Eğitimde uzamsal yetenek çalışmaları üzerine bibliyometrik bir inceleme

Year 2024, Issue: 53, 1 - 20, 30.06.2024

Berna Yıldızhan Kökten Erhan Ertekin

Abstract

Mevcut çalışmada, eğitim alanında uzamsal yetenek ile ilgili yayınlanmış bilimsel belgelerin bibliyometrik olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında -“spatial abil*” and “educat*”- formülü kullanılarak tarama gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde VOSviewer programı kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda 1975-2022 yılları arasında yayınlanmış 1317 bilimsel çalışmaya ulaşılmıştır. İlgili konu alanında WoS’ta yayınlanan ilk çalışma
1984 yılına aittir. 2000’li yıllar itibari ile popülerlik kazanmaya başlayan uzamsal yetenek kavramı ile ilgili en fazla yayın 2020 yılında üretilmiştir. En fazla yayın üretilen, ilişki ağı en güçlü olan ve en fazla atıf alan ülke Amerika’dır. İlişki ağı en güçlü olan kurum Tomsk Devlet Üniversitesi, en fazla yayın yapan kurum La Laguna Üniversitesi, en fazla atıf alan kurum ise Vanderbilt Üniversitesi’dir. İlişki ağı en güçlü olan ve en fazla atıf alan bilimsel belge Wai vd. (2009)’dir. Atıf ilişkisi en güçlü olan ve en fazla atıf alan bilimsel kaynak Journal of Educational Psychology (Eğitim Psikolojisi Dergisi)’dir.

Keywords

Ağ analizi, Bibliyometrik analiz, Eğitim, İş birliği, Uzamsal yetenek

A bibliometric review on spatial ability studies in education

Abstract

In the current study, it is aimed to bibliometrically examine the published scientific documents on spatial ability in the field of education. Within the scope of the research, a scan was performed using the formula -“spatial abil*” and “educat*”- in the Web of Science (WoS) database. VOSviewer program has been used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the analysis, 1317 scientific studies published between 1975-2022 were reached. The first study published in WoS in the related subject area belongs to the year 1984. The most publications on the concept of spatial ability, which began to gain popularity as of the 2000s, were produced in 2020. The country that produces
the most publications, has the strongest relationship network and receives the most citations is the USA. The organization with the strongest relationship network is Tomsk State University, the organization with the most publications is La Laguna University, and the organization with the most citations is Vanderbilt University. The scientific document with the strongest relationship network and the most cited is Wai et al. (2009). The scientific resource with the strongest citation relationship and the highest number of citations is the Journal of Educational Psychology

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis, Collaboration, Education, Network analysis, Spatial ability

References

• Agbo, F. J., Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., & Suhonen, J. (2021). Application of virtual reality in computer science education: A systemic review based on bibliometric and content analysis methods. Education Sciences, 11(3), 142-165. doi: 10.3390/educsci11030142
• Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin bilimsel yayın politikası: Atıf dizinlerine dayalı bibliyometrik bir yaklaşım (Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. Ariel, R., Lembeck, N. A., Moffat, S., & Hertzog, C. (2018). Are there sex differences in confidence and metacognitive monitoring accuracy for every day, academic, and psychometrically measured spatial ability? Intelligence, 70, 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.08.001
• Bangirana, P., Menk, J., John, C. C., Boivin, M. J., & Hodges, J. S. (2013). The association between cognition and academic performance in Ugandan children surviving malaria with neurological involvement. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55653. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055653
• Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5-6), 327–344. doi:10.1007/bf00287729
• Caci, B., Chiazzese, G., & D’Amico, A. (2013). Robotic and virtual world programming labs to stimulate reasoning and visual-spatial abilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1493–1497. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.070
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
• Chao, C. C., Yang, J. M., ve Jen, W. Y. (2007). Determining technology trends and forecasts of RFID by a historical review and bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2005. Technovation, 27(5), 268-279. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.09.003
• * Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
• Di, X., & Zheng, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of virtual technologies on students’ spatial ability. Educational technology research and development, 70(1), 73-98.
• Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1979). Cognitive factors: Their identification and replication. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 79(2), 3-84.
• Garcia, N. L., Hall, L., & Pruden, S. M. (2021). Individual differences in young children’s spatial ability: A systematic review. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5mc2y
• * Guillot, A., Champely, S., Batier, C., Thiriet, P., & Collet, C. (2007). Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(4), 491–507. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9021-7
• * Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684–689. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684
• Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
• Höffler, T. N. (2010). Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 245–269. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9126-7
• * Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(6), 392–404. doi:10.1111/j.13652729.2006.00180.x
• Jamali, S. M., Zain, A. N. M., Samsudin, M. A., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2015). Publication trends in physics education: A bibliometric study. Journal of Educational Research, 35, 19-36. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.801889
• Jiménez-Fanjul, N., Maz-Machado, A., & Bracho-López, R. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of the mathematics education journals in the SSCI. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 2(3), 26-32.
• Julius, R., Halim, M. S. A., Hadi, N. A., Alias, A. N., Khalid, M. H. M., Mahfodz, Z., & Ramli, F. F. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of research in mathematics education using scopus database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11329
• Karagöz, B., & Şeref, İ. (2019). Okuma alanındaki araştırmaların bibliyometrik özellikler açısından incelenmesi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(3), 781-799.
• * Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339–345. doi:10.1016/s0097-8493(03)00028-1
• Korkmaz, E., & Morali, H. S. (2022). A meta-synthesis of studies on the use of augmented reality in mathematics education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), em0701. doi: 10.29333/iejme/12269
• Langlois, J., Bellemare, C., Toulouse, J., & Wells, G. A. (2020). Spatial abilities training in anatomy education: A systematic review. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(1), 71-79. doi: 10.1002/ase.1873
• Le Thi Thu, H., Tran, T., Trinh Thi Phuong, T., Le Thi Tuyet, T., Le Huy, H., & Vu Thi, T. (2021). Two decades of STEM education research in middle school: A bibliometrics analysis in Scopus database (2000–2020). Education Sciences, 11(7), 353. doi:10.3390/educsci11070353
• Lohman, D. (1996). Spatial ability and g. I. Dennin & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 97–116). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
• * Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344–351. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022
• * Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
• * Lufler, R. S., Zumwalt, A. C., Romney, C. A., & Hoagland, T. M. (2012). Effect of visual-spatial ability on medical students’ performance in a gross anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(1), 3–9. doi:10.1002/ase.264
• Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2012). A Meta-Analysis on Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability Measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x
• Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60(1), 95–109. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011
• * Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
• * Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389
• McLaughlin, J. A., & Bailey, J. M. (2022). Students need more practice with spatial thinking in geoscience education: a systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 1-58. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2022.2029305
• Molina-Carmona, R., Pertegal-Felices, M., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., & Mora-Mora, H. (2018). Virtual reality learning activities for multimedia students to enhance spatial ability. Sustainability, 10(4), 1074. doi:10.3390/su10041074
• Mondal, S., & Roy, B. K. (2018). Bibliometric study of PhD theses in Mathematics of The University of Burdwan, 2005-2012. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 8(1), 343-353.
• Nurjanah, Latif, B., Yuliardi, R., & Tamur, M. (2020). Computer-assisted learning using the Cabri 3D for improving spatial ability and self- regulated learning. Heliyon, 6(11), e05536. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05536
• Özkaya, A. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of the studies in the field of mathematics education. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(22), 723-734. doi: 10.5897/ERR2018.3603
• Papakostas, C., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2021). Exploration of augmented reality in spatial abilities training: a systematic literature review for the last decade. Informatics in Education, 20(1), 107-130. Phan, T. T., Do, T. T., Trinh, T. H., Tran, T., Duong, H. T., Trinh, T. P. T., ... & Nguyen, T. T. (2022). A bibliometric review on realistic mathematics education in Scopus database between 1972-2019. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1133-1149.
• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
• Reilly, D., & Neumann, D. L. (2013). Gender-Role Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analytic Review. Sex Roles, 68(9-10), 521–535. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0269-0
• Roach, V. A., Mi, M., Mussell, J., Van Nuland, S. E., Lufler, R. S., DeVeau, K., … Wilson, A. B. (2020). Correlating spatial ability with anatomy assessment performance: A meta‐analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education , 14(3), 317-329. doi:10.1002/ase.2029
• * Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
• * Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604
• Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327-350. doi: 10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341
• Suh, J., & Young Cho, J. (2020). Linking spatial ability, spatial strategies, and spatial creativity: A step to clarify the fuzzy relationship between spatial ability and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100628. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100628
• Suseelan, M., Chew, C.M., & Chin, H. (2022). Research on mathematics problem solving in elementary education conducted from 1969 to 2021: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 10(4), 1003-1029. doi: 10.46328/ijemst.2198
• Sümen, O. O. (2019). A Meta-Synthesis About the Studies on Spatial Skills in Turkey. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(4), 23-41. doi: 10.15345/iojes.2019.04.003
• Umut-Zan, B. (2012). Türkiye’de bilim dallarında karşılaştırmalı bibliyometrik analiz çalışması(Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• * Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how?. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 147-181). Academic Press.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In Advances in Data Analysis: Proceedings of the 30 th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation eV, Freie Universität Berlin, March 8–10, 2006 (pp. 299-306). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053-1070. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
• Van Nuland, S. E., & Rogers, K. A. (2015). The anatomy of E-Learning tools: Does software usability influence learning outcomes? Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(4), 378–390. doi:10.1002/ase.1589
• Vogel, J. J., Bowers, C. A., & Vogel, D. S. (2003). Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: A metaanalysis. Brain and Cognition, 52(2), 197–204. doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00056-3
• * Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817. doi: 10.1037/a0016127
• Wang, L., Cohen, A. S., & Carr, M. (2014). Spatial ability at two scales of representation: A metaanalysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 140–144. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.006
• * Wu, H.-K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. doi:10.1002/sce.10126
• Yılmaz, K. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde ve eğitim bilimlerinde sistematik derleme, meta değerlendirme ve bibliyometrik analizler. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(2), 1457-1490. doi: 10.33206/mjss.791537
• Yuan, L., Kong, F., Luo, Y., Zeng, S., Lan, J., & You, X. (2019). Gender Differences in Large-Scale and Small-Scale Spatial Ability: A Systematic Review Based on Behavioral and Neuroimaging Research. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128
• Xie, F., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Xin, Z. (2019). Is Spatial Ability Related to Mathematical Ability: a Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 113-155. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09496-y