Effect of maturity stage on quality and shelf life of tomato (lycopersicon esculentum mill) using refrigerator storage system

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 23 - 44, 30.08.2020

John Famuyini , Olalusi Ayoola Patrick Adewale Sedara

Abstract

Tomatoes (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill) are well known vegetable that contains vitamins, antioxidants and other health beneficial substances. This study evaluates quality (vitamin C, protein, fat, crude fibre, ash content, moisture content, carbohydrate, weight loss, firmness and antioxidant activity) and shelf- life of tomatoes under refrigerator storage method at 10oC using three maturity stages (breaking stage, pale red stage and light red stage) of ‘Beefmaster HYBRID VFNASt’ tomato varieties cultivated in a greenhouse, harvested and stored for 18 days. The physical qualities were determined during storage whilst antioxidant activity (lycopene and carotenoid concentrations) was evaluated before and after 18 days of storage. The results obtained shows that before storage; tomatoes has high moisture content (95.36%) and protein content (1.04%) at breaking stage, highest value of fat content (0.59%) and crude fibre content (1.13%) was recorded at pale red stage, while the highest ash content (0.43%), carbohydrate (3.17%), carotenoid content (0.3272 mg/g), lycopene content (0.7309 mg/g) and vitamin C content (0.1268 mg/g) was recorded at light red stage. An increase was observed in the antioxidant activities and proximate composition after 18 days of storage. The concentration of vitamin C content of tomato fruit after storage compare with the fresh sample is significantly (p<0.05) depends on maturity stages of the tomato fruit. The highest nutritional value (quality and shelf-life) was recorded for breaking stage. The results obtained also shows that carotenoid and vitamin C contents of the tomato fruits slight increase at the end of the storage period in breaking stage and this increase is significantly depends on maturity stage. It was observed that ripening stage has significant influence on the nutritional values which indicate that the ideal maturity stage to maintain optimal shelf life and nutritional quality is breaking stage of tomato fruit which is the most suitable for storage.

Keywords

Tomatoes, Maturity stages, Refrigerator system, Shelf life, Quality

References

• Adebooye, O.C., Adeoye, G.O., Tijani-Eniola, H. (2006). Quality of fruits of three varieties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum (L) Mill) as affected by phosphorus rates. Journal of agronomy, 5,3, 396-400.
• Adubofuor, J., Amankwah, E.A., Arthur, B.S., Appiah, F. (2010). Comparative study related to physic-chemical properties and sensory qualities of tomato juice produced from oranges, tomatoes and carrots. African journal of food science, 4,7, 427-433.
• Agbemafle, R., Owusu-Sekyere, J.D., Bart-Plange, A. (2015). Effect of deficit irrigation and storage on the nutritional composition of tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill. cv. Pectomech). Croatian journal of food technology, biotechnology and nutrition 10,1-2, 59-65.
• Ajayi, I.A, and Oderinde, R.A. (2013). Effects of different home storage conditions and preservation on some chemical constituents of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Journal of applied chemistry, 4 ,4, 19–29.
• Akinci, S. Losel, D.M. (2012). Plant water-stress response and mechanisms. In Rahman, M. I., (ed): Water stress. Intech, shanghai. 1-30.
• Ali, B. and Thompson, K. (1998). Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on postharvest qualities of pink tomatoes. Tr. Journal of Agricultural and forestry. 22, 365 – 372.
• Alvi, S.S., Khan, K.M., Sheikh, M.A. and Shahid, M. (2003). Effect of peeling and cooking on nutrients vegetables. Pakistan journal of nutrtion, 2,3, 189-191.
• AOAC International. (2005). Official methods of analysis. Maryland, USA: AOAC International.
• Batu, A. and Thompson, A.K., (1993). Effects of cross-head speed and probe diameter on instrumental measurement of tomatoes firmness. In Proceedings of the International Conference for Agricultural Machinery and Process Engineering, October, Seoul, Korea 1340–1345, 19–22.
• Beckles, D.M. (2011). Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 63, 1, 129–140.
• Bhattarai, D.R and Gautam, D.M. (2006). Effect of harvesting method and calcium on post-harvest physiology of tomato. Nepal Agric. Res. J. 7, 37 – 41.
• Brummell, D.A. (2006). Cell wall disassembly in ripening fruit. Functional Plant Biology 33, 103-119.
• Chapagain, P.B. and Wiesman, Z. (2004). Effect of potassium magnesium chloride in the fertigation solution as partial source of potassium on growth, yield and quality of greenhouse tomato. Scientia Hort., 99, 279-288.
• Dumas, Y., Dadomo, M., Lucca, G. and Grolier, P. (2003). Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. J. Sci. Food Agric., 83, 369-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1370.
• Emadeldin, H.E.K., Mathilde, C. and Mireille, F. (2012). Cell wall glycosidase activities and protein content variations during fruit development and ripening in three texture contrasted tomato cultivars. Saudi Journal of Biological Science 19,3, 277-283.
• FAO (1992). Manuals of food quality control: chemical analysis. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome.
• Fish, W.W., Perkins-Veazie, P. and Collins, J.K. (2002). A quantitative assay for lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. Journal of Food composition and Analysis, 15, 309-317.
• . Gharezi, M., Joshi, N. and Sadeghian, E. (2012). Effect of postharvest treatment on stored cherry tomatoes. Journal Nutrion and Food Sciences, 2, 8, 157-167.
• Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical procedure for agricultural research, second edition. John willey and sons, New York, 28-92.
• Hanson, P.M., Yang, R.Y., Wu J., Chen, J.T., Ledesma, D. and Tsou, S.C.S. (2004). Variation for antioxidant activity and antioxidants in tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 129, 5, 704-711. Retrieved from http://journal.ashspublications.org/content/129/5/704
• Harvey, T. and Chan, J.R. (1983). Handbook of tropical foods. Marcel Deker Inc. New York & Basel.
• Henry’s (2018). The Henrys’ Plant Farm, 2018 tomato variety list, Horticultural Science journal, 1-7.
• Hossain, M.M. E., Alam, M.J., Hakim, M.A. and Amanullah, A.S.M. (2010). An assessment of physco chemical properties of some tomato genotypes and varieties grown at Rangpur, Bangladesh Res. Pub. J. 4, 3, 135-243.
• Hui, Y.H. (2006). Handbook of fruits and fruit processing. Blackwell Publishing pofessional, Lowa, USA. 36-37.
• Idah, P.A. and Aderibigbe, B.A. (2005). Quality changes in dried tomatoes stored in sealed polythene and open storage systems. Proceedings of Dept of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Minna Niger State, Nigeria.
• Junqueira, A.H., Peetz, M.S. and Onoda, S.M. (2011). Um modelo de inovação na gestão da cadeia de produção e distribuição de hortaliças diferenciadas no Brasil. ESPM, Central de cases. Disponível em: http://www.organicsnet. com.br/wp-content/uploads/sweet_grape.pdf
• Kader, A.A. (2008). Perspective: flavor quality of fruits and vegetables. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 88, 1863-1868.
• Kelebek, H., Sellic, S., Kadiroglu, P., Kola, O., Kesen S., Ucar B. and Çetiner B. (2017). Bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential in tomato pastes as affected by hot and cold break process. Food Chemistry, 220, 31–41.
• Ketelaere, B.J., Lammertyn, G., Molenberghs, M., Desme, B., Nicolai, J. and Baerdemaeker, J. (2004). Tomato cultivar grouping based on firmness change, shelf life and variance during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biology and Tech. 34,2, 187-201
• Malami, D.J. and Mohammed, M.I. (2013). Effect of heat treatment on the lycopene content of tomato Puree. ChemSearch Journal, 4,1, 18-21.
• Maul, E., Sargent, S.A., Sims, C. A., Baldwin, E.A., Balaban, M.O. and Huber, D.J. (2000). Tomato flavor and aroma quality as affected by storage temperature. J. Food Sci., 657, 1228-1237. http://dx.doi.org/jfsv65n7p1228-1237ms19990912.
• Melkamu, M., Seyoum, T. and Woldetsadik, K. (2008). Effects of pre post-harvest treatments on changes in sugar content of tomato, African Journal of Biotechnology 7,8, 1139– 1144.
• Nielsen, S.S. (2002). An Introduction to the Chemical Analysis of Food. Satish Kumar Jain for CBS Publishers and Distributiors, 459611-A, 11 Darya Ganj, New Delhi (India). 83-175.
• Nkansah, G.O., Owusu, E.O., Bonsu, K.O. and Dennis, E.A. (2003). The effect of mulch types on growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.). Ghana Journal of Horticulture, 2, 55-63.
• Ochoa-Velasco, C.E., Valadez-Blanco, R., Salas-Coronado, R., Sustaita-Rivera, F., Hernández-Carlos, B., García-Ortega, S. and Santos-Sánchez, N.F. (2016). Effect of nitrogen fertilization and Bacillus licheniformis biofertilizer addition on the antioxidants compounds and antioxidant activity of greenhouse cultivated tomato. Scientia Horticulturae, 201, 338–345.
• Oko-Ibom, G.O. and Asiegbu, J.E. (2007). Aspects of tomato fruit quality as influenced by cultivar and scheme of fertilizer application,” Journal of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension, 6, 1, 71–81.
• Okolie, N.P. and Sanni, T.E. (2012). Effect of post-harvest treatments on quality of whole tomatoes. Afric. J. Food Sci., 6, 3, 70-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJFS11.188.
• Okorie, S.U., Nwanekezi, E.C. and Okor, O.O. (2004). The quality properties of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) as influenced by processing with a chemical preservative and storage. Nigeria Food Journal, 22, 195-197. ISSN 0189-7241.
• Olaniyi, J., Akanbi, W., Adejumo, T. and Akande, O. (2010). Growth, fruit yield and nutritional quality of tomato varieties. African Journal of Food Science, 4,6, 398- 402.
• Olympio, N. S. and Kukuaih, S. (2002). Preliminery evaluation of post-harvest response of Tomato fruits to soil liming with Calcium Hydroxide. Ghana Journal of Horticulture. 1, 102-107.
• Oms-Oliu G., Hertog M. L. A. T. M., Van de Poel, B., Ampofo-Asiama, J., Geeraerd, A.H. and Nicolaï, B.M. (2011). Metabolic characterization of tomato fruit during pre-harvest development, ripening, and postharvest shelf-life. Postharvest Biol Technol, 62, 7-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.04.010
• Onifade, T.B., Ajayi, A.O., Aregbesola, O.A. and Ige, M.T. (2013). Some physical properties and thin layer drying characteristics of local varieties of tomatoes (lycopersicon lycopersicum). Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 4, 3, 275-279.
• Owusu, J., Haile, M. Wang, Z. and Amissah, A. (2012). Effect of drying methods on physicochemical properties of pretreated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) slices. Journal of Food Technology, Biotechnology and Nutrition 7, 1-2, 106-111.
• Raffo, A., Leonardi, C., Fogliano, V., Ambrosino, P., Salucci, M., Gennaro, L., Bugianesi, R., Giuffrida, F. and Quaglia, G. (2002). Nutritional value of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Cv. Naomi F1) harvested at different ripening stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 6550- 6556.
• Rosales, M.A., Ruiz, J.M., Hernandez J., Soriano T., Castilla N. and Romero L. (2006). Antioxidant content and ascorbate metabolism in cherry tomato exocarp in relation to temperature and solar radiation. J. Sci. Food Agric., 86, 1545-1551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2546
• Siddiqui, M.W. (2015). Postharvest biology and technology of horticultural crops – principles and practices for quality maintenance. USA, 572.
• Sulieman, A.E., Awin, K.M.A. and Yousif, M.T. (2011). Suitability of some tomato (lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes for paste production. Journal of Science and Technology 12, 2, 45-51.
• Terry, P., Giovannucci, E., Michels, K. B., Bergkvist, L., Hansen, H., Holmberg, L. and Wolk, A. (2001). Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber and risk of colorectal cancer. Journal of National Cancer Institute 93, 525-533.
• Thompson, A.k. (1996). Post-harvest technology to fruits and vegetables. Black well science led. Ox-ford. UK, 410
• Tigist, M., Workneh, T. S. and Woldetsadik, K. (2013). Effects of variety on the quality of tomato stored under ambient conditions. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50, 3, 477–486.
• Toor, R.K. and Savage, G P. (2006). Antioxidant activity in different fractions of tomatoes. Food Research International, 38, 487–494.
• Tovionen, P. M. A. (2007). Fruit maturation, ripening and their relationship to quality. Stewart postharvest review, 3, 2 1-5
• USDA (2007). The US and World Situation: Fresh and Processed tomatoes. USDA Foreign Agricultural Services Horticultural and Tropical Products Division. http://www.fas.usda.gov/htp/2007%20Tomatoes.pdf
• USDA (2007) National Nutrient Data Base for Standard Reference. USDA-ARS Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page. Available online: http://www.nal.usda. gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgi-bin/list_nut_edit.pl
• Valverde-Queralt, A., Medina-Remón, A., Andres-Lacueva, C. and Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. (2011). Changes in phenolic profile and antioxidant activity during production of diced tomatoes. Food Chemistry, 126, 1700–1707.
• Vincent, A.R., Manganaris, G.A., Sozzi, G.O. and Crisosto, C. H. (2009). Nutritional quality of fruits and vegetables. In Florkowski, W. J., Shewfelt, R. L., Brueckner, B. and Prussia, S. E. (editors). Postharvest Handling: A Systems Approach. Second Edition. Elsevier Inc. Academic Press
• Vinha, A. F., Soares, M. O., Herdeiro, M. and Machado M. (2012). Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of Portuguese diospyrus kaki fruit by geographical origins. J. Agric. Sci., 4, 2, 281-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n2p281
• Wawrzyniak, A., Marciniak, A. and Rajewska, J. (2005). Lycopene content of selected Foods available on the Polish market and estimation of its intakes. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 14, 55, 195- 200.
• Wills RBH, W.B. McGlasson, D., Grahmam, TH. Lee. and Hall, E.G. (2004). Postharvest. An introduction to the physiology and Handling of Fruits and Vegetables. Granada Publishing Ltd. London. 24.