Research Article

Productivity Analysis of Roadside Loading with a Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Crane Using a Regression Tree Model

Volume: 11 Number: 2 December 25, 2025
EN

Productivity Analysis of Roadside Loading with a Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Crane Using a Regression Tree Model

Abstract

Timber loading operations play a crucial role in the seamless execution of forest production activities. In this study, the productivity of the truck-mounted hydraulic crane, which used for loading timbers, was analyzed using the time study method. Additionally, the loader's productivity was statistically evaluated according to affecting factors. The study was conducted in the production activities carried out within the boundaries of the Kayadibi Forest Enterprise Chief of the Arhavi Forest Enterprise Directorate in Artvin province of Türkiye. According to the study results, the average productivity of loading operations with the truck-mounted hydraulic crane was found to be 34.28 m3/hour. It was determined that the most time-consuming phase in a loading cycle was placing the timbers and releasing the timbers onto the logging truck (32.86%), and the approaching time to the timber was the least time-consuming phase (11.39%). Additionally, the delay time was found to account for 24.76% of the total cycle time. According to the correlation test results, there was a strong, positive, and significant relationship (p < 0.001) at the 99% confidence level between productivity and both product diameter and volume. The regression tree model yielded an R² value of 0.7, with the volume variable contributing the most (99%) as an independent factor.

Keywords

Modified truck , mechanized loading , productivity , regression tree model , Türkiye

References

  1. Akay, A.E., Bilici, E., Taş. İ., Fındık, H.E. 2020. Productivity analysis of front-end loader in timber harvesting. Eur. J. Forest Eng. 6(1): 7-13.
  2. Akay, A.E. 2005. Using farm tractors in small-scale forest harvesting operations. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1(2): 196-199.
  3. Arcego, H., Robert, R.C.G., Brown, R.O. 2019. Effect of log length on forestry loading and unloading. Floresta e Ambiente 26(2): e20170269. DOI 10.1590/2179-8087.026917
  4. Bishara, A.J., Hittner, J.B. 2012. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches. Psychological Methods 17(3): 399.
  5. Carus, S. 2002. Comparison of some volume formulas regarding the stem. segments and fractions of the stem. Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Forestry Journa,l Seri A. (1): 101-114.
  6. Cawley, G.C., Talbot, N.L.C. 2010. On Over-fitting in Model Selection and Subsequent Selection Bias in Performance Evaluation. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 11: 2079-2107.
  7. Chen, A., Zhang, X., Zhou, Z. 2020. Machine learning: Accelerating materials development for energy storage and conversion. InfoMat, 2(3): 553-576.
  8. Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., Jurman, G. 2021. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e623.
  9. Chok, N.S. 2010. Pearson's versus Spearman's and Kendall's correlation coefficients for continuous data. MSc thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 43 p.
  10. Conway, S. 1982. Logging practices: principles of timber harvesting systems. Miller Freeman Publications, San Francisco. 432 pp.
APA
Türk, Y., Akay, A. E., & Çınar, T. (2025). Productivity Analysis of Roadside Loading with a Truck-Mounted Hydraulic Crane Using a Regression Tree Model. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 11(2), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1584795