An Investigation of Intelligent and Conventional Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Uniform Atmospheric Conditions
Abstract
In recent years, power generation from photovoltaic (PV) system has received great attention compared to other renewable sources. Due to nonlinear characteristics of PV cells, the maximum allowable power level from PV panel changes with atmospheric parameters which are solar irradiance and temperature. In this context, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms are essential to maximize the output power of PV panel for any solar irradiance and temperature values. In the literature, various MPPT techniques have been studied to deliver maximum power from PV systems. Hence, this study discusses intelligent control techniques, which are called fuzzy logic controller (FLC) and neural network controller (NNC), and compares efficiency performance and convergence speed to conventional perturb & observe (P&O) and incremental conductance (Inc. Cond.) tracking techniques for MPPT of PV system.
In this paper, 150W PV panel model is investigated for different atmospheric conditions in MATLAB. Results of simulation show that NNC based and FLC based MPPTs have 4.66% better tracking accuracy than conventional P&O and Inc. Cond. under standard test condition (STC). NNC based MPPT has best iteration response rate among the other MPPTs under uniform atmospheric conditions. Therefore, the NNC based MPPT presents best superior quality in terms of efficiency and convergence speed for PV systems among the other MPPTs.
Keywords
References
- [1]. J. Ahmed and Z. Salam, “A Modified P&O Maximum Power Point Tracking Method With Reduced Steady-State Oscillation and Improved Tracking Efficiency,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1506–1515, Oct. 2016.
- [2]. A. B. . Bahgat, N. . Helwa, G. . Ahamd, and E. . El Shenawy, “Estimation of the maximum power and normal operating power of a photovoltaic module by neural networks,” 2004.
- [3]. J.-K. Shiau, Y.-C. Wei, and B.-C. Chen, “A Study on the Fuzzy-Logic-Based Solar Power MPPT Algorithms Using Different Fuzzy Input Variables,” Algorithms, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 100–127, Apr. 2015.
- [4]. P. Takun, S. Kaitwanidvilai, and C. Jettanasen, “Maximum Power Point Tracking using Fuzzy Logic Control for Photovoltaic Systems,” in Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 2011.
- [5]. A. Gupta, Y. K. Chauhan, and R. K. Pachauri, “A comparative investigation of maximum power point tracking methods for solar PV system,” Sol. Energy, vol. 136, pp. 236–253, 2016.
- [6]. E. Kandemir, N. S. Cetin, and S. Borekci, “A comprehensive overview of maximum power extraction methods for PV systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 78, pp. 93–112, 2017.
- [7]. S. Saravanan and N. Ramesh Babu, “Maximum power point tracking algorithms for photovoltaic system – A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 57, pp. 192–204, 2016.
- [8]. M. A. G. de Brito, L. Galotto, L. P. Sampaio, G. de A. e Melo, and C. A. Canesin, “Evaluation of the Main MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaic Applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1156–1167, Mar. 2013.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Review
Authors
Ekrem Kandemır
*
TUBITAK National Observatory, Research & Development Department, 07058, Antalya
Türkiye
Numan Sabit Cetin
Ege University, Solar Energy Institute, Izmir
Türkiye
Selim Borekci
Akdeniz University, Electrical Electronics Engineering Department, Antalya, Turkey
Türkiye
Publication Date
October 10, 2019
Submission Date
December 25, 2017
Acceptance Date
February 8, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 3 Number: 2