Clinical results after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Year 2012, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 91 - 97, 01.06.2012

M Hafit Gür Köksal Yuca Adnan Cinal A.faruk Kıroğlu Hakan Çankaya Y Kursad Varsak

Abstract

Keywords

-

Clinical results after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Abstract

-

Keywords

-

References

• Linberg JV, Mc Cormick SA. Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obsruction; a clinicopathologic report and biopsy technique. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1055-63.
• MacEven CJ, Young JDH, Barras CW, Ram B, White PS. Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora. Br J Ophtalmol 2001;85;314-8.
• Çinal A, Kutluhan A, Yaşar T, Şimşek Ş, Kırış M, İçli M. The comparison of the internal and external methods in the surgical treatment of chronic dacryocystitis. T Oft Gaz 1999;29:292-7.
• Küpper DS, Demarco RC, Resende R, et al. Endoscopic nasal dacryocystorhinostomy:result and advantages over the ex- ternal approach. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2005;71:356-60
• Knijnik D.Endonasal dacryocystrhinostomy in children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2005;71:726-8.
• Kuchar A, Lukas J, Steinkogler FJ. Bacteriology and an- tibiotic therapy in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruc- tion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:694-8.
• Whittet HB, Shun-shin GA, Awdry P. Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye 1993:7:545-9.
• Kong YT, Kim TI, Byung WK. A report of 131 cases of endoscopic laser lacrimal surgery. Opthalmology 1994:101:1793-800.
• Bartley GB. Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction: an etiologic classification system, case reports and review of literature. Opthalmol Plast Reconstr Surg 1992:8:237-42.
• Yung MW, Hardman_Lea S. Analysis of the results of surgi- cal endoscopic dacryocytorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 2002: 86: 792-4.
• Akıner M, Anadolu Y, Aktürk T, Uğurlubaş SH, Zilelioğlu G. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;4:44-8.
• Weıdnbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W; Endoscopic endo- nasal dacryocystorhinostomy; Results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103;363-7.
• Önerci M, Orhan M. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhi- nostomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;2(3):219-22.
• Mclahlan DL, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC:Results of dac- ryocystorhinostomy Analysis of reoperations. Ophthalmic Surg 1980;11:427-30.
• Benger R, Forer M. Endonasal dacryocystorhinos- tomy primary and secondary. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1993;21(3):157-9.
• Rice DH. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinosto- my in four patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116(9):1061.
• Mcdonogh M. Endoscopic Transnasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Endoscopic transnasal dacryo- cystorhinostomy. Results in 21 patients. S Afr J Surg 1992;30(3):107-10.
• Önerci M, Orhan M, Öğretmenoğlu O, İrkeç M. Long- term results and reasons for failure of intranasal Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120(2):319-22.
• Sodhi PK, Pandey RM, Malik KPS. Experience with bicana- licular intubation of the lacrimal drainage apparatus combined with conventional external dacryocystorhinos- tomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003;31:187-90
• Argın A, Duman S, Örnek F. The role of the silicon intu- bation in dacryocystorhinostomy (Turkish). J Mersin Univ Med Faculty 2001;3:281-4
• Metson R. The Endoscopic Approach for Revision Dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope1990;100:1344-7.
• Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PA. The evolution of endo- nasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surg Ophthalmol 2003;48: 73-84.
• Ünlü HH, Toprak B, Aslan A, Güler C. Comparison of surgi- cal outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinosto- my with and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111: 704-9.
• Şan İ, Gürler B. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: ‘Operative problems in the initial cases’. Turk Arch Otolaryngol 2002;40:258-63
• Munk PL, Lin DT, Morris DC. Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystorhinostomy with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 1990; 177(13):687-90.
• Luchtenberg M, Kuhli C, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Yan B, Ohrloff C, Berkefeld J. Three-dimensional rota- tional dacryocystography for imaging of the lacrimal draining system and adjacent anatomical structures. Ophthalmologica 2005;219(3):136-41.
• Yoshii M. External Dacryocystorhinostomy: outcomes af- ter the introduction of two new forceps and transnasal endoscopy. Med Sci Monit 2004;10(3):39-42.
• Yazici B, Yazici Z. Final nasolacrimal ostium after ex- ternal dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121(1):76-80.
• Boboridis KG, Bunce C, Rose GE. Outcome of external dac- ryocystorhinostomy combined with membranectomy of a distal canalicular obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139(6):1051-5.
• Kashkouli MB, Parvaresh M, Modarreszadeh M, Hashemi M, Beigi B. Factors affecting the success of external dac- ryocystorhinostomy. Orbit 2003; 22(4):247-55.
• Groessl SA, Sires BS, Bradley N. An anatomical basis for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:71-4
• Örnek F, Duman S, Kasım A. The causes of the lacrimal drainage system obstructions that can not be monitorized with a contrast agent and the surgical approach. T Klin Ophtalmology 1996;5(3):206-8.
• Cuthbertson FM, Webber S. Assessment of functional na- solacrimal duct obstruction survey of ophthalmologists in the southwest. Eye 2004;18(1):20-3.
• Becker BB. Dacryocystorhinostomy without flaps. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19(6):419-27.
• Boush GA, Bradley NL. Dortzbach RK. Results of endona- sal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Opthalmology 1994:101:955-59 .
• Wearne M, Pitts J, Frank J, and Rose G. Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the di- agnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83(9):1032–5.
• Çokkeser Y, Evreklioğlu C, Er H. Comparative exter- nal versus endoscopic dacryocytorhinostomy: Results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000:123(4): 488-91.