Clinical Research

Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department

Volume: 6 Number: 1 May 2, 2024
EN

Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Glasgow coma scale (GCS), GCS-motor component (mGCS), and FOUR (Full Outline of Un-responsiveness) Scores in predicting the prognosis of patients who presented to the emergency department with head trauma. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, was obtained to collected data of patients with head trauma, who presented to the emergency department. Participants’ demographic data, medical history, GCS, FOUR scores, the duration of emergency department stays, as well as 24-hour, 7-day, and 28-day mortality rates were recorded on the case report forms. Results: Data from 302 patients were used to develop a risk score for detecting significant brain pathology via computed tomography (CT) scans. The regression model, incorporating total GCS and sex-based variables, explained 22.5% of variance and accurately classified 91.1% of cases. The model's area under the curve for detecting significant pathology via CT was 0.714. Conclusion: GCS, mGCS, and FOUR scores did not achieve the necessary the diagnostic performance benchmark to be used alone to predict or exclude clinically significant brain injury in patients with head trauma.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Rutland-Brown W, Langlois JA, Thomas KE, Xi YL. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(6):544-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200611000-00009
  2. 2. Meral Atis G, Altay T, Atis ŞE. Comparison of CATCH, PECARN, and CHALICE clinical decision rules in pediatric patients with mild head trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 01 August 2022;48(4):3123-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01859-x
  3. 3. Puskulluoglu S, Acikalin A, Ay M, Kozaci N, Avci A, Gulen M, vd. Analysis of Adult Trauma Patients Admitted to Emergency Department. Cukurova Med J. 30 September 2015;40(3):569-79. https://doi.org/10.17826/cutf.68238
  4. 4. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Clement C, Lesiuk H, Laupacis A, vd. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet Lond Engl.05 May 2001;357(9266):1391-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04561-x 5. Stein SC, Fabbri A, Servadei F, Glick HA. A critical comparison of clinical decision instruments for computed tomographic scanning in mild closed traumatic brain injury in adolescents and adults. Ann Emerg Med. February 2009;53(2):180-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.002
  5. 6. Kasprowicz M, Burzynska M, Melcer T, Kubler A. A comparison of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) in predictive modelling in traumatic brain injury. Br J Neurosurg. 03 March 2016;30(2):211-20. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2016.1161173
  6. 7. Okasha AS, Fayed AM, Saleh AS. The FOUR score predicts mortality, endotracheal intubation and ICU length of stay after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. December 2014;21(3):496-504. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-014-9995-6
  7. 8. Kupas DF, Melnychuk EM, Young AJ. Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Component (“Patient Does Not Follow Commands”) Performs Similarly to Total Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting Severe Injury in Trauma Patients. Ann Emerg Med. December 2016;68(6):744-750.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.017
  8. 9. Gill MR, Reiley DG, Green SM. Interrater reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. February 2004;43(2):215-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00814-x

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Emergency Medicine

Journal Section

Clinical Research

Publication Date

May 2, 2024

Submission Date

January 28, 2024

Acceptance Date

April 7, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Şentürk, M., Bozan, Ö., Karaaslan, E. B., Ferhatlar, M. E., Koca, Y., Demirel, A., Kurnaz, D., & Kalkan, A. (2024). Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care, 6(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1426948
AMA
1.Şentürk M, Bozan Ö, Karaaslan EB, et al. Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department. Eurasian j Crit Care. 2024;6(1):1-6. doi:10.55994/ejcc.1426948
Chicago
Şentürk, Mücahit, Öner Bozan, Edip Burak Karaaslan, et al. 2024. “Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients With Head Trauma in the Emergency Department”. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care 6 (1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1426948.
EndNote
Şentürk M, Bozan Ö, Karaaslan EB, Ferhatlar ME, Koca Y, Demirel A, Kurnaz D, Kalkan A (May 1, 2024) Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care 6 1 1–6.
IEEE
[1]M. Şentürk et al., “Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department”, Eurasian j Crit Care, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, May 2024, doi: 10.55994/ejcc.1426948.
ISNAD
Şentürk, Mücahit - Bozan, Öner - Karaaslan, Edip Burak - Ferhatlar, Mehmet Esat - Koca, Yavuzselim - Demirel, Ahmet - Kurnaz, Dorukhan - Kalkan, Asım. “Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients With Head Trauma in the Emergency Department”. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care 6/1 (May 1, 2024): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1426948.
JAMA
1.Şentürk M, Bozan Ö, Karaaslan EB, Ferhatlar ME, Koca Y, Demirel A, Kurnaz D, Kalkan A. Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department. Eurasian j Crit Care. 2024;6:1–6.
MLA
Şentürk, Mücahit, et al. “Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients With Head Trauma in the Emergency Department”. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care, vol. 6, no. 1, May 2024, pp. 1-6, doi:10.55994/ejcc.1426948.
Vancouver
1.Mücahit Şentürk, Öner Bozan, Edip Burak Karaaslan, Mehmet Esat Ferhatlar, Yavuzselim Koca, Ahmet Demirel, Dorukhan Kurnaz, Asım Kalkan. Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department. Eurasian j Crit Care. 2024 May 1;6(1):1-6. doi:10.55994/ejcc.1426948