Letter to Editor

Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis

Volume: 8 Number: 2 August 10, 2026
EN TR

Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis

Abstract

This letter discusses methodological concerns regarding the use of diagnostic and prognostic pulmonary embolism scoring systems for predicting thrombolysis requirement in acute pulmonary embolism patients.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Ebor J, Rangnani A, Rani JN, Ganesan P. The role of standard scoring systems in predicting early thrombolysis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care. 2026;8(1):1-7.
  2. 2. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the model’s utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416-420.
  3. 3. Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(3):165-171.
  4. 4. Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1383-1389.
  5. 5. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543-603.
  6. 6. Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K, et al.; PERT Consortium. Diagnosis, treatment and follow up of acute pulmonary embolism: consensus practice from the PERT Consortium. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019;25:1076029619853037.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Emergency Medicine

Journal Section

Letter to Editor

Publication Date

August 10, 2026

Submission Date

May 15, 2026

Acceptance Date

July 8, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 8 Number: 2

APA
Aykut, A. (2026). Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care, 8(2), 109-110. https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1951605
AMA
1.Aykut A. Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis. Eurasian j Crit Care. 2026;8(2):109-110. doi:10.55994/ejcc.1951605
Chicago
Aykut, Ahmet. 2026. “Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis”. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care 8 (2): 109-10. https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1951605.
EndNote
Aykut A (August 1, 2026) Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care 8 2 109–110.
IEEE
[1]A. Aykut, “Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis”, Eurasian j Crit Care, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 109–110, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.55994/ejcc.1951605.
ISNAD
Aykut, Ahmet. “Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis”. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care 8/2 (August 1, 2026): 109-110. https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1951605.
JAMA
1.Aykut A. Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis. Eurasian j Crit Care. 2026;8:109–110.
MLA
Aykut, Ahmet. “Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis”. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care, vol. 8, no. 2, Aug. 2026, pp. 109-10, doi:10.55994/ejcc.1951605.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Aykut. Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis. Eurasian j Crit Care. 2026 Aug. 1;8(2):109-10. doi:10.55994/ejcc.1951605