Research Article

Computer-Assisted Ergonomic Analysis of Working Postures Causing Strain

Volume: 8 Number: 2 December 30, 2022
EN

Computer-Assisted Ergonomic Analysis of Working Postures Causing Strain

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the postures of workers in a workshop type small-scale furniture manufacturing factory considering seven workstations including edge banding station, horizontal circular saw cutting station, circular saw cutting station, borehole station, planning station, thickness adjustment (planning station, and band saw station. It was also intended to determine the points they have difficulty and what extent they have difficulty (i.e. the level of risk), and to bring the workplace conditions in compliance with the workers’ necessities through improvement arrangements about how they can avoid the ergonomic risks and dangers they face. Video recordings and photographs of each process were taken from different angles with cameras. Posture analysis was performed by selecting the movement that is most repetitive, longest, improper and forceful posture. Contrary to the previous studies incorporating estimation-based risk analyses, the present study employs uMED Ergonomics software, which allows analysis by collecting data (i.e. distance and angle) with measurement tools on the image, in analyzing the angles of body parts and clearly revealing the workers’ postures. Ergonomic risk analysis was performed using the REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method, as it numerically quantifies the degree of risk which is one of the effective risk assessment methods. It was determined that the posture modifications and some ergonomic improvements significantly reduced the risk level. Accordingly, once the risk levels were determined (high for Station 1, medium for other stations), the risks were reduced to very low for Stations 4 and 7, and low for other stations.

Keywords

Working postures , ergonomic risk analysis , uMED ergonomics , furniture factory , REBA

References

  1. Akın, G., Koca, B. 2002. Ergonomide antropometrinin önemi, Standart Dergisi, 490: 43-46.
  2. Akın, G., Koca, B. 2004. Ergonomik tasarım ve tasarımda ergonomik kriterler, Standart Dergisi, 510: 79-83.
  3. Andersen, J.H., Haahr, Jens P., Frost, P. 2007. Risk factors for more severe regional musculoskeletal symptoms a two-year prospective study of a general working population, Arthritis Rheum, 56(4):1355-64.
  4. Andersen J.H., Kaergaard, A., Frost, P., Thomsen, J.F., Bonde, J.P., Fallentin, N. 2002. Physical, psychosocial, and ındividual risk factors for neck/shoulder pain with pressure tenderness in the muscles among workers performing monotonous, Repetitive Work, Spine, 27(6): 660-667.
  5. Asensio-Cuesta, S., Diego-Mas, J. A., Canós-Darós, L., Andrés-Romano, C. 2012. A genetic algorithm for the design of job rotation schedules considering ergonomic and competence criteria. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60(9): 1161-1174.
  6. Atasoy, A., Keskin, F., Başkesen, N. Tekingündüz, S. 2010. Laboratuvar çalışanlarında işe bağlı kas iskelet sistemi sorunları ve ergonomik risklerin değerlendirilmesi, Sağlıkta Performans ve Kalite Dergisi, 2, 1309-1972.
  7. Atasoy Mert, E. 2014. Ergonomik risk değerlendirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması ve bir çanta imalat atölyesinde uygulanması, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Uzmanlık Tezi, ÇSGB İSGGM, 199 s.
  8. Aygün, İ., Çakmak, B. Alayunt, F.N. 2018. Narenciye hasadının ergonomik açıdan incelenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6:312-318.
  9. Baş, H., Yapıcı, F. 2020. İş istasyonlarında çalışanlarda zorlanmaya neden olan duruşların ergonomik açıdan irdelenmesi: Örnek uygulama, Ergonomics, 3(3):128-137.
  10. Cabeças, J.M. 2006. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders in europe: Impact, risk factors and preventive regulations. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies; 2(2): 95-104.
APA
Emir, T., Varol, T., & Özel, H. B. (2022). Computer-Assisted Ergonomic Analysis of Working Postures Causing Strain. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 8(2), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1188547