Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 24 - 32, 30.06.2024

Abstract

References

  • Anonymous 2024. İyi Tarım Uygulamaları, https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Iyi-Tarim-Uygulamalari/Istatistikler
  • Ayres R.U., Van Den Bergh J.C. & Gowdy J.M. 1998. Weak versus strong sustainability (No. 98-103/3). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper
  • Basso B. & Antle J. 2020. Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems. Nature Sustainability. 3(4), 254-256.
  • Cirillo V., Evangelista R., Guarascio D. & Sostero M. 2021. Digitalization, routineness and employment: an exploration on Italian task-based data. Res. Pol., 50 (7), 104079
  • Dudley N. & Alexander S. 2017. Agriculture and biodiversity: A review. Biodiversity. 18(2-3), 45-49.
  • Coulibaly T.P., Du J. & Diakité D. 2021. Sustainable agricultural practices adoption. Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo). 67(4), 166-176
  • Ezrachi A. & Stucke M.E. 2022. Virtual Competition—Ariel Ezrachi, Maurice E. Stucke (n.d.). Retrieved March 7, 2022, from Farley H.M. & Smith Z.A. 2020. Sustainability: if it's everything, is it nothing? Routledge.
  • Gala P., Camargo J., Magacho G. & Rocha I. 2018. Sophisticated jobs matter for economic complexity: an empirical analysis based on input-output matrices and employment data Struct. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 45, 1-8
  • Ha L.T. & Thanh T.T. 2022. Effects of digital public services on trades in green goods: does institutional quality matter? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7 (1), 100168 https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=978067454547
  • Kuhlman T. & Farrington J. 2010. What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2 (11), 3436-3448
  • McNeill D. 2019. The contested discourse of sustainable agriculture. Global Policy. 10, 16-27.
  • Pretty J.N., Thompson J. & Hinchcliffe F. 1996. Sustainable Agriculture: Impacts on Food Production and Challenges for Food Security. International Institute for Environment and Development. Roy V. & Singh S. 2017. Mapping the business focus in sustainable production and consumption literature: review and research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 150, 224-236.
  • Sumberg J. & Giller K.E. 2022. What is ‘conventional’ agriculture?. Global Food Security. 32, 100617
  • Velten S., Leventon J., Jager N. & Newig J. 2015. What is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability, 7(6), 7833-7865.
  • Wu C.H., Tsai S.B., Liu W., Shao X.F. & Sun R., Wacławek M. 2021. Eco-technology and eco-innovation for green sustainable growth. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S 28(1), 7-10.
  • Zhang Y., Ren S., Liu Y. & Si S. 2017. A big data analytics architecture for cleaner manufacturing and maintenance processes of complex products. Journal of Cleaner Production. 142, 626-641.

Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 24 - 32, 30.06.2024

Abstract

Environmentally sustainable development and agricultute strive to integrate ecological practices into life, fostering a culture of environmental responsibility among people. In these sustainable cities efforts are made to reduce the ecological footprint by implementing energy-efficient technologies, waste reduction strategies, eco friendy production of agricultural products and green agriculture applications. Renewable energy sources, such as solar panels and wind turbines, are often incorporated to meet energy needs while minimizing the impact on the environment. Biodiversity conservation is another focus area, with green spaces, native plantings, and wildlife-friendly landscaping contributing to the overall ecological balance. Sustainable development and construction practices are aiming to achieve energy efficiency and minimize resource consumption. Green agricultural building certifications and eco-friendly materials contribute to the creation of environmentally responsible infrastructure. In the modern era, the concept of sustainable agricultural buildings has emerged as a transformative force, leveraging technology to enhance urban living. This paradigm shift is characterized by the integration of information and communication technologies to optimize various aspects of city life, including mobility, health, safety, and productivity. The doubling of technology investments in these cities from 2018 to the present demonstrates a concerted effort to reduce costs, minimize environmental impact, and enhance internal city efficiency. As interested cities continue to join the movement, the smart cities that integrated with sustainable agriculte activities market share is anticipated to be seven times larger by 2030 compared to the present day. The ongoing technological revolution in these cities force shaping the future of urban living. This study provides examples of sustainable city applications implemented in recent years globally.

References

  • Anonymous 2024. İyi Tarım Uygulamaları, https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Iyi-Tarim-Uygulamalari/Istatistikler
  • Ayres R.U., Van Den Bergh J.C. & Gowdy J.M. 1998. Weak versus strong sustainability (No. 98-103/3). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper
  • Basso B. & Antle J. 2020. Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems. Nature Sustainability. 3(4), 254-256.
  • Cirillo V., Evangelista R., Guarascio D. & Sostero M. 2021. Digitalization, routineness and employment: an exploration on Italian task-based data. Res. Pol., 50 (7), 104079
  • Dudley N. & Alexander S. 2017. Agriculture and biodiversity: A review. Biodiversity. 18(2-3), 45-49.
  • Coulibaly T.P., Du J. & Diakité D. 2021. Sustainable agricultural practices adoption. Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo). 67(4), 166-176
  • Ezrachi A. & Stucke M.E. 2022. Virtual Competition—Ariel Ezrachi, Maurice E. Stucke (n.d.). Retrieved March 7, 2022, from Farley H.M. & Smith Z.A. 2020. Sustainability: if it's everything, is it nothing? Routledge.
  • Gala P., Camargo J., Magacho G. & Rocha I. 2018. Sophisticated jobs matter for economic complexity: an empirical analysis based on input-output matrices and employment data Struct. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 45, 1-8
  • Ha L.T. & Thanh T.T. 2022. Effects of digital public services on trades in green goods: does institutional quality matter? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7 (1), 100168 https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=978067454547
  • Kuhlman T. & Farrington J. 2010. What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2 (11), 3436-3448
  • McNeill D. 2019. The contested discourse of sustainable agriculture. Global Policy. 10, 16-27.
  • Pretty J.N., Thompson J. & Hinchcliffe F. 1996. Sustainable Agriculture: Impacts on Food Production and Challenges for Food Security. International Institute for Environment and Development. Roy V. & Singh S. 2017. Mapping the business focus in sustainable production and consumption literature: review and research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 150, 224-236.
  • Sumberg J. & Giller K.E. 2022. What is ‘conventional’ agriculture?. Global Food Security. 32, 100617
  • Velten S., Leventon J., Jager N. & Newig J. 2015. What is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability, 7(6), 7833-7865.
  • Wu C.H., Tsai S.B., Liu W., Shao X.F. & Sun R., Wacławek M. 2021. Eco-technology and eco-innovation for green sustainable growth. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S 28(1), 7-10.
  • Zhang Y., Ren S., Liu Y. & Si S. 2017. A big data analytics architecture for cleaner manufacturing and maintenance processes of complex products. Journal of Cleaner Production. 142, 626-641.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Land Use and Environmental Planning, Agricultural Systems Analysis and Modelling
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ceren Unlukal This is me

Gokhan Onder Erguven This is me

Early Pub Date June 27, 2024
Publication Date June 30, 2024
Submission Date May 29, 2024
Acceptance Date June 15, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Unlukal, C., & Erguven, G. O. (2024). Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(1), 24-32.
AMA Unlukal C, Erguven GO. Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal. EJAR. June 2024;8(1):24-32.
Chicago Unlukal, Ceren, and Gokhan Onder Erguven. “Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 8, no. 1 (June 2024): 24-32.
EndNote Unlukal C, Erguven GO (June 1, 2024) Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 8 1 24–32.
IEEE C. Unlukal and G. O. Erguven, “Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal”, EJAR, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2024.
ISNAD Unlukal, Ceren - Erguven, Gokhan Onder. “Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 8/1 (June 2024), 24-32.
JAMA Unlukal C, Erguven GO. Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal. EJAR. 2024;8:24–32.
MLA Unlukal, Ceren and Gokhan Onder Erguven. “Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 8, no. 1, 2024, pp. 24-32.
Vancouver Unlukal C, Erguven GO. Smart Agricultural Approach and Good Agricultural Practices in Sustainable Development Goal. EJAR. 2024;8(1):24-32.
Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research (EJAR)   ISSN: 2636-8226   Web: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejar   e-mail: agriculturalresearchjournal@gmail.com