Review

Risks Factors Associated with Post-Fire Salvage Logging Operations

Volume: 1 Number: 2 December 31, 2015
Ebru Bilici , Abdullah E. Akay
EN

Risks Factors Associated with Post-Fire Salvage Logging Operations

Abstract

Logging operations are generally listed in the most dangerous work groups since they require very heavy and difficult tasks. Besides, they are performed in varying, unpredictable, and uncontrolled work environment. In Turkey, traditional logging operations with limited usage of mechanized harvesting systems potentially increase occupational health and work safety problems. On the other hand, the logging operations can become even more dangerous during timber salvage activities after fire because regular work conditions dramatically change and work environment may carry different risks in fire-damaged stands. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with post-fire salvage logging operations considering occupational health and safety problems. By synthesizing previously conducted studies and works, potential risk factors in regular logging operations were presented and then additional risk factors related with salvage logging operations were discussed. Finally, some suggestions were provided to reduce risks associated with post-fire salvage logging operations.    

Keywords

Post-fire salvage logging, Loggers, Occupational risks, Health and safety problems, Forest fires

References

  1. Vieira, E. M. and Marinho-Filho, J., 1998. Pre-and Post-Fire Habitat Utilization by Rodents of Cerrado from Central Brazil. Biotropic, 30(3): 491–496.
  2. Syed, T., 2010. Health Effects of Workplace Chemicals Toluene, Benzene, Methyl ethyl peroxide, and Epichlorohydrim. Occupational and Environmental Health Coalition. Trent University, Oshawa, ON Canada 32 p.
  3. Stafoggia, M., Samoli, E., Alessandrini, E., Cadum, E., Ostro, B., Berti, G., ... and Randi, G., 2013. Short-term associations between fine and coarse particulate matter and hospitalizations in Southern Europe: results from the MED-PARTICLES project. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(9):1026-1033.
  4. Sivrikaya, F., Saglam, B., Akay, A.E., Bozali, N. 2014. Evaluation of forest fire risk with GIS. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 23(1): 187-194.
  5. Serin H., and Akay A.E., 2008. The analyses of noise level during tree bucking operation. XIV. National Congress of Ergonomics. 30 October-1 November. Trabzon, Turkey. pp: 412-416.
  6. Poschen, P. and Juntunen, M.L., 1998. Psychosocial Factors, Chapter 68: Forestry, Industries Based on Biological Resources, Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, J. M. Stellman (ed.), International Labor Office (ILO), 3(10): 21-23. Geneva.
  7. Poschen, P., 1998. General Profile, Chapter 68: Forestry, Industries Based on Biological Resources, Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, J. M. Stellman (ed.), International Labor Office (ILO), 3(10): 62-66. Geneva.
  8. Poschen, P., 1998. Skills and training, Chapter 68: Forestry, Industries Based on Biological Resources, Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, J. M. Stellman (ed.), International Labor Office (ILO), 3(10): 35-36. Geneva.
  9. Ponten, B., 1998. Physical Safety Hazards, Chapter 68: Forestry, Industries Based on Biological Resources, Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, J. M. Stellman (ed.), International Labor Office (ILO), 3(10): 19-20. Geneva.
  10. Piccolo, A., Plutino D., Cannistraro G., 2005. Evaluation and analysis of the environmental noise of Messina, Italy. Appl. Acoust. 66(4): 447- 465.
APA
Bilici, E., & Akay, A. E. (2015). Risks Factors Associated with Post-Fire Salvage Logging Operations. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 1(2), 93-100. https://izlik.org/JA99MP52US