BibTex RIS Cite

The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture

Year 2011, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 195 - 198, 01.09.2011

Abstract

References

  • Farmer RM, Kirschbaum T, Potter D, Strong TH, Medearis AL. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:996-1001
  • Lynch JC, Parady JP. Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence. A five-year survey. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:699- 704
  • Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Obstetrical hemorrhage. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010
  • Nielsen TF, Ljungblad U, Hagborg H. Rupture and dehis- cence of caesarean section scar during pregnancy and de- livery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:569-73
  • Tamale-Sali EG, Iskandar MN. Is there a risk of lower seg- ment scar rupture in pregnancy after multiple caesarean sections? J Obstet Gynecol 1992;12:19-21
  • Miller DA,Diaz FG,Paul RH.Vajinal birth after caesarean: A 10-yearexperience.Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:255-8
  • Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Sahin HG, Kamaci M. Eight years’ experience of uterine rupture cases. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:458-61
  • Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Prior cesarean delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010
  • Moslek R, Sabagh TO. Ruptured uterus still an obstetric problem. Saudi Medical Journal 1987;8:495-8
  • Roungsipragarn R, Chaturachinda K. Rupture of the preg- nant uterus: Ramathibodi's experience 1981-1990. J Med Assoc Thai 1993;l:48-51
  • Hofmeyr GJ, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: The preva- lence of uterine rupture. BJOG 2005;112:1221-8
  • Ozdemir I, Yucel N, Yucel O. Rupture of the pregnant uter- us: A 9-year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;272:229-31
  • Bakour SH, Nassif B, Nwosu EC. Outcome of ruptured uterus at University Teaching Hospital Aleppo, Syria. J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;18:424-8
  • Pelosi III MA, Pelosi MA. Spontaneous uterine rupture at thirty-three weeks subsequent to previous superfi- cial laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1547-9
  • Sahin HG, Kolusarı A, Yıldızhan R, Kurdoglu M, Adalı E, Kamacı M. Uterine rupture: A twelve-year clinical analy- sis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:503-6
  • Chazotte C,Cohen WR. Catastrophic complications of previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:738-42.
  • Flamm BL,Newman LA,Thomas SJ,Fallon DToshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery:results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76:750-4
  • 18.Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop CM, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:872-6
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist.1998. Postpartum hemorrhage. ACOG Educational Bulletin No. 243. Washington DC: ACOG.
  • Flamm B. Once cesarean, always a controversy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:312-5
  • 21.Saglamtas M, Vicdan K, Yalcin H, Yilmaz Z, Yesilyurt H, Gokmen O. Rupture of uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;49:9-15
  • Chuni N. Analysis of uterine rupture in tertiary center in Eastern Nepal: Lesson for obstetric care. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2006;32:574-9
  • Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rup- ture: Risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1042-6
  • Aguero O, Kizer S. Obstetric prognosis of the repair of uterinerupture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968;127:528-30

The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture

Year 2011, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 195 - 198, 01.09.2011

Abstract

-

References

  • Farmer RM, Kirschbaum T, Potter D, Strong TH, Medearis AL. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:996-1001
  • Lynch JC, Parady JP. Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence. A five-year survey. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:699- 704
  • Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Obstetrical hemorrhage. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010
  • Nielsen TF, Ljungblad U, Hagborg H. Rupture and dehis- cence of caesarean section scar during pregnancy and de- livery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:569-73
  • Tamale-Sali EG, Iskandar MN. Is there a risk of lower seg- ment scar rupture in pregnancy after multiple caesarean sections? J Obstet Gynecol 1992;12:19-21
  • Miller DA,Diaz FG,Paul RH.Vajinal birth after caesarean: A 10-yearexperience.Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:255-8
  • Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Sahin HG, Kamaci M. Eight years’ experience of uterine rupture cases. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:458-61
  • Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Prior cesarean delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics edited by Cunningham FG, , Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. 23st edn. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. 2010
  • Moslek R, Sabagh TO. Ruptured uterus still an obstetric problem. Saudi Medical Journal 1987;8:495-8
  • Roungsipragarn R, Chaturachinda K. Rupture of the preg- nant uterus: Ramathibodi's experience 1981-1990. J Med Assoc Thai 1993;l:48-51
  • Hofmeyr GJ, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: The preva- lence of uterine rupture. BJOG 2005;112:1221-8
  • Ozdemir I, Yucel N, Yucel O. Rupture of the pregnant uter- us: A 9-year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;272:229-31
  • Bakour SH, Nassif B, Nwosu EC. Outcome of ruptured uterus at University Teaching Hospital Aleppo, Syria. J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;18:424-8
  • Pelosi III MA, Pelosi MA. Spontaneous uterine rupture at thirty-three weeks subsequent to previous superfi- cial laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1547-9
  • Sahin HG, Kolusarı A, Yıldızhan R, Kurdoglu M, Adalı E, Kamacı M. Uterine rupture: A twelve-year clinical analy- sis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:503-6
  • Chazotte C,Cohen WR. Catastrophic complications of previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:738-42.
  • Flamm BL,Newman LA,Thomas SJ,Fallon DToshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery:results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76:750-4
  • 18.Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop CM, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:872-6
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist.1998. Postpartum hemorrhage. ACOG Educational Bulletin No. 243. Washington DC: ACOG.
  • Flamm B. Once cesarean, always a controversy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:312-5
  • 21.Saglamtas M, Vicdan K, Yalcin H, Yilmaz Z, Yesilyurt H, Gokmen O. Rupture of uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;49:9-15
  • Chuni N. Analysis of uterine rupture in tertiary center in Eastern Nepal: Lesson for obstetric care. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2006;32:574-9
  • Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rup- ture: Risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1042-6
  • Aguero O, Kizer S. Obstetric prognosis of the repair of uterinerupture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968;127:528-30
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Mehmet Yılmaz This is me

Ünal İsaoğlu This is me

Sedat Kadanalı This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Yılmaz, M., İsaoğlu, Ü., & Kadanalı, S. (2011). The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine, 8(3), 195-198.
AMA Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine. September 2011;8(3):195-198.
Chicago Yılmaz, Mehmet, Ünal İsaoğlu, and Sedat Kadanalı. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine 8, no. 3 (September 2011): 195-98.
EndNote Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S (September 1, 2011) The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine 8 3 195–198.
IEEE M. Yılmaz, Ü. İsaoğlu, and S. Kadanalı, “The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture”, European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 195–198, 2011.
ISNAD Yılmaz, Mehmet et al. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine 8/3 (September 2011), 195-198.
JAMA Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8:195–198.
MLA Yılmaz, Mehmet et al. “The Evaluation of 61 Turkish Pregnancy Women Uterine Rupture”. European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, 2011, pp. 195-8.
Vancouver Yılmaz M, İsaoğlu Ü, Kadanalı S. The evaluation of 61 turkish pregnancy women uterine rupture. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8(3):195-8.