Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: The case of an English-Turkish Bilingual Child versus a Turkish Monolingual Child

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 5, 1 - 47, 10.11.2014

Evrim Eveyik Aydın

Öz

 The current study aims to
investigate the bilingual advantages in morphological processing and reading
comprehension by comparing the performances of a 7:4 year-old English-Turkish bilingual child and a 7:10
year-old Turkish monolingual child on two morphological awareness tasks, namely a
derivation task and a decomposition task in Turkish developed for the purpose
of the study, and on a reading comprehension task. The findings of the study
revealed that the monolingual child outperformed the bilingual child both in morphological
awareness and reading comprehension tasks. These findings supported Cummin’s threshold
hypothesis suggesting that a critical level of proficiency in L2 must be
reached if bilingual advantages in cognitive and linguistic functioning are to
develop. Besides, the findings verified the relation between the morphological
processing skills and reading comprehension.

Anahtar Kelimeler

morphological processing, monolingual, linguistic functioning, reading comprehension

Kaynakça

• Banguoğlu, T. (2000). Türkçenin Grameri (6.baskı). Türk Dil Kurumu, Ankara.
• Bialystok, E. (1986). Factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 13-32. Carlisle, C.F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169-190.
• Carlisle, C.F., Beeman, M., Davis, L.H., & Spharim, G. (1999). Relationship of metalinguistic capabilities and reading achievement for children who are becoming bilingual. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 459-478.
• Carlisle, C.F. & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7 (3), 239-253. Carlisle, C.F. & Katz, L.A. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words. Reading and Writing, 16, 669-693.
• Campbell, R. & Sais, E. (1995). Accelerated metalinguistic (phonological) awareness in
• bilingual children. British Journal of Development Psychology, 13, 61-68.
• Cromdal, J. (1999). Childhood bilingualism and metalinguistic skills: Analysis and control in young Swedish-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 1-20.
• Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of Bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 9, 131-149.
• Deacon, H.S., Wade-Wooley, L. & Kirby, J. (2007). Crossover: The role of morphological awareness in French immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43 (3), 732-746.
• Diaz, R. & Klingler, C. (1991). Towards an exploratory model of interaction between bilingualism and cognitive development. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 167-192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Pre ss.
• Freyd, P. & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282-295.
• Jones, N. K. (1991). Development of morphophonemic segments in children’s mental representations of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 217-239
• Ku, Y. & Anderson, R.C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 399-422. Larsen, J.A. & Nippold, M.A. (2007). Morphological analysis in school-age children: Dynamic assessment of a word learning strategy. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 38 (3), 201-212.
• Nagy, W., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vaughan, K. & Vermeulen, K. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psycahology, 95(4), 730-742.
• Nippold, M.A. & Sun, L. (2008). Knowledge of morphologically complex words:A developmental study of older children and young adolescents. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 39 (3), 365-373.
• Oflazer, K., Say, B., Hakkani-Tur, D.Z., & Tur, G. (2003). Building a Turkish Treebank: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Retrieved from http://www.speech.sri.com/people/gokhan/pubs/ttbank-book.pdf On Dec 2, 2008.
• Ricciardelli, L. A. (1992). Bilingualism and cognitive development in relation to threshold theory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 301-316.
• Reichle, E.D. & Perfetti, C.A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word- experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7 (3), 219-237. Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219-252.
• Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7 (4), 263-272.
• Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649-667.
• Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (2003). Introduction to this special issue: The role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7 (3), 209-217.
• Wang, M. Cheng, C. & Chen, S. (2006). Contribution of morphological awareness to Chinese-English Biliteracy acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (3), 542-553.