Migration of Intrauterine Device and Acute Abdomen
Year 2020,
Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 207 - 210, 26.08.2020
Abdullah Ercan
,
Abdullah Kama
Abstract
Intrauterine device (IUD) is one of the most common used contraseptive methods. Although it has minimal side effects, it can rarely cause uterine perforation. In addition, it can damage neighboring organs by migration to the abdominal or pelvic cavity. In this report we present a case with an acute abdominal condition due to a migrating IUD. It is rarely seen and can be fatal if missed.
References
- 1. Ertopçu K. Intrauterin device. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst-Special Topics. 2012;5(1):37-42.
- 2. Grimaldi L, DeGeorgio F, Andreotta P, D Alessio MC, Piscicelli C, Pascali VL. Mediolegal aspect of an unusual uterine perforation with multiload-Cu 375 R. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2005; 26: 365-6.
- 3. Boortz HE, Margolis DJ, Ragavendra N, Patel MK, Kadell BM. Migration of intrauterine devices: Radiologic findings and implications for patient care. Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):335-52.
- 4. Akpınar F, Özgür EN, Yılmaz S, Ustaoğlu O. Sigmoid colon migration of an intrauterine device. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 2014: 207659.
- 5. Cheung ML, Rezai S, Jackman JM, Patel ND, Bernaba BZ, Hakimian O et al. Retained intrauterine device (iud): triple case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec 5;2018:9362962.
- 6. Esfahani MR, Abdar A. Unusual migration of intrauterine device into bladder and calculus formation. Urology Journal. 2007;4(1):49-51.
- 7. Koca YS, Yıldız I, Yılmaz E. A rare cause of acute abdomen : intrauterine device. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine. 2014;5(3):339-41.
- 8. Toy H, Vural M, Camuzcuoğlu H, Aydın H. Kayıp rahim içi araçların yönetimi ve komplikasyonlar. Düzce Tıp Dergisi 2010;12(3):15-8.
- 9. World Health Organization (1987). Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO scientific group. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO Technical Report Series No. 753).
Year 2020,
Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 207 - 210, 26.08.2020
Abdullah Ercan
,
Abdullah Kama
References
- 1. Ertopçu K. Intrauterin device. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst-Special Topics. 2012;5(1):37-42.
- 2. Grimaldi L, DeGeorgio F, Andreotta P, D Alessio MC, Piscicelli C, Pascali VL. Mediolegal aspect of an unusual uterine perforation with multiload-Cu 375 R. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2005; 26: 365-6.
- 3. Boortz HE, Margolis DJ, Ragavendra N, Patel MK, Kadell BM. Migration of intrauterine devices: Radiologic findings and implications for patient care. Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):335-52.
- 4. Akpınar F, Özgür EN, Yılmaz S, Ustaoğlu O. Sigmoid colon migration of an intrauterine device. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 2014: 207659.
- 5. Cheung ML, Rezai S, Jackman JM, Patel ND, Bernaba BZ, Hakimian O et al. Retained intrauterine device (iud): triple case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec 5;2018:9362962.
- 6. Esfahani MR, Abdar A. Unusual migration of intrauterine device into bladder and calculus formation. Urology Journal. 2007;4(1):49-51.
- 7. Koca YS, Yıldız I, Yılmaz E. A rare cause of acute abdomen : intrauterine device. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine. 2014;5(3):339-41.
- 8. Toy H, Vural M, Camuzcuoğlu H, Aydın H. Kayıp rahim içi araçların yönetimi ve komplikasyonlar. Düzce Tıp Dergisi 2010;12(3):15-8.
- 9. World Health Organization (1987). Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO scientific group. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO Technical Report Series No. 753).