Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap

Volume: 11 Number: 3 September 1, 2014
  • Suheyl Haytoglu
  • Gurkan Kayabasoglu
  • Ozan Seymen Sezen
EN TR

Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap

Abstract

Compare postoperative achievement of pillar palatal implant and uvulopalatal flap by polysomnographic and subjective methods after 1 year in obstructive sleep apnea and snoring patients. This study was retrospectively performed on 117 patients. An Epworth sleepiness scale for patients, obtained after the polysomnograpy during the preoperative and the 1st year of postoperative periods were filled. Patients answered a scale for daytime sleepiness and the spouse filled another scale for the snoring and apnea grading. The pillar palatal implant technique was used in 59 patients and 58 had an uvulopalatal flap. Preoperative and 1st postoperative year data was compared. The level of satisfaction of patients was determined. No any changes were determined in the pillar palatal implant group, while a significant decrease was determined in apnea hypopnea index levels in the uvulopalatal flap group. A significant decrease was obtained at the postoperative Epworth level in the pillar palatal implant group. The decrease is significant in the uvulopalatal flap group. The uvulopalatal flap was preferable for apnea and daytime sleepiness of patients in mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome groups. For simple snoring patients, the pillar palatal implant method is preferred

Keywords

References

  1. Lugaresi E, Plazzi G. Heavy snorer disease: from snoring to the sleep apnea syndrome-an overview. Respiration 1997;64 (suppl 1):11-4.
  2. Kryger MH. Fat, sleep, and Charles Dickens: Literary and medical contributions to the understanding of sleep ap- nea. Clin Chest Med 1985;6(4):555-62.
  3. Calverley PM. Sleep-related breathing disorders. Thorax 1995;50(12):1311-6.
  4. Boot H, van Wegen R, Poublon RM, Bogaard JM, Schmitz PI, van der Meché FG. Long-term results of uvulopala- topharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Laryngoscope 2000;110(3 Pt 1):469-75.
  5. Jäghagen EL, Berggren D, Dahlqvist A, Isberg A.Prediction and risk of dysphagia after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and uvulopalatoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124(10):1197- 203.
  6. Friedman M, Vidyasagar R, Bliznikas D, Joseph NJ. Patient selection and efficacy of pillar implant technique for treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea/ hypopnea syndrome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134(2):187-96.
  7. Nordgård S, Stene BK, Skjostad KW. Soft palate implants for the treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134(4):565-70.
  8. Maurer JT, Hein G, Verse T, Hörmann K, Stuck BA.Long- term results of palatal implants for primary snoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133(4):573-8.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Suheyl Haytoglu This is me

Gurkan Kayabasoglu This is me

Ozan Seymen Sezen This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2014

Submission Date

April 27, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2014 Volume: 11 Number: 3

APA
Haytoglu, S., Kayabasoglu, G., & Sezen, O. S. (2014). Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap. European Journal of General Medicine, 11(3), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.15197/sabad.1.11.66
AMA
1.Haytoglu S, Kayabasoglu G, Sezen OS. Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap. European Journal of General Medicine. 2014;11(3):179-186. doi:10.15197/sabad.1.11.66
Chicago
Haytoglu, Suheyl, Gurkan Kayabasoglu, and Ozan Seymen Sezen. 2014. “Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap”. European Journal of General Medicine 11 (3): 179-86. https://doi.org/10.15197/sabad.1.11.66.
EndNote
Haytoglu S, Kayabasoglu G, Sezen OS (September 1, 2014) Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap. European Journal of General Medicine 11 3 179–186.
IEEE
[1]S. Haytoglu, G. Kayabasoglu, and O. S. Sezen, “Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap”, European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 179–186, Sept. 2014, doi: 10.15197/sabad.1.11.66.
ISNAD
Haytoglu, Suheyl - Kayabasoglu, Gurkan - Sezen, Ozan Seymen. “Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap”. European Journal of General Medicine 11/3 (September 1, 2014): 179-186. https://doi.org/10.15197/sabad.1.11.66.
JAMA
1.Haytoglu S, Kayabasoglu G, Sezen OS. Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap. European Journal of General Medicine. 2014;11:179–186.
MLA
Haytoglu, Suheyl, et al. “Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap”. European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, Sept. 2014, pp. 179-86, doi:10.15197/sabad.1.11.66.
Vancouver
1.Suheyl Haytoglu, Gurkan Kayabasoglu, Ozan Seymen Sezen. Comparison of Two Techniques in Simple Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients: Palatal Implant or Uvulopalatal Flap. European Journal of General Medicine. 2014 Sep. 1;11(3):179-86. doi:10.15197/sabad.1.11.66