EN
TR
References
- Farmer RM, Kirschbaum T, Potter D, Strong TH, Medearis AL. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:996-1001
- Lynch JC, Parady JP. Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence. A five-year survey. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:699- 704
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Obstetrical hemorrhage. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010
- Nielsen TF, Ljungblad U, Hagborg H. Rupture and dehis- cence of caesarean section scar during pregnancy and de- livery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:569-73
- Tamale-Sali EG, Iskandar MN. Is there a risk of lower seg- ment scar rupture in pregnancy after multiple caesarean sections? J Obstet Gynecol 1992;12:19-21
- Miller DA,Diaz FG,Paul RH.Vajinal birth after caesarean: A 10-yearexperience.Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:255-8
- Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Sahin HG, Kamaci M. Eight years’ experience of uterine rupture cases. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:458-61
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Prior cesarean delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
September 1, 2011
Submission Date
April 27, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2011 Volume: 8 Number: 3
APA
Yılmaz, M., İsaoğlu, Ü., & Kadanalı, S. (2011). The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine, 8(3), 195-198. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM
AMA
1.Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8(3):195-198. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM
Chicago
Yılmaz, Mehmet, Ünal İsaoğlu, and Sedat Kadanalı. 2011. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine 8 (3): 195-98. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM.
EndNote
Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S (September 1, 2011) The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine 8 3 195–198.
IEEE
[1]M. Yılmaz, Ü. İsaoğlu, and S. Kadanalı, “The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture”, European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 195–198, Sept. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Mehmet - İsaoğlu, Ünal - Kadanalı, Sedat. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine 8/3 (September 1, 2011): 195-198. https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8:195–198.
MLA
Yılmaz, Mehmet, et al. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2011, pp. 195-8, https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Yılmaz, Ünal İsaoğlu, Sedat Kadanalı. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine [Internet]. 2011 Sep. 1;8(3):195-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA25XX97WM