BibTex RIS Cite

Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy

Year 2011, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 31 - 35, 01.03.2011

Mustafa Koplay Elif Aksakalli Serdar Toker Seda Ozbek Ali Sami Kivrak

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

  • Chang CY, Wu HT, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hung SC. Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: a com- parative MR imaging and arthroscopic study. Clin Imaging 2004;28:372-6.
  • Parizel PM, Dijkstra HA, Geenen GP, et al. Low-field ver- sus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:132-8.
  • Stoller DW, Knee,1 st ed, in: Stoller DW, Tirman PF, Bredaella MA, Beltran S, Branstetter RM, Blease SC (Eds.),Diagnostic Imagig Orthopaedics,Amırsys Publishing Company, Canada, 2006; 5-2-41.
  • Cevikol C, Karaali K, Esen G, et al. MR imaging of menis- cal tears at low-field (0.35 T) and high-field (1.5 T) MR units. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004;10; 316-19.
  • Quinn SF, Brown TR, Szumowski J. Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 pa- tients. Radiology 1992;185:577-80.
  • Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:21-44.
  • Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic reso- nance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
  • Rand T, Imhof H, Turetschek K, et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the dif- ferentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:22-7.
  • Kinnunen J, Bondestam S, Kivioja A, et al. Diagnostic per- formance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1155-60.
  • Kladny B, Glückert K, Swoboda B, Beyer W, Weseloh G. Comparison of low-field (0.2Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:281-6.
  • Cotten A, Delfaut E, Demondion X, et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1093-7
  • Krampla W, Roesel M, Svoboda K, Nachbagauer A, Gschwantler M, Hruby W. MRI of the knee: how do field strength and radiologist's experience influence diagnostic accuracy and interobserver correlation in assessing chon- dral and meniscal lesions and the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament? Eur Radiol 2009;19:1519-28.

Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy

Year 2011, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 31 - 35, 01.03.2011

Mustafa Koplay Elif Aksakalli Serdar Toker Seda Ozbek Ali Sami Kivrak

Abstract

-

Keywords

-

References

  • Chang CY, Wu HT, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hung SC. Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: a com- parative MR imaging and arthroscopic study. Clin Imaging 2004;28:372-6.
  • Parizel PM, Dijkstra HA, Geenen GP, et al. Low-field ver- sus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:132-8.
  • Stoller DW, Knee,1 st ed, in: Stoller DW, Tirman PF, Bredaella MA, Beltran S, Branstetter RM, Blease SC (Eds.),Diagnostic Imagig Orthopaedics,Amırsys Publishing Company, Canada, 2006; 5-2-41.
  • Cevikol C, Karaali K, Esen G, et al. MR imaging of menis- cal tears at low-field (0.35 T) and high-field (1.5 T) MR units. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004;10; 316-19.
  • Quinn SF, Brown TR, Szumowski J. Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 pa- tients. Radiology 1992;185:577-80.
  • Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:21-44.
  • Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic reso- nance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
  • Rand T, Imhof H, Turetschek K, et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the dif- ferentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:22-7.
  • Kinnunen J, Bondestam S, Kivioja A, et al. Diagnostic per- formance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1155-60.
  • Kladny B, Glückert K, Swoboda B, Beyer W, Weseloh G. Comparison of low-field (0.2Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:281-6.
  • Cotten A, Delfaut E, Demondion X, et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1093-7
  • Krampla W, Roesel M, Svoboda K, Nachbagauer A, Gschwantler M, Hruby W. MRI of the knee: how do field strength and radiologist's experience influence diagnostic accuracy and interobserver correlation in assessing chon- dral and meniscal lesions and the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament? Eur Radiol 2009;19:1519-28.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Mustafa Koplay This is me

Elif Aksakalli This is me

Serdar Toker This is me

Seda Ozbek This is me

Ali Sami Kivrak This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Koplay, M., Aksakalli, E., Toker, S., Ozbek, S., et al. (2011). Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine, 8(1), 31-35.
AMA Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Toker S, Ozbek S, Kivrak AS. Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine. March 2011;8(1):31-35.
Chicago Koplay, Mustafa, Elif Aksakalli, Serdar Toker, Seda Ozbek, and Ali Sami Kivrak. “Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MRI Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation With Arthroscopy”. European Journal of General Medicine 8, no. 1 (March 2011): 31-35.
EndNote Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Toker S, Ozbek S, Kivrak AS (March 1, 2011) Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine 8 1 31–35.
IEEE M. Koplay, E. Aksakalli, S. Toker, S. Ozbek, and A. S. Kivrak, “Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy”, European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2011.
ISNAD Koplay, Mustafa et al. “Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MRI Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation With Arthroscopy”. European Journal of General Medicine 8/1 (March 2011), 31-35.
JAMA Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Toker S, Ozbek S, Kivrak AS. Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8:31–35.
MLA Koplay, Mustafa et al. “Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MRI Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation With Arthroscopy”. European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, 2011, pp. 31-35.
Vancouver Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Toker S, Ozbek S, Kivrak AS. Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8(1):31-5.