Evaluation of Various Risk Factors Caused by Mechanized Equipment Used in Forest Operations

Year 2022, , 40 - 45, 30.06.2022

İnanç Taş , Abdullah Emin Akay

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1131463

Abstract

Forestry is among the dangerous work classes due to its working conditions. Especially fatal accidents that may occur during forest operations take an important place in this regard. In addition to occupational accidents, there are various risks such as physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic. These risks are often ignored and can cause serious health problems in long periods. Considering the previous studies on this subject, the main risk factors can be classified as noise, particulate matter and gas. The noise caused by motor movements and particulate matter exposure caused by wood raw material or machine-ground interaction are important conditions. The release of waste gases to the environment during operations are often encountered. The main gases polluting the air include carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides, hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides. CO is very dangerous because of its rapid mixing with the blood. In this study, a synthesis of previous studies in machine-based risk factors during forest operations was provided and Fine Kinney Method, as one of the most common risk assessment methods used in the subject, were presented. This review paper providing a synthesis of previous studies in machine-based risk factors pointed out the working conditions of forest workers, importance of personal protective equipment and how to use risk assessment methods in the purpose of occupational health and safety.

Keywords

noise, Particulate matter, CO, forest operations, risk assessment, occupational health and safety

References

• Aksüt, G., Eren, T., Tüfekçi, M. 2020. Classification of ergonomic risk factors: a literature review. Ergonomic, 3(3): 169-192.
• Aytaç, Z., İlkılıç, C. 2019. The Investigation of Decrease Harmful Exhaust Emissions on a Diesel Engines. In 4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences. 22-24 November, Samsun, Türkiye.
• Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., Janssen, S., Stansfeld, S. 2014. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The lancet, 383(9925): 1325-1332.
• Güler, Ç., Çobanoğlu, Z. 1994. Noise. Environmental Health Core Resource Series, 19.
• Güvercin, Ö., Aybek, A. 2003. Noise Problem in Stone Pulverizing and Sieving Plants. KSU J. Science and Engineering. 6(2): 101-107.
• Hooper, B., Parker, R., Todoroki, C. 2017. Exploring chainsaw operator occupational exposure to carbon monoxide in forestry. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 14(1): D1-D12.
• Kinney, G. F., Wiruth, A. D. 1976. Practical risk analysis for safety management. Naval Weapons Center China Lake CA. 21 p.
• Kök, F. 2020. Preventing the Damage to Human Health by The Gases Released in The Fire. National Environmental Science Research Journal, 3(2): 83-94.
• Laden, F., Schwartz, J., Speizer, F.E., Dockery, D.W. 2006. Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 173(6): 667-672.
• Medina, S., Plasencia, A., Ballester, F., Mücke, H. G., Schwartz, J. 2004. Apheis: public health impact of PM10 in 19 European cities. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(10): 831-836.
• Osada, Y. 1988. An overview of health effects on noise. Journal of sound and vibration, 127(3): 407-410.
• Pope III, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thurston, G. D., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., Godleski, J. J. 2004. Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease. Circulation, 109(1): 71-77.
• Pönkä, A., Savela, M., Virtanen, M. 1998. Mortality and air pollution in Helsinki. Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal, 53(4): 281-286.
• Raub, J. A., Mathieu-Nolf, M., Hampson, N. B., Thom, S. R. 2000. Carbon monoxide poisoning—a public health perspective. Toxicology, 145(1): 1-14.
• Official newspaper 2013. Regulation on Protection of Employees from Risks Related to Noise. T. C. Official newspaper, 28721, 28 July, 2013.
• Serin, H., Akay, A. E. 2018. Analysis of Noise Level During Logging. 14. National Ergonomics Congress, 30 October-1 November, Trabzon, Türkiye.
• Taş, İ., Akay, A.E. 2019. Analysis of Dust Exposure during Chainsaw Felling Operations. V. Science Technology and Innovation Congress, 17-21 April, Alanya, Antalya.
• Toprak, R., Aktürk, N. 2004. The negative effects of noise on human health. Turkish Journal of Hygiene and Experimental Biology. 61(1), 49-58.
• Tunay, M., Melemez, K. 2008. Noise induced hearing loss of forest workers in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11(17): 2144-2148.
• Url-1 https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/documents/codetables /aqi_breakpoints.html Last Access: 10/06/2022
• Watts, G. R. 1995. A comparison of noise measures for assessing vehicle noisiness. Journal of sound and vibration, 180(3): 493-512.
• World Health Organization. 2002. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization. 248 p.
• Zencirci, S.A., Işıklı, B. 2017. Air Pollution. Journal of Public Health of the Turkish World. Application and Research Center. 2(2): 24-36.