The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture

Volume: 8 Number: 3 September 1, 2011
  • Mehmet Yılmaz
  • Ünal İsaoğlu
  • Sedat Kadanalı
EN TR

The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Farmer RM, Kirschbaum T, Potter D, Strong TH, Medearis AL. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:996-1001
  2. Lynch JC, Parady JP. Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence. A five-year survey. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:699- 704
  3. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Obstetrical hemorrhage. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010
  4. Nielsen TF, Ljungblad U, Hagborg H. Rupture and dehis- cence of caesarean section scar during pregnancy and de- livery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:569-73
  5. Tamale-Sali EG, Iskandar MN. Is there a risk of lower seg- ment scar rupture in pregnancy after multiple caesarean sections? J Obstet Gynecol 1992;12:19-21
  6. Miller DA,Diaz FG,Paul RH.Vajinal birth after caesarean: A 10-yearexperience.Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:255-8
  7. Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Sahin HG, Kamaci M. Eight years’ experience of uterine rupture cases. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:458-61
  8. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Prior cesarean delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Mehmet Yılmaz This is me

Ünal İsaoğlu This is me

Sedat Kadanalı This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2011

Submission Date

April 27, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Yılmaz, M., İsaoğlu, Ü., & Kadanalı, S. (2011). The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine, 8(3), 195-198. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM
AMA
1.Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8(3):195-198. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM
Chicago
Yılmaz, Mehmet, Ünal İsaoğlu, and Sedat Kadanalı. 2011. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine 8 (3): 195-98. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM.
EndNote
Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S (September 1, 2011) The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine 8 3 195–198.
IEEE
[1]M. Yılmaz, Ü. İsaoğlu, and S. Kadanalı, “The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture”, European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 195–198, Sept. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Mehmet - İsaoğlu, Ünal - Kadanalı, Sedat. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine 8/3 (September 1, 2011): 195-198. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8:195–198.
MLA
Yılmaz, Mehmet, et al. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2011, pp. 195-8, https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Yılmaz, Ünal İsaoğlu, Sedat Kadanalı. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine [Internet]. 2011 Sep. 1;8(3):195-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM