Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity

Number: 57 June 2, 2025
EN TR

Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity

Abstract

In the study, a total of 100 questions from the physics test in the Basic Proficiency Test (TYT) and Field Proficiency Tests (AYT) of the Higher Education Entrance Examinations (YKS) between 2019-2023 were analyzed within the framework of the 2018 Secondary Education Physics Curriculum (MoNE, 2018). The findings were carefully compared with the results of previous studies by Gacanoğlu (2024), Gacanoğlu and Nakiboğlu (2022), and Gacanoğlu and Nakiboğlu (2024) In the first part of analysis, it was found that, among the 213 learning achievements outlined in the 2018 physics curriculum, most questions were derived from the"Force and Motion" unit of the 9th-and 11th-grades. This indicated a lack of homogeneity in the distribution of questions across TYT and AYT physics tests. Nevertheless, it was ultimately concluded that the content validity of the YKS physics test questions was generally preserved, as questions addressed learning achievements from curriculum units. In the second part of the study, the content validity of the YKS physics and chemistry test questions was compared based on curriculum alignment. Although the chemistry test contained the highest number of achievement-based questions, its content validity was lower than that of the physics test due to the lack of questions on certain topics.

Keywords

2018 physics course curriculum, 2018 chemistry test curriculum, basic proficiency test(TYT), field proficiency test(AYT)

References

  1. Ayvacı, H. Ş., Yamak, S., & Duru, M. K. (2018). Analysis of 2016 LYS and YGS physics questions according to bloom taxonomy and achievements in the curriculum. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 47(2), 798-832.
  2. Biçer, B. (2013). Comparative analysis of philosophy group courses (psychology, sociology, logic) curriculum and LYS questions. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 2(3), 1-14.
  3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
  4. Çoban, A., Uludağ, N., & Yılmaz, A. (2006). Evaluation of chemistry course in terms of high school programs and OSS questions. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 30(30), 102-109.
  5. Çoban, A., & Hançer, A. H. (2006). Evaluation of physics course in terms of high school programs and OSS questions. Kastamonu Educational Journal, 14(2), 431-440.
  6. Dökmen, Ü. (1992). TC higher education council student selection and placement center: establishment, development, activities. ÖSYM .
  7. Dursun, A., & Parim, G. A. (2014). Comparison of YGS 2013 mathematics questions with secondary school 9th-grade mathematics exam questions according to bloom taxonomy and curriculum. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 4(1), 17-37.
  8. Efe, N. & Temelli, A. (2003). Evaluation of 1999-2000-2001 ÖSS biology questions in terms of level and content. Kastamonu Educational Journal, 11(1), 105-114.
  9. Gacanoğlu, Ş. S., & Nakiboğlu, C. (2022). Analysis of chemistry questions in higher education institutions exams according to the 2018 chemistry curriculum achievements. Journal of Turkish Chemistry Society Section C: Chemistry Education, 7(2), 217-242. https://doi.org/10.37995/jotcsc.1165863
  10. Gacanoğlu, Ş. S., & Nakiboğlu, C. (2024). Evaluation of the chemistry test questions in terms of acquisitions in the entrance exams to higher education institutions during the earthquake period of 2023 and comparison with the exam questions applied during the covıd-19 pandemic period. Maarif Mektepleri International Journal of Educational Sciences, https://doi.org/10.46762/mamulebd.1397168
APA
Gacanoğlu, Ş. (2025). Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity. Educational Academic Research, 57, 136-145. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1474789
AMA
1.Gacanoğlu Ş. Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity. Educational Academic Research. 2025;(57):136-145. doi:10.33418/education.1474789
Chicago
Gacanoğlu, Şengül. 2025. “Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity”. Educational Academic Research, nos. 57: 136-45. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1474789.
EndNote
Gacanoğlu Ş (June 1, 2025) Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity. Educational Academic Research 57 136–145.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Gacanoğlu, “Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity”, Educational Academic Research, no. 57, pp. 136–145, June 2025, doi: 10.33418/education.1474789.
ISNAD
Gacanoğlu, Şengül. “Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity”. Educational Academic Research. 57 (June 1, 2025): 136-145. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1474789.
JAMA
1.Gacanoğlu Ş. Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity. Educational Academic Research. 2025;:136–145.
MLA
Gacanoğlu, Şengül. “Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity”. Educational Academic Research, no. 57, June 2025, pp. 136-45, doi:10.33418/education.1474789.
Vancouver
1.Şengül Gacanoğlu. Comparison of Chemistry and Physics Test Questions in the 2019-2023 Higher Education Institutions Entrance Exams in Terms of Content Validity. Educational Academic Research. 2025 Jun. 1;(57):136-45. doi:10.33418/education.1474789