Comparison of Some Chemical Properties of Amik, Gavur and Golbasi Lakes Soil’s

Abstract

In this study, were carried out the chemical and total elemental analyses of the wetlands, Amik, Gavur and Golbasi Lakes. Amik Lake has a higher level of degradation and mineralization than the other two lakes. Therefore, the high pH and salt value of the plain soil caused the proportions of calcium carbonate and active crime in the soil to increase, the organic matter level and the altitude to be low. The salinity of the soil is less in the Golbasi Lakes. It is related to geological location and land use as it is related to less degradation of area land. Gavur Lake caused more soil organic matter content to remain under water due to inadequate drainage conditions. The presence of limestone and serpentine as a dominant cation of convertible calcium and magnesium in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, the material transported by the surface waters of the rains falling to the region was considered as the main factor in increasing the concentrations of calcium and magnesium in the lake areas. Golbasi Lake has lower sodium adsorption rate values than the soil of Gavur and Amik Lake soil, it can be said that the degradation of the soil is less and it is the result of the effect of the parent material in the region. In the results of the chemical analysis of three wetlands, Al₂O₃ and SiO₂ were hight found to be insoluble and resistant oxides, elements such as CaO, MgO and Na₂O are soluble and mobile elements, it was obtained as a result of this study that the soil is at high levels.

Keywords

• Eastern Mediterranean,wetland,soil,chemical property

References

1. Abacı Bayan A.A. 2016. Characteristics, Efficiency Levels and Problems of Soils in Wetlands in Eastern Mediterranean Region. Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University, Institute of Science, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, PhD thesis.
2. Altun Gül S. & Karaca A. 2011. Determination of Agricultural Usage Potential of Organic Soils of Denizli-Çivril Gökgöl. Soil And Water Symposium.
3. Altunbaş S. 2005. Investigation of the Degradation Dimensions of Some Wetlands in the Lakes Region at Substrate Level. Doctoral Thesis. Akdeniz University, Institute of Natural Sciences, Department of Soil Science, August.
4. Altunbaş S. & Sarı M. 2011. Relations Between Some Physical Properties and Production Potentials of Soils Gained from Dried Kestel Lake, Akdeniz University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 24 (1):61-65.
5. Amlin G. Suratman M.N. Nadhirah N. & Isa M. 2013. Soil Chemical Analysis of Secondary Forest 30 Years after Logging Activities at Krau Wildlife Reserve, Pahang, Malaysia. ScienceDirect. Pp.75-81.
6. Arslanargun H. 2011. Morphological and Taxonomic Investigations on Some Spathid Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Haptoria) in Wetlands of Van Castle. Graduate thesis. Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Science, Van.
7. Babalola T.S. Oso T. Fasina A.S. & Godonu K. 2011. Land evaluation studies of two wetland soils in Nigeria. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science (ISSN: 2251-0044) Vol. 1(6) pp. 193-204 August.
8. Demiralay İ. 1990. Soil Physical Analysis. Atatürk University Agricultural Faculty Publications No: 143, ss: 131, Erzurum.

9. Erşahin S. Aşkın T. Sünal S. Bender Özenç D. Tarakçıoğlu C. Korkmaz K. Kutlu T. & Dikmen Ü. 2013. Spatial Variability of Colloidal-Alluvial Soils in Central Black Sea Region. III. National Soil and Water Resources Congress 22-24 October.
10. Finlayson C.M. & Davidson N.C. 1996. Global Review of Wetland Resources and Priorities for Wetland Inventory: Project Description and Methodology. Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientists, Jabiru, Australia. International Co-ordination Unit, Wetland International, Wageningen.
11. Gülçur F. 1974. Physical and Chemical Analysis Methods of Soil, Istanbul University Forest Faculty Publications, İ. Ü. Yayın No: 1970, O. F. Yayın No: 201, Kutulmuş Matbaası, İstanbul.
12. Gülsaçan M. 2008. No Wetlands and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Science and Technology Magazine, Science and Technology News, September.
13. Helmke P.A. & Sparks D.L. 1996. Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, and Calcium, in Sparks, D.L., (Ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series Number 5, SSSA., Madison,WI, P:551-574.
14. Horneck D.A. Ellsworth J.W. Hopkins B.G. Sullivan D.M. & Stevens R.G. 2007. Managing SaltAffected Soils for Crop Production. A Pacific Northwest Extension. Oragen State University.
15. Jackson M.L. 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis. Advanced Course. 2nd ed. Published by the Author, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 8955.
16. Kılıç G. Ağca N. & Yalçın M. 2004. Soils of Amik Plain (Turkey): Properties and Classification. Jour. of Agron. 3: 291-295.
17. Korkmaz H. 2005. Effects of the Drying of Amik Lake on Local Climate. MKÜ. BAP. Project, Proje No: 03 F 0701, Antakya.
18. Kuo S. 1996. Phosphorus in D.L. Sparks (Ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series Number 5, SSSA., Madison,WI, P: 869-921.
19. Mahmood I.A. Ali A. Aslam M. Shahzad A. Sultan T. & Hussain F. 2013. Phosphorus Availability in Different Salt-affected Soils as Influenced by Crop Residue Incorporation. Internatıonal Journal Of Agrıculture & Bıology 1814-9596 12-905/2013/15-3-472-478.
20. McNelson D.W. & Sommers L.E. 1996. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. P: 9611011. In D.L. Sparks (ed) Method of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods. Part 3. SSSA, Madison, WI.
21. Olsen S.R. Cole V. Watanabe F.S. & Dean L.A. 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction With Sodium Bicarbonate, USA.
22. Olusegun A.J. & Samuel A.A. 2014. Assessment of soil sediments and salinity status of wetland landscape as affected by climate change in south-western Nigeria. Standard Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences Vol1 (1): 001-009, April.
23. Özesmi U. & Özesmi S. 1997. Definition and Conservation of Wetlands in the United States: For Turkey. III. National Ecology and Environment Congress, Kırşehir, s. 40-42.
24. Reyes J.M. Campillo M.C. & Torrent J. 2006. Soil Properties Influencing Iron Chlorosis in Grapevines Grown in the MontillaMoriles Area, Southern Spain. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 37: 1723-1729.
25. Şenol H. 2012. Physical, Chemical and Mineralogical Properties of Common Large Soil Groups in. PhD Thesis Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Department. Süleyman Demirel University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences-Isparta.
26. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Project for Supporting the Preparation of Master Plan for Provincial Agriculture and Rural Development, Adıyaman Agriculture Master Plan, December,
27. Thomas G.W. 1996. Soil pH and Acidity. pp:475-491. In D.L. Sparks (ed) Method of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods. Part 3. SSSA, Madison, WI.
28. Tüzüner A. 1990. Soil and Water Analysis Laboratories Handbook. T.C. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs General Directorate of Village Services. pp.21-27.
29. Yaalon D.H. 1957. Problems of Soil Testing on Calcareous Soils. Plant and Soil,8,275- 288.
30. Yıldız O. Eşen D. Sargıncı M. &Toprak B. 2008. Change in Carbon Storage Capacity of Soil Eluant Soil Area and Soil, VIII. National Ecology and Environment Congress,20-23 october 2008 Girne/KKTC Vuni Palace Hotel Kongre Merkezi.
31. Yılmaz K. 1990. Mineralogical Characterization of Harran Plain Soils. Doctoral Thesis. Ç. Ü. Institute of Science and Technology, Adana.