Öksin bölgesinde plantasyon yapılan ve tahribata uğramamış ormanlarda bir Akdeniz türünün (Arbutus unedo) yaprak karakterleri

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 67 - 72, 06.12.2019

Hakan Yılmaz , Hamdi Güray Kutbay , Burak Sürmen

Abstract

Bu araştırmada Arbutus unedo'nun farklı orman
habitatlarındaki yaprak özellikleri karşılaştırıldı., Spesifik yaprak alanı ve spesifik
yaprak ağılrığı yaprak karakterleridir. Bu karakterler ekosistem dinamiği için
çok önemli yaprak özellikleridir. SLA ve LMA, çevreye karşı verilen tepkide ve
bitki fonksiyonları üzerindeki etkilerde (örneğin; yaprak besinleri ve ekonomisi,
atmosfer ile gaz alışverişi vb.) önemlidir. A.
unedo, doğal olarak Avrupa-Sibirya floristik bölgesinde yetişen bir Akdeniz
enklav türüdür. A. unedo'nun yaprak
özellikleri doğal ve P. pinaster
ekili ormanlarda incelenmiştir. Vejetasyon dönemi boyunca ormanlardan yaprak
örnekleri toplandı ve SLA ve LMA değerleri hesaplandı. Doğal ormandaki ortalama
SLA değerlerinin P. pinaster ekili
ormandan yüksek olduğu, P. pinaster
ekili ormanda, LMA değerlerinin doğal ormandan yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Fakat
orman habitatları arasında istatistiksel olarak fark bulunmadığı tespit
edilmiştir.

Keywords

Spesifik yaprak alanı ve ağırlığı, habitat tipleri, ekosistem dinamiği, kanopi yoğunluğu

The leaf traits of a Mediterranian species (Arbutus unedo L.) in an undisturbed and planted forests in Euxine Region

Abstract

We compared the leaf traits of Arbutus unedo in different forest
habitats in this research. Leaf traits are spesific leaf area and specific leaf
mass. These traits are very important leaf features in ecosystem dynamics. SLA
and LMA response to environment and effect on plant functions (i.e. leaf
nutrients and economy, gas exchanges with atmosphere and etc.). A. unedo is a mediterranian enclave
species, naturally growing in Euro-Siberian floristic region. Leaf traits of A. unedo were investigated on a natural
and P.pinaster planted forest. We
collected leaves during vegetation period from forests and calculated SLA and
LMA values. We found that mean SLA values in natural forest are high than the P. pinaster planted forest and LMA
values in P. pinaster planted forest
are high than the natural forest. But statistical differences were not found
between forest habitats.

Keywords

Spesific leaf area and mass, habitat types, ecosystem dynamic

References

• Sellin A 2001. Morphological and stomatal responses of Norway spruce foliage to irradiance within a canopy depending on shoot age. Environ Exp Bot 45: 115-131.
• Anonim 2003. Leaf Area Measurement 1.3. The University of Sheffield, UK.
• Anonim 2008. SPSS 17.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., New York.
• Boerner REJ, Koslowsky SD 1989. Microsite variations in soil chemistry and nitrogen mineralization in a beechmaple forest. Soil Biol Biochem 21: 795-801.
• Davis PH 1978. Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands. Edinburg Univ.
• Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint JP 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85: 2630-2637.
• Wang G 2007. Leaf trait co-variation, respond and effect in a chronosequence. J Veg Sci 18(4): 563-570.
• Gratani L, Ghia E 2002. Adaptive strategy at the leaf level of Arbutus unedo L. to cope with Mediterranean climate. Flora 197(4): 275-284.
• Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Garnier E, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee W, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Villar R, Warton DI, Westoby M 2005. Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytol 166(2): 485-496.
• Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen M, Diemer J, Flexas E, Garnier PK, Groom J, Gulias JHC, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428(6985): 821.
• Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardized and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51(4): 335-380.
• Jullien A, Allirand JM, Mathieu A, Andrieu B, Ney B 2009. Variations in leaf mass per area according to N nutrition, plant age, and leaf position reflect ontogenetic plasticity in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crop Res 114(2): 188-197.
• Jurik WT 1986. Temporal and spatial patterns of specific leaf weight in successional northern hardwood tree species. Amer J Bot 73(8): 1083-1092.
• Karadeniz T, Kurt H, Kalkışım Ö 1996. Yomra (Trabzon) çevresinde yetişen kocayemiş (Arbutus unedo L.) tiplerinin meyve özellikleri üzerinde çalışmalar. YYÜZF Dergisi. 6(4): 65-70.
• Korkmaz H, Yalcın E, Kutbay HG, Berk E, Bılgın A 2008. Contribution to the knowledge of the syntaxonomy and ecology of macchie and forest vegetation in Paphlagonia, North Anatolia, Turkey. Acta Bot. Gallica 155: 495-512.
• Kutbay HG, Yalçın E, Bilgin A 2003. Foliar N and P resorption and foliar nutrient concentrations in canopy and subcanopy of a Fagus orientalis Lipsky forest. Belg J Bot 136: 35-44.
• Lavorel S, Díaz S, Cornelissen JHC, Garnier E, Harrison SP, McIntyre S, Pausas JG, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Roumet C, Urcelay C 2006. Plant functional types; are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? In: Canadell J, Pitelka LF, Pataki D (Ed.), Terresterial ecosystems in an changing world. Heidelbeg: Springer – Verlag.
• Milla R, Castro-Diez P, Montserrat-Marti G 2009. Phenology of Mediterranean woodyplants from NE Spain: Synchrony, seasonality and relationships among phenophases. Flora 205: 190-199
• Misson L, Tu KP, Boniello RA, Goldstein AH 2006. Seasonality of photosynthetic parameters in a multi-specific and vertically complex forest ecosystem in the Sierra Nevada of California. Tree Physiol 26: 729-741.
• Kraft NJB, Valencia R, Ackerly DD 2008. Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an amazonian forest. Science 322(5901): 580-582.
• Nouvellon Y, Laclau JP, Epron D, Kinana A, Mabiala A, Roupsard O, Bonnefond JM, le Maire G, Marsden C, Bontemps JD, Saint-Andre´L 2010. Within-stand and seasonal variations of specific leaf area in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation in the Republic of Congo. Forest Ecol Manag 259: 1796-1807.
• Orgeas J, Ourcival JM, Bonin G 2002. Seasonal and spatial patterns of foliar nutrient in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) growing on siliceous soils in province (France), Plant Ecol 164: 201-211.
• Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS 1992. Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62(3): 365-392.
• Prior LD, Bowman DMJS, Eamus D 2004. Seasonal differences in leaf attribute in Australian tropical tree species: family and habitat comparisons. Funct Ecol 18: 707-718.
• Milla R; Reich PB 2008. Environmental and developmental controls on specific leaf area are little modified by leaf allometry. Funct Ecol 22(4): 565-576.
• Sperlich D, Chang CT, Peñuelas J, Gracia C, Sabate S 2015. Seasonal variability of foliar photosynthetic and morphological traits and drought impacts in a Mediterranean mixed forest. Tree physiol 35(5): 501-520.
• Turner NC, Schulze ED, Nicolle D, Schumacher J, Kuhlmann I 2008. Annual rainfall does not directly determine the carbon isotope ratio of leaves of Eucalyptus species. Physiol Plant 132: 440-445.
• van Heerwaarden LM, Toet S, Aerts R 2003. Current measures of nutrient resorption efficiency lead to a substantial underestimation of real resorption efficiency: facts and solutions. Oikos 101: 664-669.
• Varol Ö 2003. Flora of Başkonuş Mountain (Kahramanmaraş). Turk J Bot 27: 117-139.
• Walters MB, Kruger EL, Reich PB 1993. Growth, biomass distribution and CO2 exchange of northern hardwood seedlings in high and low light: relationships with successional status and shade tolerance. Oecologia 94: 7-16.
• Wright IJ, Westoby M 2003. Nutrient concentration, resorption and lifespan: leaf traits of Australian sclerophyll species, Funct Ecol 17: 10-19.
• Yılmaz H 2009. Ünye Asarkaya ormanındaki baskın ağaç ve çalı türlerinde azot ve fosfor geri alınımı. Ondokuz Mayıs ÜniversitesiFen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun.
• Yılmaz H, Kutbay HG, Kiliç DD, Surmen B 2014. Foliar nitrogen and phosphorus resorption in an undisturbed and Pinus pinaster Ait. planted forests in Northern Turkey. Rev Écol (Terre Vie) 69: 39-48.
• Sürmen B, Kutbay HG, Çakmak A, Yılmaz H 2016. Comparison of Leaf Traits (SLA And LMA) on Different Populations of Alcea apterocarpa. Hacettepe J Biol Chem 44(2): 125–131.