Forestry Insights of Some Asian and European Countries: National Forest Harvesting Strategies and New Approaches

Year 2023, , 88 - 100, 26.12.2023

Majid Lotfalian , Jorn Erler , Tibor Pentek , Abdullah Emin Akay , Rodolfo Pichio , Tomislav Poršinsky

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1335766

Abstract

As forestry approaches have been formed according to the demands and aspirations of the society, the forest sector implies different concerns such as social, economic, and environmental. Harvesting and extraction of wood at low cost, protection of stands against degradation and changes in land use, proper implementation of afforestation and forest extension, conservation of endemic species, preservation of soil, providing jobs, and supporting national and domestic development have a different priority for foresters, depending on the time and area conditions. Of course, all of these have always been discussed by the shareholders in the forest sector with the main attention to forest sustainability. However, the question is: Are forestry approaches compatible with the changes in the world today? With increasing environmental concerns, as discussed at the Glasgow 2021 Conference, the importance of forests and their protection has doubled, and it seems that forestry practices in the world need a new approach. In addition to climate change, increasing human population and regional and global economic changes affect the use of forests and the form of forest management and utilization. This paper aims to take an analytical look at this issue and examine the current situation in five countries (Iran, Germany, Croatia, Turkiye and Italy). It was also targeted with the help of the DPSIR Framework to elaborate on the social consequences of the situation, and an analysis was presented about what to do or not. This paper emphasizes that forest managers and policymakers need to modify and adapt the plans and methods in a way that is appropriate to the progress of time and its changes, while protecting forests and ensuring their sustainability, limiting non-professionals from involving directly in the decision-making process.

Keywords

Conservation, Climate change, DPSIR, Forest Operations, Sustainable Forest Management, Forest Policy

References

• Aggarwal, S., Larson, A., McDermott, C., Katila, P., Giessen, L., 2020. Tenure reform for better forestry: An unfinished policy agenda. Forest Policy and Economics 123:102376 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forpol.2020.102376.
• Akay, A.E., Serin, H., Sessions, J., Bilici, E., Pak, M., 2021. Evaluating the Effects of Improving Forest Road Standards on Economic Value of Forest Products. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 42(2):245-258. https://doi:10.5552/crojfe.2021.851.
• Albizu-Urionabarrenetxea, P., Tolosana-Esteban, E., Roman-Jordan, E., 2013. Safety and health in forest harvesting operations. Diagnosis and preventive actions. A review. Forest Systems 22(3):392-400. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-02714.
• Arbogast, C.J., 1957. Marking guides for northern hardwoods under the selection system. 21. Station Paper LS-56. St. Paul, MN: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Lake States Forest Experiment Station
• Bilici, E., Akay, A.E., 2021. Forestry and Forest Operations in Turkey: Challenges and Developments. Revista Pădurilor 136(1):37-52.
• Binkley, D., Giardina, C., 1998. Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry 42:89-106. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005948126251.
• Buğday, E., Menemencioğlu, K., 2014. Assessment of Existing Forest Road Standards Conformity for Stumpage Sale in Turkey. II. National Mediterranean Forest and Environment Symposium. 22-24 October. Isparta, Turkey.
• Buongiorno, J., Gilless, J.K., 2003. Decision Methods for Forest Resource Management. Academic Press, San Diego 439p.
• Champagne, E., Raymond, P., Royo, A.A., Speed, J.D.M., Tremblay, J.P., Côté, S.D., 2021. A Review of Ungulate Impacts on the Success of Climate-Adapted Forest Management Strategies. Current Forestry Reports 7:305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40725-021-00148-5.
• De Liocourt, F., 1901. Sapinières. Manuscript held in the Library of the Ecole Nationale du Génie Rural, des Eaux et des Forêts Nancy, France 42-82
• DP., 2020. Forestry and Forest Products. The Eleventh Development Plan (2019-2023). Ministry of Development, Ankara 2020:87p.
• Đuka, A., Grigolato, S., Papa, I., Pentek, T., Poršinsky, T., 2017. Assessment of timber extraction distance and skid road network in steep karst terrain. iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry 10:886–894.
• Đuka, A., Sertić, M., Pentek, T., Papa, I., Janeš, D., Poršinsky, T., 2020. Round Wood Waste and Losses – Is Rationalisation in Scaling Possible? Croatian Journal of forest engineering 41(2):287–298.
• Eker, M., Sessions, J., 2020. Refocusing on Operational Harvest Planning Model for State-Owned Forestry in Turkey. European Journal of Forest Engineering 6(2):96-106. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.829946.
• Erler, J., 2017. Transfer system to adapt timber harvesting operations to local conditions. Croatian Journal of forest engineering 38(2):197-208.
• Erler, J., 2018. Educational leaflets in Institute of Forest Utilization and Forest Technology. 2018 (Unpublished).
• Erler, J., 2017. Transfer system to adapt timber harvesting operations to local conditions. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 38(2):197-208.
• FAO., 2021. Sustainable forest management. 2021 Available from: https://www.fao.org/forestry/sfm/en/ Accessed 9 Jan 2022.
• Forest Europe., 2021. SFM Criteria & Indicators 2021 Available from: https://foresteurope.org/sfm-criteria-indicators/. Accessed 9 Jan 2022.
• FS., 2020. Forestry Statistics. Official Statistics, General Directorate of Forestry. Ankara.
• GDF., 2021. Performance Program of 2021. Strategy Development Department, General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara, Turkey, 55p.
• Genç, Ç., Arıcak, B., 2016. Determination of Routes as Type-A Forest Roads for Long Haulage Vehicles: Küre Forest Sub-District Directorate. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 16(2):474-484. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.289757.
• Golec, P.J., Luckert, M.K., 2008. Would harmonizing public land forest policies, Criteria and Indicators, and certification improve progress towards Sustainable Forest Management? A case study in Alberta, Canada.
• Forestry Chronicle 3:410-419. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc84410-3.
• Graves, H.S., 1937. Cooperative Effort in Forestry. Journal of Forestry 35(7):639-644. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jof/35.7.639.
• Hosseini, S.M., Majnounian, B., Namiranian, M., 2002. Investigation of logging damage on two mechanized skidding system on the trunk of remaining trees in north of Iran. Journal of Iranian Forest Resources 54(1):23-29. (In Persian).
• Husch, B., 1987. Guidelines for forest policy formulation, FAO forestry paper. 81 Rome. 91p.
• Jordan-Lopez, A., Martinez-Zavala, L., Bellinfante, N., 2009. Impact of different parts of unpaved forest roads on runoff and sediment yield in a Mediterranean area. Science of the Total Environment 407:937-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.scitotenv.2008.09.047.
• Kim, Y.S., Rodrigues, M., Robinne, F.N., 2021. Economic drivers of global fire activity: A critical review using the DPSIR framework. Forest Policy and Economics 131:102563. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.forpol.2021.102563.
• Krott, M., 2008. Forest government and forest governance within a Europe in change. The Multifunctional Role of Forests Policies, Methods and Case Studies. 13:EFI Proceedings No. 55.
• Larson, A.M., Mausch, K., Bourne, M., Luttrell, C., Schoneveld, G., Cronkleton, P., et al., 2021. Hot topics in governance for forests and trees: Towards a (just) transformative research agenda. Forest Policy and Economics 131:102567. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.forpol.2021.102567.
• Latterini, F., Mederski, P.S., Jaeger, D., Venanzi, R., Tavankar, F., Picchio, R., 2023. The Influence of Various Silvicultural Treatments and Forest Operations on Tree Species Biodiversity. Current Forestry Reports 9(2):59-71.
• Levers, C., Verkerk, P.J., Müller, D., Verburg, P.H., Butsic, V., Leitão, P.J., et al., 2014. Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 315:160-172. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.030.
• Liu, S., Xia, J., 2021. Forest harvesting restriction and forest restoration in China. Forest Policy and Economics 129:102516. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.forpol.2021.102516.
• Lotfalian, M., Majnounian, B., Rezvanfar, M., Parsakhoo, A., 2009. Investigation of damages due to forest logging under selection cutting system on stand and regeneration. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 46(12a):363-376.
• Lotfalian, M., Parsakhoo, A., 2009. Investigation of forest soil disturbance caused by rubber-tired skidder traffic. International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences 3(1):79-82. http://www. ijnes.org/index.php/ijnes/article/view/446.
• Lotfalian, M., 2013. Forest logging, Aiizh Press, 467p. ISBN 978-964-970-319-0. Tehran.
• Lotfalian, M., 2012. Wood transportation, Aiizh Press, 342p. ISBN 978-964-970-303-9. Tehran.
• Marchi, E., Chung, W., Visser, R., Abbas, D., Nordfjell, T., Mederski, P.S., McEwan, A., et al. 2018. Sustainable Forest Operations (SFO): A new paradigm in a changing world and climate. Science of the Total Environment 634:1385-1397.
• Maxim, L., Spangenberg, J., O’Connor, M., 2009. The DPSIR framework for Biodiversity Assessment. Ecological Economics 69(1):12-23. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.017.
• Mrosek, T., Balsillie, D., Schleifenbaum, P., 2006. Field testing of a criteria and indicators system for sustainable forest management at the local level. Case study results concerning the sustainability of the private forest Haliburton Forest and Wild Life Reserve in Ontario, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 8(6):593-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.forpol.2004.11.002.
• Murphy, G., 2004. Long-Term impacts of forest harvesting related soil disturbance on log product yields and economic potential in a New Zealand forest. Silva Fennica 38(3):279-289. https://doi.org/ 10.14214/sf.416.
• Naghdi, R., Lotfalian, M., Bagheri, I., Jalali, A.M., 2009. Damages of Skidder and Animal Logging to Forest Soils and Natural Regeneration. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 30(2):141-149.
• Nakagawa, M., Kurahashi, A., 2005. Factors affecting soil-based natural regeneration of Abies sachalinensis following timber harvesting in a sub-boreal forest. New Forests 9(2):199-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11056-005-0273-5.
• Pandur, Z., Poršinsky, T., Šušnjar, M., Zorić, M., Vusić, D., 2014. Soil Disturbance during Timber Forwarding in Cut-Blocks of Common Oak. Nova Mehanizacija Šumarstva 35:23–34.
• Pentek, T., Đuka, A., Papa, I., Damić, D., Poršinsky, T., 2016. The Effectiveness Study of Primary Forest Road Traffic Infrastructure – an Alternative to Study of Primary Forest Opening or Just a Short-term Solution? Šumarski List 140(9–10):435–453.
• Pentek, T., Poršinsky, T., Đuka, A., Tomašić, Ž., 2016. Planning of primary forest road network on strategic and tactical level – from idea to implementation in operational forestry. Proceedings of 49th Symposium on Forest Mechanization – FORMEC, Warsaw, September 4–7, 322.
• Picchio, R., Latterini, F., Mederski, P.S., Tocci, D., Venanzi, R., Stefanoni, W., Pari, L., 2020. Applications of GIS-Based Software to Improve the Sustainability of a Forwarding Operation in Central Italy. Sustainability 12(14)5716. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su12145716.
• Picchio, R., Mederski, P.S., Tavankar, F., 2020. How and How Much, Do Harvesting Activities Affect Forest Soil, Regeneration and Stands?. Current Forestry Reports 6,115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-020-00113-8.
• Poršinsky, T., Đuka, A., Papa, I., Bumber, Z., Janeš, D., Tomašić, Ž., Pentek, T., 2017. Criteria for Determining Primary Forest Traffic Infrastructure Network Density – Examples of The Most Common Cases. Šumarski List 141(11–12):593–608.
• Poršinsky, T., Matas, J., Horvat, D., Đuka, A., 2020. Pneumatici kotača šumskih vozila (Tyres of Forestry Vehicles). Šumarski List 144 (9–10):509–522.
• Poršinsky, T., Pentek, T., Bosner, A., Stankić, I., 2012. Ecoefficient Timber Forwarding on Lowland Soft Soils. In: Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management (ed: C. A. Okia), In Tech, 275–288.
• Poršinsky, T., Stankić, I., Bosner, A., 2011. Ecoefficient Timber Forwarding Based on Nominal Ground Pressure Analysis. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 31(1):345–356.
• Poršinsky, T., Zec, S., 2015. Croatian Chamber of Forestry and Wood Technology Engineers Issued Their First Professional Guidelines. Nova Mehanizacija Šumarstva 36:91–102.
• Pukkala, T., 2022. Assessing the externalities of timber production. Forest Policy and Economics 135:102646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021. 102646.
• Rab, M.A., 2003. Recovery of Soil Physical Properties from Compaction and Soil Profile Disturbance Caused by Logging of Native Forest in Victorian Central Highlands, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 191:329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.foreco.2003.12.010.
• Rodriguez-Labajos, B., Binimelis, R., Monterroso, I., 2009. Multi-level driving forces of biological invasions. Ecological Economics 69:63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.022.
• Şafak, İ., Eker, M., Erdem, M., Turan, İ., 2019. Time and motion analysis on cable skidding with agricultural tractors of coniferous logs. Turkish Journal of Forestry Research 6(1):58-47. https://doi.org/ 10.17568/ogmoad.451128.
• Schweier, J., Magagnotti, N., Labelle, E.R., Athanassiadis, D., 2019. Sustainability Impact Assessment of Forest Operations: a Review. Current Forestry Reports 5:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40725-019-00091-6.
• Serin, H., Akay, A.E., Pak, M., 2010. Estimating the Effects of Optimum Bucking on the Economic Value of Brutian Pine (Pinus Brutia) Logs Extracted in Mediterranean Region of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(9):916-921.
• Sohrabi, H., Jourgholami, M., Jafari, M., Shabanian, N., Venanzi, R., Tavankar, F., Picchio, R., 2020. Soil recovery assessment after timber harvesting based on the sustainable forest operation (SFO) perspective in Iranian temperate forests. Sustainability 12(7): 2874.
• Soler, R., Lorenzo, C., González, J., Carboni, L., Delgado, J., Díaz, M., et al., 2021. The politics behind scientific knowledge: Sustainable forest management in Latin America. Forest Policy and Economics 131:102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102543. S tańczykiewicz A, Szewczyk G, Kulak D., 2015. Damage to advance growth resulting from timber harvesting during final cuttings. Balt. For 21(1):144–51.
• Steve, D., Luc, L., 2010. Forest harvesting entrepreneurs, perception of their business status and its influence on performance evaluation. Forest Policy and Economics 12(4)287-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.forpol.2009.11.004
• Trautner, A., Arvidsson, J., 2003. Subsoil compaction caused by machinery traffic on a Swedish Eutric Cambisol at different soil water contents. Soil and Tillage Research 73:107-118. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00104-1.
• Tscherning, K., Helming, K., Krippner, B., Sieber, S., Paloma, S.G., 2012. Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making?. Land Use Policy 29(1):102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.landusepol.2011.05.009
• Ursić, B., Vusić, D., Papa, I., Poršinsky, T., Zečić, Ž., Đuka, A., 2022. Damage to Residual Trees in Thinning of Broadleaf Stand by Mechanised Harvesting System. Forests 13(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010051
• Venanzi, R., Latterini, F., Civitarese, V., Picchio, R., 2023. Recent Applications of Smart Technologies for Monitoring the Sustainability of Forest Operations. Forests 14(7):1503.
• Walters, C.J., 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. MacMillan, New York, NY.
• Weiss, G., Hansen, E., Ludvig, A., Nybakk, E., Toppinen, A., 2021. Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps. Forest Policy and Economics 130:102506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102506.
• Wildberg, J., Möhring, B., 2021. Continuous timber harvest — Costly restriction or profitable solution? Forest Policy and Economics 123:102349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102349.
• Williamson, J.R., Neilson, W.A., 2000. The influence of forest site on rate and extent of soil compaction and profile disturbance of skid trails during ground based harvesting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30(8):1196-1205. https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-041.
• Wood, M.J., Carling, P.A., Moffat, A.J., 2003. Reduced ground disturbance during mechanized forest harvesting on sensitive forest soils in the UK. Forestry 76(3):345-361. https://doi.org/10.1093 /forestry/76.3.345.
• Zhou, M., Liang, J., Buongiorno, J., 2008. Adaptive versus fixed policies for economic or ecological objectives in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 254(2):178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco. 2007.07.035.