Computer-Assisted Ergonomic Analysis of Working Postures Causing Strain

Year 2022, , 66 - 76, 30.12.2022

Tuna Emir , Tugrul Varol , Halil Barış Özel

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1188547

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the postures of workers in a workshop type small-scale furniture manufacturing factory considering seven workstations including edge banding station, horizontal circular saw cutting station, circular saw cutting station, borehole station, planning station, thickness adjustment (planning station, and band saw station. It was also intended to determine the points they have difficulty and what extent they have difficulty (i.e. the level of risk), and to bring the workplace conditions in compliance with the workers’ necessities through improvement arrangements about how they can avoid the ergonomic risks and dangers they face. Video recordings and photographs of each process were taken from different angles with cameras. Posture analysis was performed by selecting the movement that is most repetitive, longest, improper and forceful posture. Contrary to the previous studies incorporating estimation-based risk analyses, the present study employs uMED Ergonomics software, which allows analysis by collecting data (i.e. distance and angle) with measurement tools on the image, in analyzing the angles of body parts and clearly revealing the workers’ postures. Ergonomic risk analysis was performed using the REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method, as it numerically quantifies the degree of risk which is one of the effective risk assessment methods. It was determined that the posture modifications and some ergonomic improvements significantly reduced the risk level. Accordingly, once the risk levels were determined (high for Station 1, medium for other stations), the risks were reduced to very low for Stations 4 and 7, and low for other stations.

Keywords

Working postures, ergonomic risk analysis, uMED ergonomics, furniture factory, REBA

References

• Akın, G., Koca, B. 2002. Ergonomide antropometrinin önemi, Standart Dergisi, 490: 43-46.
• Akın, G., Koca, B. 2004. Ergonomik tasarım ve tasarımda ergonomik kriterler, Standart Dergisi, 510: 79-83.
• Andersen, J.H., Haahr, Jens P., Frost, P. 2007. Risk factors for more severe regional musculoskeletal symptoms a two-year prospective study of a general working population, Arthritis Rheum, 56(4):1355-64.
• Andersen J.H., Kaergaard, A., Frost, P., Thomsen, J.F., Bonde, J.P., Fallentin, N. 2002. Physical, psychosocial, and ındividual risk factors for neck/shoulder pain with pressure tenderness in the muscles among workers performing monotonous, Repetitive Work, Spine, 27(6): 660-667.
• Asensio-Cuesta, S., Diego-Mas, J. A., Canós-Darós, L., Andrés-Romano, C. 2012. A genetic algorithm for the design of job rotation schedules considering ergonomic and competence criteria. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60(9): 1161-1174.
• Atasoy, A., Keskin, F., Başkesen, N. Tekingündüz, S. 2010. Laboratuvar çalışanlarında işe bağlı kas iskelet sistemi sorunları ve ergonomik risklerin değerlendirilmesi, Sağlıkta Performans ve Kalite Dergisi, 2, 1309-1972.
• Atasoy Mert, E. 2014. Ergonomik risk değerlendirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması ve bir çanta imalat atölyesinde uygulanması, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Uzmanlık Tezi, ÇSGB İSGGM, 199 s.
• Aygün, İ., Çakmak, B. Alayunt, F.N. 2018. Narenciye hasadının ergonomik açıdan incelenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6:312-318.
• Baş, H., Yapıcı, F. 2020. İş istasyonlarında çalışanlarda zorlanmaya neden olan duruşların ergonomik açıdan irdelenmesi: Örnek uygulama, Ergonomics, 3(3):128-137.
• Cabeças, J.M. 2006. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders in europe: Impact, risk factors and preventive regulations. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies; 2(2): 95-104.
• Cohen, A.L., Gjessing, C.C., Fine, L.J., Bernard, B.P., McGlothlin, J.D. 1997. Elements of Ergonomics (A Primer Based on Workplace Evaluations of Musculoskeletal Disor-ders), DHHS (NIOSH) Publication, USA. 26 s.
• Çiçek, E., Kazanç, N., Kahya, E. 2018. Bir mobilya işletmesinin montaj hattında ergonomik risk analizi, Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, ÖS: Ergonomi, 6: 67–82.
• Çiçek, H., Çağdaş, A. 2020. Ergonomik Faktörlerin Çalışan Performansına Olan Etkileri, OHS Academy, 3(2): 135-143.
• Dizdar, E.N., Türkan, N., Kurt M. 1998. Dinamik çalışma şartlarına adaptasyon için bir ergonomik otomasyon modeli. 6. Ergonomi Kongresi, Tübitak, Ankara, 315-322.
• Dsingh, A., Kaur, J. 2019. Ergonomic risk factors in women workers ınvolved in handicraft industry of patiala district. Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, 380-385.
• Enez, K., Nalbantoğlu, S. 2015. Reba yönteminin ormancılık faaliyetleri açısından değerlendirilmesi, Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, p. 137.
• Engür, M.O., Chaush-Ogly, K. 2019. Türkiye’de iş sağlığı ve güvenliği mevzuatında ergonominin yeri üzerine bir çalışma, Ergonomics, 2(2): 69-77.
• Felekoğlu, B., Özmehmet Taşan, S. 2017. İş ile ilgili kas iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarına yönelik ergonomik risk değerlendirme: reaktif/proaktif bütünleşik bir sistematik yaklaşım, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 32(3):777-793.
• Helander, M.G. 1991. Safety hazards and motivation for safe work in the construction industry, Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 8:205-223.
• Hignett, S., McAtamney. L. 2000. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics, 31(2): 201-205.
• Hignett, S., McAtamney. L. 1998. Technical note rapid entire body assessment (REBA), Ergonomist, Nottingham City.
• Ikonne, C.N. 2014. Influence of workstation and work posture ergonomics on job satisfaction of librarians in the federal and state university libraries in Southern Nigeria, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(9): 78-84.
• Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2000. Research on work-related low back disorders. 1st ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, p. 5
• İçağasıoğlu, A., Yumuşakhuylu, Y., Ketenci, A., Toraman, N.F., Maymak Karataş, G., Kuru, Ö., Kirazlı, Y., Çapacı, K., Eriman, E., Haliloğlu, S. 2015. Burden of chronic low back pain in the turkish population, Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61: 58-64.
• Koç, S., Testik, Ö.M. 2016. Mobilya sektöründe yaşanan kas-iskelet sistemi risklerinin farklı değerlendirme metotları ile incelenmesi ve minimizasyonu, Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 27(2):2-27.
• Koçak, G. 2007. Gemi Makineleri İşletmesinde Ergonomik Analiz, İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 122 s.
• Li, G., Buckle, P. 1999. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks with emphasis on posture based methods, Ergonomics, 42(5):674- 695.
• Meenaxi, T., Sudha, B. 2012. Causes of musculoskeletal disorder in textile industry, International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 1(4):48-50.
• Pandey, K., Aditi, V. 2013. Ergonomic hazard ıdentification of workers engaged in brick making factories, Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 5(2):297-301.
• Parsons, K.C. 2000. Environmental, ergonomics; A review of principles, method and models, Applied Ergonomics, 31: 581-594.
• Parent-Thirion, A., Fernández Macías, E., Hurley, J., Vermeylen, G. 2007. Fourth European Working Conditions Survey, ISBN 92-897-0974-X, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.
• Sağıroğlu, H., Coşkun, M.B. Erginel, N. 2015. REBA ile bir üretim hattındaki iş istasyonlarının ergonomik risk analizi, Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 3(3):339-345.
• Sever, S., Deste, M. (2021). Üretim süreçlerinde ergonomik riskler ve risk değerlendirme yöntemleri: Cıva fabrikasında bir uygulama, European Journal of Science and Technology, 25:417-441.
• Tissot, F., Messing, K., Stock, S. 2009. Studying the relationship between low back pain and working postures among those who stand and those who sit most of the working day, Ergonomics, 52(11):1402-18.
• Tol, G. 2019. Ergonomik Risk Değerlendirme Analizlerinin Yapılması ve Tersane Sektörüne Uygulanması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, s. 76.
• Ünver-Okan, S., Kaya, A. (2015). Orman fidanlıklarında fidan repikaj işlerinde çalışma duruşlarının Reba yöntemi ile analizi, Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 3(3):157-163.