Assessing forest governance in Albania

Abstract

In the last 20 years, Albania has transferred the ownership and the responsibility of the management of 80% of forest area from central government to local government. The process was part of a wide decentralization reform aiming to tackle the challenges related to illegal logging activities, weak institutions, and capacities, unclear laws and regulations, frequent reforms in forest administration, high sector informality etc. Due to decentralization forest governance involve two levels of government and a range of stakeholders with different interests (local communities, forest owners, private sector, etc.). Although the reforms are under implementation, there is a lack of assessments, to analyze the governance challenges for the sector. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide an assessment of the status of forest governance in Albania, using a comprehensive analytical framework developed by FAO and PROFOR. The framework is based on three columns (i) policy, legal, institutional and regulatory frameworks, (ii) planning and decision-making processes and (iii) implementation enforcement and compliance. A set of 84 indicators, considered to be relevant for Albania, has been chosen out of 130 indicators proposed by PROFOR. The assessment is carried out through a survey, with a cross-section of 30 experts from various forest-related institutions (state and non-state). The results show that forest governance in Albania is far from good forest governance, despite some positive efforts. The reasons for this are no clear set of policy directions, conflicting or confusing laws, complex forest law and bylaws, no secure access to forest resources by local communities, low capacities of government (central and local) and non-government stakeholders, lack of transparency and accountability etc.  

Keywords

• decentralization reforms,forest governance,stakeholders,analytical framework

References

1. Avdibegović M, Shannon M, Bećirović D, Mutabdžija S, Marić B, Malovrh ŠP (2014) Assessing forest governance in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Views of forestry professionals. In: Forests under pressure: Local responses to global issues. IUFRO World Series Volume 32: 369 – 380
2. Bonkoungou E.G. (2013) Analyse du cadre de la gouvernance forestière en République Démocratique du Congo dans le contexte de la REDD+ : Diagnostic de base et propositions d’intervention
3. Brito B, Micol L, Davis C, Nakhooda S, Daviet F and Thuault A (2009) The Governance of forests toolkit, Version 1: A draft framework of Indicators for Assessing Governance of the Forest Sector, World Resource Institute, Washington DC.
4. Cowling P, DeValue K and Rosenbaum K (2014) Assessing forest governance: A Practical Guide to Data Collection, Analysis, and Use. PROFOR and FAO. Washington DC.
5. FAO (2001) Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: A Compendium. Working Paper FM/5. Forest Resources Development Service, Forestry Department, FAO, Rome.
6. FAO (2012) Strengthening Effective Forest Governance Monitoring Practice, by A.J.van Bodegom, S.Wigboldus, A.G.Blundell, E.Harwell and H.Savenije. Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper No. 29. Rome.
7. FAO and PROFOR (2011) Framework for Assessing and Monitoring Forest Governance.
8. FDA (2012) Liberia: Assessment of key governance issues for REDD+ implementation through application of the PROFOR forest governance tool

9. Giessen L, Buttound G (2014) Defining and assessing forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, Volume (49): 1-3
10. Kishor N and Rosenbaum K (2012) Assessing and Monitoring Forest Governance: A user’s guide to a diagnostic tool. Washington DC: Program on Forests (PROFOR).
11. Maidell M, Cheney E, Rametsteiner E, (2012) A common framework to assess and monitor forest governance.
12. Mayers J, Bass S, Macqueen D (2002) The pyramid: A diagnostic and planning tool for good forest governance.
13. Mayers J, Bila A, Khaukha S, Opoku K and Simwela W (2006) Forest governance and social justice: practical tactics from a learning group approach in Africa. International Forestry Review Vol.8 (2): 201 – 210.
14. Muller E and Tuomasjukka (2010) Governance as a element of Global Political Agendas.
15. Raonintsoa P, Rakotoarisoa JN, Gräbener J (2012) Etat des lieux de la gouvernance forestière à Madagascar. Rapport de l’atelier du 18 et 19 octobre 2012.
16. The World Bank, (2009) Roots for Good Forest Outcomes: An Analytical Framework for Governance Reforms.
17. World Bank (2006) Improving Forest Governance, Chapter 5.