Investigation of The Factors Affecting the Vaccine Preferences of Pre-Hospital Emergency Healthcare Professionals

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 31 - 37, 02.05.2024

Emine Onay , Gül Özlem Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1457138

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the factors affecting the vaccine preferences of prehospital emergency health workers and the status of vaccine opposition.
Materials and Methods: This study was planned as a descriptive study to examine the factors affecting the vaccine preferences of prehospital emergency health care workers working in 112 emergency health services stations and command and control centers affiliated to the Ministry of Health in Aydın province between April 2022 and January 2023, their anti-vaccine status and their attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccine. The population of the study consisted of physicians, emergency medical technicians/technicians (ATT/Paramedics) and ambulance drivers (drivers) working in 112 emergency health services stations and command control centers affiliated to the Ministry of Health in Aydın province (N: 577). The sample selection method was not used and it was aimed to reach the whole population. Data were collected by sending online questionnaire forms to social media groups. The Case Report Form consisting of 12 (twelve) questions including socio-demographic characteristics such as age, gender, educational status, Attitudes Towards Covid-19 Vaccine Scale and Anti-Vaccine Scale were used. The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the SPSS for Windows 25.0 program.
Findings: The population of the study was 577 people. 89.7% (n:427) people participated in our study. 51.5% (n:220) of the participants were female. 48.9% (n:209) were found to have Covid-19 infection. 95.8% (n:427) of the participants were vaccinated. Among the vaccinated participants, 70.4% (n:288) received Biontech, 70.4% (n:288) received Sinovac and 5.1% (n:21) received Turkovac vaccine types.
When the scores of the attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccine scale and its dimensions were compared according to the descriptive characteristics of the participants, it was found that the positive attitude dimension scores of male participants (3.81) were higher than those of female participants (3.51). It was determined that the positive attitude dimension scores of the participants with chronic diseases and the participants who were vaccinated, and the positive attitude dimension scores of the participants whose vaccine type was Biontech, Sinovac and Turkovak were higher than those of the participants who were not vaccinated. It was determined that the positive attitude dimension and attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccine scale scores of the participants whose vaccine dose was three doses and more were higher than the participants whose vaccine dose was one dose and two doses, and the positive attitude dimension and attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccine scale scores of the participants who had a death due to Covid-19 infection in the family or close environment were higher than those of the participants who did not.
According to the findings of our study, the view that there is no vaccine protection in those with chronic diseases has a higher score. Participants who did not have Covid-19 infection, who were not vaccinated, and who had no death loss in their close environment had higher scores on the anti-vaccination scale.
Conclusion: In this study, which examined the hesitancy of prehospital emergency healthcare workers about Covid-19 vaccination, it was found that Covid-19 vaccines were administered at a very high rate. However, it was also found that 4.2% of the employees had high hesitation about vaccines and were not vaccinated. Pre-hospital emergency healthcare workers have an important role and responsibility in the acceptance of Covid-19 vaccine by the public and other healthcare professionals, as in other disaster situations. In a pandemic, vaccination of all members of the society is necessary for the control of the pandemic. For this reason, scientific studies should be conducted for emergency healthcare workers who are not vaccinated and who are hesitant about vaccines, including basic concerns about vaccines and examining potential side effects of vaccines. Training programs should be organized to ensure that healthcare workers are vaccinated with existing Covid-19 vaccines.

Keywords

Prehospital personnel, Covid 19, Pandemic, Vaccine refusal

References

• Al-Shagsi, S. (2010). Models of International Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Systems. Oman Medical Journal, 25, 4, 20-29.
• Altınbaş, Y., & İster D. (2019). Sağlık Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Tamamlayıcı ve Alternatif Tedaviler Hakkındaki Görüş, Bilgi ve Uygulamaları. Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi, 2(1), 47-60.
• Başkaya, E.,& Kaya, Ç. (2023). Bireylerin Aşılara Yönelik Tutumları Üzerine Covid-19 Korkusunun Etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 16(1), 27-38.
• Barutçu, A., Ezgi, Ç. A. Y., & Evliyaoğlu, N. (2021). Çiçek hastalığı epidemisinden Covid-19 pandemisine; aşı kararsızlığı ve aşı reddi. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi, 30(4), 243-250.
• Betsch, C. (2011). Innovations in communication: the Internet and the psychology of vaccination decisions. Eurosurveillance, 16(17), 19849.
• Çankal, G. (2021). Sosyal medyada Turkovac aşısına ilişkin self-oryantalist söylemler. Medya ve Din Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 223-235.
• Civelek B, Yazici O, Ozdemir N, Karacin C, Surel AA. Attitudes of physicians towards Covid-19 vaccines and reasons of vaccine hesitancy in Turkey. Int J Clin Pract. 26 Mayıs 2021;n/a(n/a):e14399.
• Dube, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications. Expert review of vaccines, 14(1), 99-117.
• Durduran, Y., Aktuğ-Demir, N., Demir, L. S., Kandemir, B., Duman, İ., & Yücel, M. (2022). Pandeminin Bir Yıl Sonrasında Covid-19 Aşısına Toplumsal Yaklaşım. Klimik Journal/Klimik Dergisi, 35(3).
• Düzel, B.,& Doğan, M. M. (2022). Covid-19 salgını özelinde aşı kararsızlığı: Bitlis örneği. NOSYON: Uluslararası Toplum ve Kültür Çalışmaları Dergisi, (9), 96-114.
• Erkekoğlu, P., Köse, S. B. E., Balcı, A., & Yirün, A. (2020). Aşı kararsızlığı ve Covid-19’un etkileri. Literatür Eczacılık Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 208-220.
• Geniş, B., Gürhan, N., Koç, M., Geniş, Ç., Şirin, B., Çırakoğlu, O. C., & Coşar, B. (2020). Development of perception and attitude scales related with Covid-19 pandemia. Pearson Journal of Social Sciences-Humanities, 5(7), 306-328.
• Gürbüz, Y., Tütüncü, E. E., Şencan, İ., Şendağ, E., Callak, F., Sevinç, G., & Tekin, A. (2013). İnfluenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemisinde hastane çalışanlarının grip aşısına yaklaşımlarının araştırılması. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, (1), 12-17.
• Jung, S. J.,& Jun, J. Y. (2020). Mental Health and Psychological Intervention Amid Covid-19 Outbreak: Perspectives from South Korea. Yonsei Medical Journal, 61(4), 271-272.
• Kalkan, Y., Türkkan, A., Dönmez, S., & Kayihan, P. A. L. A. (2022). Bir kamu kurumu çalışanlarında Covid-19 aşı tutumu ve ilişkili etmenler. Turkish Journal of Public Health, 20(3), 391-409.
• Karaman, D., Yılmaz, D., & Yılmaz, H. (2021). İntörn hemşirelik öğrencilerinin Koronavirüs (Covid19) korkusunun aşı karşıtlığına etkisinin incelenmesi. The Journal of Turkish Family Physician, 12(4), 179-191.
• Kaya O. (2021) Covid-19 Aşıları. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 28(Covid-19 Özel Sayı): 31-35.
• Kınalı, G., Örgev, B. K., Örgev, C., Topal, B., & Şahin, H. (2022). Aşı okuryazarlığı ve Covid-19 pandemisinde yaşama yansıyan tereddüt, aşı reddi ve aşı karşıtlığı üzerine bir araştırma. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (38), 462-472.
• Koçak, E. N.,& Canbaz, S. (2022). Sağlık Çalışanlarının Covid-19 Aşısı Yaptırmama Nedenlerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Nitel Bir Çalışma. Uzmanlık Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, İstanbul. Salar, T. (2022). Hastane Öncesi Acil Sağlık Çalışanlarının Karşılaştığı Mesleki Riskler ve Risk Yönetimi. GAB Akademi, 2(3), 72-92.
• Salali GD, Uysal MS. Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy is associated with beliefs on the origin of the novel coronavirus in the UK and Turkey. Psychological Medicine 2020; 19:1-3.
• Salmon DA, Dudley MZ, Brewer J, Kan L, Gerber JE, Budigan H et al. Covid-19 vaccination attitudes, values and intentions among United States adults prior to emergency use authorization. Vaccine 2021;39(19):2698-711.
• Soares P, Rocha JV, Moniz M, Gama A, Laires PA, Pedro AR, et el.,( 2021 ).Factors Associated with Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 22;9(3):300.
• Schwarzinger M, et el., (2021 )Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics. Lancet Public Heal. 2021 Apr;6(4):210–21. 18.
• Strizova Z, Smetanova J, Bartunkova J, Milota T. Principles and challenges in anti-Covid-19 vaccine development. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(4):339-49
• Şimşek, E. (2020). Ankara ilindeki aile hekimliği kliniklerinde çalışan doktorların aşı karşıtlığı konusundaki görüş, tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. Uzmanlık Tezi, Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ankara.
• Şimşek, P., Günaydın, M. ve Gündüz, A. (2019). Hastane Öncesi Acil Sağlık Hizmetleri: Türkiye Örneği. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 120-127.
• Yiğit, T., Oktay, B. Ö., Özdemir, C. N., & Moustafa Paşa, S. (2020). Aşı karşıtlığı ve fikri gelişimi. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research.