Research Article

Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions

Number: Advanced Online Publication Early Pub Date: May 18, 2026
EN TR

Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the burnout levels of undergraduate students in the context of their university perceptions. The study group consisted of 219 undergraduate students (71.2% female; 27.4% male; 1.4% not reporting). Data were collected using “Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Form” and “University Perception and Personal Information Form”. Content analysis was employed to analyze the data. The analysis revealed that undergraduate students’ perceptions of university were grouped into fifteen subcategories under three main categories (positive and developmental perception, functional and context-dependent perception, and negative and constraining perception). As a result of ANOVA, conducted to examine the relationship between undergraduate students’ university perceptions and their burnout levels, it was found that the exhaustion and depersonalization scores of students who perceived the university positively were significantly lower than those who perceived the university functionally or negatively. However, no significant difference was observed between the efficacy scores of students who perceived the university functionally or positively, but the efficacy scores of both groups were significantly higher than those who perceived the university negatively. These findings suggest a significant relationship between the burnout levels of undergraduate students and their university perceptions. Consequently, it is recommended that the university perceptions of undergraduate students should be considered in studies aiming to reduce their burnout levels.

Keywords

Student burnout, University perception, Undergraduate students

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Ufuk University Ethics Commission, with the decision dated 15.05.2019 and numbered 2019/43.

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2016). College students as emerging adults: The developmental implications of the college context. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 219-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587422
  2. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün Ö. A., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Scientific research methods. Pegem Publishing.
  3. Cazan, A. M. (2015). Learning motivation, engagement and burnout among university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 413-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.077
  4. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Critical metaphor analysis. In Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis (pp. 243-253). Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2020). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.). Eğiten Kitap.
  6. Çağatay İn, E. & Şanlı Kula, K. (2019). Examination of burnout and life satisfaction of university students: Kirsehir Ahi Evran University. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 32(2), 403-441.
  7. Çapri, B., Gündüz, B., & Gökçakan, Z. (2011). Turkish adaptation of Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Scale (MBI-SS): Validity and reliability research. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 40, 134-147.
  8. Çapri, B., Özkendir, O. M., Özkurt, B., & Karakuş, F. (2012). General self-efficacy beliefs, life satisfaction and burnout of university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 968-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.765
  9. Çetin, E. (2018, November). Problems of universities and university students from the perspectives of university students and faculty members. In Proceedings of the 9th International Education Management Forum (pp. 706–735).
  10. Doğan, D. (2014). Analysis of the school concept through the perspectives of candidate teachers via metaphors. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 7(3), 361-382.
APA
Salman, N., Dur Öztürk, C., & Uçar, S. S. (2026). Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions. Educational Academic Research, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1666760
AMA
1.Salman N, Dur Öztürk C, Uçar SS. Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions. Educational Academic Research. 2026;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.33418/education.1666760
Chicago
Salman, Neslihan, Cemile Dur Öztürk, and Selcen Sultan Uçar. 2026. “Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions”. Educational Academic Research, no. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1666760.
EndNote
Salman N, Dur Öztürk C, Uçar SS (May 1, 2026) Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions. Educational Academic Research Advanced Online Publication
IEEE
[1]N. Salman, C. Dur Öztürk, and S. S. Uçar, “Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions”, Educational Academic Research, no. Advanced Online Publication, May 2026, doi: 10.33418/education.1666760.
ISNAD
Salman, Neslihan - Dur Öztürk, Cemile - Uçar, Selcen Sultan. “Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions”. Educational Academic Research. Advanced Online Publication (May 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1666760.
JAMA
1.Salman N, Dur Öztürk C, Uçar SS. Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions. Educational Academic Research. 2026. doi:10.33418/education.1666760.
MLA
Salman, Neslihan, et al. “Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions”. Educational Academic Research, no. Advanced Online Publication, May 2026, doi:10.33418/education.1666760.
Vancouver
1.Neslihan Salman, Cemile Dur Öztürk, Selcen Sultan Uçar. Burnout in Undergraduate Students: An Investigation in the Context of University Perceptions. Educational Academic Research. 2026 May 1;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.33418/education.1666760