1981-2022 Yılları Arasında Beyin Fırtınası Üzerine Bir Çalışma: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Year 2025, Issue: 59

Tuğba İnciman Çelik , Cenk Akay

https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1624241

Abstract

Bu araştırma, eğitim alanında beyin fırtınası tekniğinin uygulanması, kullanımı veya kullanımını analiz etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, beyin fırtınası tekniği ile ilgili yayınlanmış çalışmaları bibliyometrik analiz ile incelemek ve bu alanda takip edilen yayınları, eğilimleri, atıf ilişkilerini vb. belirlemek ve değerlendirmektir. Bibliyometrik analiz, araştırmaların mevcut durumunu belirlemek için kullanılır ve bibliyometrik veri haritalamasındaki kritik noktalar gelecekteki araştırma eğilimlerini tahmin etmeye yardımcı olabilir, böylece bu alanlarda araştırma yapan bilim insanlarına fayda sağlamak ve yayın, yazar, kaynak, kurum ve ülke bazında istatistiksel bilgi sağlayarak kullanılabilir veri üretmek hedeflenmektedir. Bu nedenle çalışmada beyin fırtınası tekniğinin genel, kavramsal, düşünsel ve toplumsal yapısı verilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, 1981-2022 yılları arasında WoS veri tabanında yayınlanmış beyin fırtınası tekniği ile ilgili 305 makale R programı aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre 218 farklı dergide 803 yazar araştırmalarında beyin fırtınası tekniğini kullanmıştır. Ek olarak, yılda ortalama 9.06 yayın yapılmış ve bu yayınlara yılda makale başına 15.14 atıf yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmalar arasında beyin fırtınası tekniği üzerine en çok yayın yapan yazar Paulus PB olmuştur. Creativity Research Journal, 14 yayınla en çok makale yayınlamıştır. Ülkelere göre en çok yayın Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde yapılmıştır.

Keywords

Bibliyometrik Analiz , Beyin Fırtınası , Sosyal Ağ Analizi , Trendler , Eğitim

Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze the application, utilization or use of brainstorming technique in the education field. The aim of this study is to examine the studies published on the brainstorming technique with bibliometric analysis and to determine and evaluate the publications, trends, citation relationships etc. followed in this field. Bibliometric analysis is used to identify the current status of research and the critical points in bibliometric data mapping can help predict future research trends so it is aimed to benefit scientists doing research in these fields and to produce usable data by providing statistical information on the basis of publications, authors, sources, institutions and countries. Therefore, it is given the general, conceptual, intellectual and social structure of brainstorming technique in the study. In this context, 305 articles on the brainstorming technique published in the WoS database between 1981 and 2022 were analyzed through the R program. According to the analysis results, 803 authors used the brainstorming technique in their research in 218 different journals. Additionally, an average of 9.06 publications were made annually and 15.14 citations per article were made to these publications annually. Among these studies, the author who published the most on the brainstorming technique was Paulus PB. Creativity Research Journal has the most articles published, with 14 publications. In terms of countries, the most publications were made in the United States of America.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis , Brainstorming , Social Network Analysis , Trends , Education

References

• Abumalloh, R. A., Nilashi, M., Ismail, M. Y., Alhargan, A., Alghamdi, A., Alzahrani, A. O., Saraireh, L., Osman, R., & Asadi, S. (2022). Medical image processing and Covid-19: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 15, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.11.013
• Aini, S. D. (2022). Methods of the influence of brainstorming learning on student learning outcomes. The Ellite of Unira, 5 (2).
• Al, U. (2008). Evaluation of scientific publications: h-index and Turkey’s performance. Information World, 9(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2008.307
• Al-Bayati, A. H., & Mizban, A. J. (2022). The effectiveness of brainstorming in the achievement of fourth-grade students in science. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 1506 -1520.
• Alrubai, F. H. (2014). The Effectiveness of the brainstorming technique toward enhancing creative and critical thinking skills among secondary Iraqi physics students. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur.
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
• Asadi, S., & Dahlan, H. M. (2017). Organizational research in the feld of Green IT: a systematic literature review from 2007 to 2016. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 1191–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.009
• Barker, A. & Barker, G. (1997). Beyond brainstorming where to go from here. Direction The Learning Consultancy. Bellia, C., Bacarella, S., & Ingrassia, M. (2022). Interactions between street food and food safety topics in the scientific literature—a bibliometric analysis with science mapping. Foods, 11, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060789
• Benckendorff, P. (2009). Themes and trends in Australian and New Zealand tourism research: a social network analysis of citations in two leading journals (1994–2007). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.1
• Bornmann, L., Mutz, R. & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Are there better iındices for evaluation purposes than the h ındex? a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830-837. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20806
• Byron, K. (2012). Creative reflections on brainstorming. London Review of Education, 10(2), 201- 213.
• Caputo, A., Marzi, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Rialti, R. (2018). Confict management in family businesses: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. International Journal of Confict Management, 29, 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2018-0027
• Cheng, M., Edwards, D., Darcy, S., & Redfern, K. (2018). A tri-method approach to a review of adventure tourism literature: Bibliometric analysis, content analysis, and a quantitative systematic literature review. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 42, 997–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348016640588
• Coon, D. (1983). Introduction to psychology: exploration and application (4th Ed.). Northwest.
• Coskun, H., Gultepe, B., & Yuksel, M. (2015). Creativity stimulating picture and problem relatedness enhance individual brainstorming performance but with different underlying mechanisms [Conference presentation]. 2nd International Symposium on Brain and Cognitive Science, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkiye.
• Dabić, M., Maley, J., Dana, L. P., Novak, I., Pellegrini, M. M., & Caputo, A. (2020). Pathways of SME internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review. Small Business Economics, 55, 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00181-6
• Diehl, M., &Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497- 509.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
• Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
• Florida, R. (2004). The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.
• Forbach, G. B., & Evans, R. G. (1981). The Remote associates test as a predictor of productivity in brainstorming groups. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168100500306
• Garfield, E. (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
• Gong, Z., Lee, L. H., Soomro, S. A., Nanjappan, V., & Georgiev, G. V. (2022). A systematic review of virtual brainstorming from the perspective of creativity: affordances, framework, and outlook. Digital Creativity, 33(2), 96-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2022.2064879
• Gocmen, O., & Coskun, H. (2022). Do de bono's green hat and green-red combination increase creativity in brainstorming on individuals and dyads? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101185
• Grossman, S. R., Rodgers, B. E., & Moore, B. R. (1989). Turn group input into stellaroutput. Working Woman, 36 –38.
• Gul, M. (2013). The role of brainstorming teaching technique in the instruction and retention of geographical concepts: The case of Erzurum (Publication No. 331706) [Masters’s thesis, Atatürk University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
• Hallinger, P., & Wang, R. (2020). The evolution of simulation-based learning across the disciplines, 1965–2018: a science map of the literature. Simulation & Gaming, 51, 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119888246
• Hassanein, H. (2002). Brainstorming Methods. Dar Magdalawi.
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration.
• Hoing, A. (2001). How to promote creative thinking. Early Childhood Today, 15(5), 34-41.
• Hurt, F. (1994). Better brainstorming. Training and Development, 48(11), 57.
• Ibnian, S. S. K. (2011). Brainstorming and essay writing in EFL Class. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.263-272
• Isaksen, S. G. (1998). A review of brainstorming research: six critical issues for inquiry. Creative Research Unit. Problem-Solving Group.
• Isaksen, S. G., & Gaulin, J. P. (2005). A reexamination of brainstorming research: Implications for research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 315-329.
• Karatas, S., & Tonga E. S. (2016). Preservice teachers’ opinions on the use of the SCAMPER (guided brainstorming) technique. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(4), 329–339.
• Kaya, B. (2021). The effect of brainstorming technique on the development of primary school students' artistic creativity (Publication No. 673057) [Masters’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
• Knowles, M. S. (1990). The modern practice of adult education. Educational Technology Publications.
• Kumar, A. (2021). Using brainstorming strategy in developing creative problem solving skills among male students in district kangra of himachal pradesh. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 8(1), 6- 13. https://doi.org/10.48175/568
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10).
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington academy of sciences, 16(12), 317-323.
• Masri, A. A. (2019). The ımpact of using brainstorming in the development of creative thinking and achievement in the english language of the 10th grade students at king abdullah ıı schools of excellence in Amman. International Education Studies, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n2p82
• Mas-Tur, A., Kraus, S., Brandtner, M., Ewert, R., & Kursten, W. (2020). Advances in management research: A bibliometric overview of the review of managerial science. Review of Managerial Science, 14, 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00406-z
• Mohammad, K. H. (2016). Effect of brainstorming strategy students’ performance in the course of EIOI and its relation to some variables. Journal of Literature Language and Linguistics, 20, 81-86.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the Prisma statement. http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/Checklist.aspx
• Nakiboglu, M. (2003). Brainstorming method: from theory to practice. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(3), 341–351.
• Nakiboglu, M., & Altiparmak, M. (2002). Brainstorming as a group discussion method in active learning [Conference presentation]. Paper presented at the 5th National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye.
• National Science Board. (2022). Science and engineering indicators 2022. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221
• Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 1031(02)00500-0
• Ocak, G. (2007). Principles and methods of teaching. Pega Publishing.
• Obafemi, K. E. (2024). Enhancing pupils’ academic performance in mathematics using brainstorming instructional strategy. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v4i2.60053
• Odoh, C. O. (2013). Effects of brainstorming on students’ achievement in senior secondary chemistry. Journal of Qualitative Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.47494/mesb.2020.5.63
• Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Kauchak, D. P., Pendergrass, R. A., Keogh, A. J., & Gibson, H. (1990). Teaching strategies, a guide to better instruction. D. C. Health and Company.
• Osborn, A. F. (1948). Your Creative Power. Charles Scribner's Sons.
• Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. Scribner.
• Ozden, Y. (2003). Learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pegem Publishing.
• Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social in fluence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personallity and Social Psychology, 64(4), 575-586.
• Petrovic, O., & Krickl, O. (1994). Traditional moderated versus computer supported brainstorming-a comperative study. Macmillan.
• Pérez Sánchez, P. A. (2023). Brainstorming techniques and writing skill [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Universidad Técnica de Ambato.
• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
• Putman, V. L. (2001). Effects of additional rules and dominance on brainstorming and decision making [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Universty of Texas.
• Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. English Language Teachers Journal, 61(2), 100-106.
• Rawlinson, J. G. (1981). Creative thinking and brainstorming. Gower Publishing Company.
• Romizowski, A. J. (1986). Designing instructional systems. New York Nichols Publishing.
• Sutisna Y., Rofi’i A., & Kustini, T. (2022). The effectiveness of brainstorming in teaching writing. Papanda Journal of English Education, 1(2), 57-61.
• Suyo-Vega, J. A., Meneses-La-Riva, M. E., Fernández-Bedoya, V. H., Polonia, A. D. C., Miotto, A. I., Alvarado-Suyo, S. A., Ocupa-Cabrera, H. G., & Alarcón-Martínez, M. (2022). Mental health projects for university students: a systematic review of the scientific literature available in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.922017
• Taleb, A., Hamza, H., & Wefky, E. (2013). The effect of using brainstorming strategy on developing creative thinking skills for sixth grade students in science teaching [Conference presentation]. 4th International Conference on e-Learning. Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity Congress, Manama, Bahrain. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECONF.2013.25
• Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390603
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
• Wagbara, S. O. (2020). Effect of brainstorming strategy on senior secondary school students’ academic achievement in chemistry in rivers state, Nigeria. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 4. https://doi.org/10.47494/mesb.2020.5.63
• Wahib, M., & Zidane, N. (2001). Thinking programs, types strategies, methods. Dar Al-Elm for printing and publishing.
• Wosu, U.N. (2023). Brainstorming, field trip and gender effects on junior secondary school students’ attitude to business studies in rivers state, Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 11(3), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.37745/10.37745/bje.2013/vol11n32537
• Yang, E. K., & Lee, J. H. (2020). Cognitive impact of virtual reality sketching on designers’ concept generation. Digital Creativity, 31(2), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2020.1726964
• Yuksel, M., & Coskun, H. (2023). Effect of type and number of visual stimuli on creativity in brainstorming. Kesit Academy Journal, 9(36), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.29228/kesit.71094
• Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: a case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 67(4), 967-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629