-Fisher Effect in the United States and Japan. NBER Working Papers 23977, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1-30.
• URIBE, M. (2018). The Neo-Fisher Effect: Econometric Evidence From Empirical and Optimizing Models. NBER Working Paper Series, 25089, 1-44
• WALSCH, C.E. (2010). Monetary Theory and Policy. The MIT Press, Third Edition, 1-613.