Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Tuncay Gezerler; Servet Atik

doi:10.33418/education.1650498

TR EN

Öğretmen Liderliği Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Xie ve arkadaşları (2021) tarafından geliştirilen Öğretmen Liderlik Ölçeği'ni Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Bu uyarlama ile, bütünleştirici liderlik, mesleki öğrenme liderliği, ölçme ve değerlendirme liderliği, öğretim liderliği, topluluk liderliği ve politika liderliği boyutlarında öğretmen liderliğinin araştırılmasına ve sunulmasına katkıda bulunulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda, Türkiye'deki devlet okullarında görev yapan 397 öğretmenden veri toplanmıştır. Bu araştırmada veri elde etmek için Öğretmen Liderlik Ölçeği (ÖLÖ) kullanılmıştır. Orijinal Öğretmen Liderlik Ölçeği altı boyuttan oluşmakta ve 32 madde içermektedir. Araştırma verileri toplanmış ve ardından SPSS 25 ve AMOS 24 yazılım paketleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Ölçeğin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizleri, bilimsel yöntemler ve çok perspektifli bir yaklaşım kullanılarak Türk kültürüne uyarlanmasını sağlayacak şekilde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin orijinal yapısının Türk kültürel bağlamında yapı geçerliliğini belirlemek için Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin yakınsak geçerliliğini belirlemek için Bileşik Güvenilirlik (CR) ve Ortalama Açıklanan Varyans (AVE) değerleri birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Ölçeğin güvenilirliğini belirlemek için Cronbach's Alpha ve McDonald's Omega katsayıları kullanılarak iç tutarlılık ve bileşik güvenilirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin zaman içindeki kararlılığını belirlemek için test-tekrar test yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, ölçek maddelerinin ölçeğin yapısına katkıda bulunup bulunmadığını değerlendirmek için madde-toplam korelasyon değerleri incelenmiştir. Ölçek üzerinde yapılan geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizleri sonucunda, Öğretmen Liderlik Ölçeği altı boyut ve 24 madde ile oluşturulmuştur. Analizler, Öğretmen Liderlik Ölçeği'nin Türk kültüründe kullanım için uygun, geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

öğretmen liderliği, ölçek uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik

Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

The aim of the study is to adapt the Teacher Leadership Scale, developed by Xie et al. (2021), into Turkish. Through this adaptation, it sought to contribute to the investigation and presentation of teacher leadership in the dimensions of integrative leadership, professional learning leadership, measurement and evaluation leadership, instructional leadeship, community leadership, and policy leadership. Within this scope, data were collected from 397 teachers working in public schools in Türkiye. The Teacher Leadership Scale (TLS) was used to obtain data in this research. The original Teacher Leadership Scale consists of six dimensions and includes 32 items. The research data were collected and subsequently analyzed using SPSS Statistics 25 and AMOS 24 software packages. The validity and reliability analyses of the scale were conducted in a manner to ensure its adaptation to Turkish culture using scientific methods and a multi-perspective approach. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the construct validity of the scale's original structure in the Turkish cultural context. To determine the convergent validity of the scale, Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Explained (AVE) values were evaluated together. To establish the reliability of the scale, internal consistency and composite reliability analyses were conducted using Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficients. The test-retest method was used to determine the scale's stability over time. Furthermore, item-total correlation values were examined to assess whether the scale items contributed to the scale's structure. As a result of the validity and reliability analyses performed on the scale, the Teacher Leadership Scale was established with six dimensions and 24 items. The analyses concluded that the TLS is appropriate, valid, and reliable for use in the Turkish culture.

Keywords

teacher leadership, scale adaptation, validity and reliability

References

Adams, D., & Gamage, D. T. (2008). A study of leadership effectiveness in a large VET institution in Australia. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(3), 214-228.
Ağırman, N., & Ercoşkun, M. H. (2017). Classroom teachers' evaluation of teacher efficacy and teacher leadership levels. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 715-728.
Akyürek, M. İ., & Özdemir, M. (2021). Teacher leadership Turkish adaptation of the scale: Validity and reliability study. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 488-500.
Angelle, P. S., & DeHart, C. (2010). A four factor model of teacher leadership: Construction and testing of the Teacher Leadership Inventory. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
Aslan, M. (2011). Teacher leadership behaviours and classroom climate: A research in the context of teacher and student views (Master's thesis). Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir.
Bakioğlu, A. (1998). Teacher leader. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 10, 11-19.
Bay, M. & Paylı, M. (2022). Control theory and customer satisfaction of the relationship between the service business in Karaman with structural equation modelling (SEM): An application in a service organisation in Karaman. Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research, 11(4) ,2222-2241.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186- 3191.
Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S. & Kılınç, A.Ç. (2020). Principals supporting teacher leadership: The effects of learning- centred leadership on teacher leadership practices with the mediating role of teacher agency. European Journal of Education, 55 (2), 200-216.
Beycioğlu, K. & Aslan, B. (2010). Teacher leadership scale: Validity and reliability study. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 764- 775.

Bolat, Ö. (2023). Teacher leadership behaviour scale: Validity and reliability study. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Education Faculty Journal, 56, 1033-1056.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2004). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A guide for social scientists. Routledge.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Pegem Akademi.
Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modelling with AMOS basic concepts, applications and programming (Multivariate Applications Series). Routledge.
Can, N. (2009). Teachers' leadership behaviors in the classroom and at school. Gaziantep University Journal Sciences, 8(2), 385-399.
Centre for Strengthening the Teaching Profession. (2018). Teacher leadership skills framework. https://cstp- wa.org/teacher-leadership/teacher-leadership-skills- framework
Chen, J. (2020). Understanding teacher leaders' behaviours: Development and validation of the Teacher Leadership Inventory. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-19. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1741143220945704
Cheng, C. K. (2009). Revitalising teacher leadership via bureaucratic-professional practices: A structural equation model. The Asia- Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 283- 295.
Chow, W. S. (2016). Conceptualising the roles of teacher leaders: A Singapore case study. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 15(3), 205-223.
Chua, Y., Cooray, S., Cortes, J. P. F., Denny, P., Dupuch, S., Garbett, D. L., Nassani, A., Cao, J., Qiao, H., Reis, A., Reis, D., Scholl, P. M., Sridhar, P. K., Suriyaarachchi, H., Taimana, F., Tanga, V., Weerasinghe, C., Wen, E., Wu, M., Wu, Q., Zhang, H., & Nanayakkara, S. (2024). Striving for authentic and sustained technology use in the classroom: Lessons learned from a longitudinal evaluation of a sensor-based science education platform. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(18), 5073-5086.
Cooper, K. S., Stanulis, R. N., Brondyk, S. K., Hamilton, E. R., Macaluso, M., & Meier, J. A. (2016). The teacher leadership process: Attempting change within embedded systems. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 85-113.
Crowther, F., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2009). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Corwin.
Çetinkaya, A. & Arastaman, G. (2024). Teacher leadership scale and analysing its psychometric properties. Gazi University Gazi Education Faculty Journal, 44(1), 425-466.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Social multivariate statistics for sciences: SPSS and Lisrel applications. Pegem Akademi.
Çolak, İ., Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2014). The relationship between teachers' teacher leadership roles and organisational commitment levels. Educational Process: International Journal, 3(1-2), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2014.312.4
Demir, K. (2014). Teacher leadership culture scale: Validity and reliability study. İlköğretim Online, 13(2), 334-344.
Demir, Ö., & Şahin, S. (2023). School principal performance development of evaluation scale. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Education Faculty Journal, 58, 2738-2757.
Deniz, L. & Hasançebioğlu, T. (2003). Teacher leadership styles a scale study to determine the scale. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 17, 55-62.
Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the uninitiated (Introducing Statistical Methods Series). Sage.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPPS (3rd ed.). Sage.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Garshi, A., Jakobsen, M. W., Nyborg-Christensen, J., Ostnes, D., & Ovchinnikova, M. (2020). Smart technology in the classroom: A systematic review. Prospects for algorithmic accountability.arXiv.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.06374
Geiser, C. (2012). Data analysis with Mplus. Guilford.
Güngör, D. (2016). Development of measurement tools in psychology and adaptation guide. Turkish Psychological Writings, 19(38), 104-112.
Güven, Y. (2015). The effects of teacher leaders on school culture. (Master's Thesis). Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences, Istanbul.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317-338.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hanuscin, D. L., Rebello, C. M., & Sinha, S. (2012). Supporting the development of science teacher leaders. Where do we begin? Science Educator, 21(1), 12-18.
Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University.
Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2002). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Maidenhead: Open University.
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach's alpha for estimating reliability. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53- 60.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Hu, J., & Gu, L. (2012). An investigation to the current state teacher leadership in China and its affecting elements: Taking Guangdong province as an example. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 32(5), 111-116.
Hunzicker, J. (2019). What makes a teacher a leader? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55(3), 130-136.
İnanır, B. (2020). Teachers' job integration levels and examining the relationships between school climate and teacher leadership (Master's thesis). Kastamonu University Institute of Social Sciences, Kastamonu.
Kahramanoğlu, R. & Eriş, A. (2020). Teacher leadership in the classroom development of the scale: Validity and reliability study. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 17(45), 40-70.
Katyal, K. R. & Evers, C. W. (2004). Teacher leadership and autonomous student learning: adjusting to new realities. International Journal of Educational Research. 41, 367- 382.
Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Corwin press.
Kesti, R. & Töre, E. (2023). Teacher leadership and teachers' examining the relationship between school image perceptions. TEBD, 21(3),1514-1539. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1299459
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford.
Kıral, E. (2021). Servant leadership scale development study: An application on teachers. Journal of Education and Training Research, 10(3), 83-99.
Korucu, A. T. & Ünüvar, M. (2020). Computer and teaching: The relationship between the education received by prospective teachers studying in the department of technology teaching and their IT leadership qualities and 21st century skills. Journal of Information and Communication Technologies, 2(1), 44-53.
Kwon, Y. & Marzec, M. L. (2016). Does worksite culture of health (CoH) matter to employees? Empirical evidence using job-related metrics. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(5), 448-454.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Lee, D. H. L., & Kwan Ip, N. K. (2021). The influence of professional learning communities on informal teacher leadership in a Chinese hierarchical school context. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1- 21.
Leithwood, K. (2012). The Ontario Leadership Framework 2012 with a discussion of the research foundations. Institute for Educational Leadership and the Ontario Ministry of Education, Toronto.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation.
Li, L., & Liu, Y. (2022). An integrated model of principal transformational leadership and teacher leadership in relation to teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 661- 678.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 36(4), 611-637.
McDonald, R.P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology.
MacKay, P. (2006). Researching the role of outliers in educational research. Journal of Educational research, 99(5), 265-278.
Margolis, J., & Deuel, A. (2009). Teacher leaders in action: Motivation, morality, and money. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(3), 264-286.
Martin, K., & Coleman, P. (2011). Licensing teacher leaders: The Kansas model. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 77(3), 6- 9.
Martinez, M. A. A., & Tadeu, P. M. (2018). Teacher leadership: A bibliometric study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(4), 425-449.
Muijs, D & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education 22(8), 961-972.
Mundy, K., Manion, C., Proulx, K., & de Britto, T. F. (2022). Teacher leadership during COVID-19 in Africa and Latin America: An exploratory qualitative study in six countries. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2118374
Nelson, N. L. (1966). Teacher leadership - empirical approach to analysing teacher behaviour in classroom. Journal of Teacher Educatıon, 17(4), 417-425.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook, 97-146.
O'Rourke, N. & Hatcher, L. (2013). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Sas Institute.
Öntaş, T., & Okut, L. (2017). The relationship between private elementary and middle school teachers’ leadership behaviors and classroom management tendencies. Inönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(1), 98-115.
Özdamar K. (2017). Scale in education, health and behavioural sciences and test development: Structural equation modelling. April.
Özdemir, M., & Demircioğlu, E. (2015). Distributed leadership and contract relations: Evidence from Turkish high schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 918-938.
Öztürk, N. & Şahin, S. (2017). Organisational culture in educational organisations and teacher leadership: The mediating role of leader- member interaction. İlköğretim Online, 16(4), 1451-1468.
Pallant, J. F. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). London, United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
Pan, Y., & Chen, J. (2020). Principals' leadership and teacher leadership: A shared and complementary process. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 130-148.
Saydullayeva F, A. & Raxmonova L.O. (2021). Key qualities of a modern teacher leader. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 3, 49-50.
Schermelleh-Engel, K. & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Schott, C., van Roekel, H. & Tummers, L. G. (2020). Teacher leadership: A systematic review, methodological quality assessment and conceptual framework. Educational Research Review, 31(2020), 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100352.
Sebastian, J., Huang, H. & Allensworth, E. (2017). Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organisational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 463-488.
Seçer, İ. (2015). Psychological test development and adaptation process SPSS and LISREL applications. Anı.
Shen, J., Ma, X., Gao, X., Bierlien Palmer, L., Poppink, S., Burt, W., Leneway, R., McCrumb, D., Pearson, C., Rainey, M., Reeves, P., & Wegenke, G. (2019). Developing and validating an instrument measuring school leadership. Educational Studies, 45(4), 402-421.
Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100357.
Simon, D., Kriston, L., Loh, A., Spies, C., Scheibler, F., Wills, C., & Harter, M. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy- Preference-Index (API). Health Expect, 13(3), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00584.x
Supovitz, J. (2018). Teacher leaders' work with peers in a quasi-formal teacher leadership model. School Leadership &Management, 38(1), 53-79.
Sugg, S. A. (2013). The relationship between teacher leadership and student achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/138
Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2012) Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 418-451.
Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, Journal of Educational Statistics, 47(2).
Szeto, E. & Cheng, A.Y.N. (2018). Principal-teacher interactions and teacher leadership development: Beginning teachers' perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21 (3), 363-379.
Şişman, M. & Taşdemir, İ. (2008). Turkish education system. Pegem Akademi.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). Likert type scale development guide. Turkish Psychological Association.
Toytok, E. H. (2016). School leader's innovation managements and organisational stress: A relational model study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(n12A), 173- 179.
Tümoğlu, E., Ergün, Z., & Memiş, E. K. (2024). Scientific reasoning skills scale: Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Education Faculty Journal, 61, 1985-2000.
Tsai, K. C. (2017). Development of the Teacher Leadership Style Scale. Social Behaviour and Personality, 45(3), 477-490.
Wang, M., & Xia, J. (2020). A scale for measuring teacher leadership in early childhood education in China: Development and validation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-23.
Warren, L.L. (2021). The Importance of teacher leadership skills in the classroom. Education Journal, 10(1), 8-15.
Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134-171.
Xie, C., Song, P. & Hu, H. (2021). Measuring teacher Leadership in different domains of practice: Development and validation of the Teacher Leadership Scale. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(5), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00527-9
Xu, H., & Tracey, T. J. (2017). Use of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in examining measurement invariance in counselling psychology research. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology, 6(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2041
Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Factor analysis in social sciences and validity: Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Istanbul University Journal of Business Administration Faculty, 46, 74-85.
Yılmaz, E. & Jafarova, G. (2022). Teacher leadership scale development: Validity and reliability study. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Education Faculty Journal (AKEF) Journal, 4(2), 328-346.
Yiğit, Y., Doğan, S. & Uğurlu, C. T. (2013). Teachers' views on teacher leadership behaviours. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 2(2), 93-105. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cije/issue/4275/57587
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255- 316.
Yuet, F., Yusof, H. & Mohamad, S. (2016). Development and validation of the Teacher Leadership Competency Scale. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(2). 43- 69.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Education Management, Leadership in Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tuncay Gezerler ^*
0000-0002-2188-7128
Türkiye

Servet Atik
0000-0003-2841-6182
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

January 26, 2026

Publication Date

January 26, 2026

Submission Date

March 5, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 27, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 60

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1650498

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA46DE34ZF

APA

Gezerler, T., & Atik, S. (2026). Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Academic Research, 60, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1650498

AMA

1.Gezerler T, Atik S. Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Academic Research. 2026;(60):95-110. doi:10.33418/education.1650498

Chicago

Gezerler, Tuncay, and Servet Atik. 2026. “Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study”. Educational Academic Research, nos. 60: 95-110. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1650498.

EndNote

Gezerler T, Atik S (March 1, 2026) Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Academic Research 60 95–110.

IEEE

[1]T. Gezerler and S. Atik, “Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study”, Educational Academic Research, no. 60, pp. 95–110, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.33418/education.1650498.

ISNAD

Gezerler, Tuncay - Atik, Servet. “Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study”. Educational Academic Research. 60 (March 1, 2026): 95-110. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1650498.

JAMA

1.Gezerler T, Atik S. Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Academic Research. 2026;:95–110.

MLA

Gezerler, Tuncay, and Servet Atik. “Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study”. Educational Academic Research, no. 60, Mar. 2026, pp. 95-110, doi:10.33418/education.1650498.

Vancouver

1.Tuncay Gezerler, Servet Atik. Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Academic Research. 2026 Mar. 1;(60):95-110. doi:10.33418/education.1650498

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License
29929

Öğretmen Liderliği Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract

Keywords

Turkish Adaptation of Teacher Leadership Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Early Pub Date

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite