Process Conditions of Table Olive Fermentation

Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 1 - 11, 30.06.2023

Osman Onur Kara

Abstract

Table olive is one of the important fermented products in the food industry. There are mainly two types of table olive production methods in which fermentation is used. These are natural fermentation methods and Spanish style methods. Fermentation process in these methods take time and during this time the process progresses under the influence of different factors and so it must be managed well in order to achieve the desired quality, standard and safety production and minimum economic losses. In table olive fermentation, phenolic compounds contents, reducing sugar content, microbial profile, salt concentration, acidity and temperature are the main parameters that should be considered for providing a proper fermentation conditions. Understanding the basic parameters that determine the progress of the fermentation process in table olive production and the effects of these parameters on the process is of key importance for process control, acceleration and development of new production methods in table olive production. In this study, the factors determining the process conditions in table olive production were investigated.

Keywords

Fermentation, Olive, Process, Table olive, Parameter, Condition

References

• Alak S. 2016. Gemlik tipi sele zeytini üretiminde zeytin fermentasyon sürecinin mikrobiyolojik olarak işlenmesi ve pastörizasyonun ürünün raf ömrü üzerine etkisinin araştırılması. Master Thesis T.C. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gıda Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Bursa, Turkey.
• Anagnostopoulos D., Bozoudi D. & Tsaltas D. 2017. Yeast ecology of fermented table olives: a tool for biotechnological applications. Yeast-Industrial Applications, Intech Open, Rijeka, Croatia, 135-152.
• Aponte M., Ventorino V., Blaiotta G., Volpe G., Farina V., Avellone G., Lanza C.M. & Moschetti G. 2010. Study of green Sicilian table olive fermentations through microbiological, chemical and sensory analyses. Food Microbiology, 27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.09.010
• Barilacqua A., Corbo M.R. & Sinigaglia M. 2012. Selection of yeasts as starter cultures for table olives: a step by step procedure. Frontiers in Microbiology, 3, 194. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00194
• Bautista-Gallego S., Arroge-Lopez F.N., Romero-Gil V., Rodriguez-Gomez F., Garcia-Garcia P. & Garrido-Fernandez A. 2013. Microbial stability and quality of seasoned cracked green Alorena table olives packed in diverse chloride salt mixtures. Journal of Food Protection, 76, (11). doi: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-504
• Bleve G., Turfariello M., Durante M., Perbellini E., Ramires F.A., Grieco F., Cappello M.S., Domenico S., Mita G., Tasioula-Margari M. & Logrieca A.F. 2014. Phsico-chemical and microbiological characterization of spontaneous fermentation of Cellina di Nardo and Leccino table olives. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 570. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00570
• Bonatsou S., Tassou C.C., Panagou E.Z. & Nychas G.J.E. 2017. Table olive fermentation using starter cultures with multifunctional potential. Microorganisms, 5, 30. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020030
• Botta C. & Cocolin L. 2012. Microbial Dynamics and biodiversity in table olive fermentation: culture-dependent and independent approaches. Frontiers in Microbiology, 3, 245. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00245
• Borcakli M., Özay G., Alperden I., Özsan E. & Erdek Y. 1993. Changes in chemical and microbiological composition of two varieties of olive during fermentation. Grasas Aceites, 44, 4-5.
• Campus M., Sedda P., Cauli E., Piras F., Comunian R., Paba A., Paga E., Schirru S., Argioni A., Zurru R. & Bandino G. 2015. Evaluation of a single strain starter culture, a selected inoculum enrichment, and natural microflora in the processing of Tonda di Cagliari natural table olives: Impact on chemical, microbiological, sensory and texture quality: Impact on chemical, microbiological, sensory and texture quality. Food Science and Technology, 64. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.019