Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview

Berna Kaval; Engin Kapkın; Mustafa Sinan Kaynak

doi:10.55971/EJLS.1181158

EN

Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview

Abstract

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is one of the most extensively researched methods for producing nano/micro scale biomaterials. This method is typically applied layer by layer. The 3DP method has many advantages over traditional manufacturing methods and ensures that personalized drug design is feasible. Individual dose adjustment provides significant benefits, particularly in some disadvantaged patient groups. Individual release characteristics may be required in these patient groups in addition to dose adjustment. 3DP technology also allows for the adjustment of release kinetics. All of these factors were also increasing interest in 3DP technology in the pharmaceutical industry. The goal of this review is to understand the pharmacological significance of 3DP technology as well as the parameters influencing the release profiles in tablets produced by using technique, and to establish a correlation between them. Within the scope of this review, 79 literature research studies were examined, and it was determined that there is limited data to determine whether there is a correlation between release kinetics and 3DP techniques. When the release profiles obtained by considering the polymer type used in these techniques are evaluated, immediate and rapid release was obtained in studies using PVA + PLA polymers and studies using PVP polymer, immediate release in studies using Kollidon® and Kollicoat® derivatives, and controlled, extended and sustained release was observed in studies using PCL polymer.

Keywords

References

1. Curry EJ, Henoun AD, Miller AN 3rd, Nguyen TD. 3D nano- and micro-patterning of biomaterials for controlled drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2017;8(1):15-28. https://doi.org/10.4155/tde-2016-0052
2. Lavan DA, McGuire T, Langer R. Small-scale systems for in vivo drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(10):1184-1191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt876
3. Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(2):115-124. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1304
4. Kaynak MS, Kaş HS, Levent Ö. Formulation of controlled release glipizide pellets using pan coating method. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy. 2007;27(2):93-106.
5. Langer R. New methods of drug delivery. Science. 1990;249(4976):1527-1533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2218494
6. Liversidge GG, Cundy KC, Bishop JF, Czekai DA, inventors; Particulate Prospects Corp, Elan Corp PLC, Elan Pharma International Ltd, assignee. Surface modified drug nanoparticles. United States patent DC 5,145,684. 1992.
7. Fang C, Bhattarai N, Sun C, Zhang M. Functionalized nanoparticles with long-term stability in biological media. Small. 2009;5(14):1637-1641. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801647
8. Kholgh Eshkalak S, Rezvani Ghomi E, Dai Y, Choudhury D, Ramakrishna S. The role of three-dimensional printing in healthcare and medicine. Materials & Design. 2020;194:108940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108940

9. Basgul C, Yu T, MacDonald DW, Siskey R, Marcolongo M, Kurtz SM. Structure-Property Relationships for 3D printed PEEK Intervertebral Lumbar Cages Produced using Fused Filament Fabrication. J Mater Res. 2018;33(14):2040-2051. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.178
10. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212-10290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
11. Kjar A, Huang Y. Application of Micro-Scale 3D Printing in Pharmaceutics. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(8):390. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11080390
12. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2018;143:172-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
13. Dizon JRC, Espera AH Jr, Chen Q, Advincula RC. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Additive Manufacturing. 2018;20:44-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002
14. Honigmann P, Sharma N, Okolo B, Popp U, Msallem B, Thieringer FM. Patient-Specific Surgical Implants Made of 3D Printed PEEK: Material, Technology, and Scope of Surgical Application. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:4520636. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4520636
15. Goyanes A, Wang J, Buanz A, et al. 3D Printing of Medicines: Engineering Novel Oral Devices with Unique Design and Drug Release Characteristics. Mol Pharm. 2015;12(11):4077-4084. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00510
16. Scoutaris N, Alexander MR, Gellert PR, Roberts CJ. Inkjet printing as a novel medicine formulation technique. J Control Release. 2011;156(2):179-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.033
17. Skowyra J, Pietrzak K, Alhnan MA. Fabrication of extended-release patient-tailored prednisolone tablets via fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;68:11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.11.009
18. Tutton R. Personalizing medicine: futures present and past. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(10):1721-1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.031
19. Sen K, Manchanda A, Mehta T, Ma AWK, Chaudhuri B. Formulation design for inkjet-based 3D printed tablets. Int J Pharm. 2020;584:119430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119430
20. Infanger S, Haemmerli A, Iliev S, Baier A, Stoyanov E, Quodbach J. Powder bed 3D-printing of highly loaded drug delivery devices with hydroxypropyl cellulose as solid binder. Int J Pharm. 2019;555:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.11.048
21. Khan FA, Narasimhan K, Swathi CSV, et al. 3D Printing Technology in Customized Drug Delivery System: Current State of the Art, Prospective and the Challenges. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(42):5049-5061. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612825666190110153742
22. Jamroz W, Kurek M, Lyszczarz E, Brniak W, Jachowicz R. Printing techniques: recent developments in pharmaceutical technology. Acta Pol Pharm. 2017;74(3):753-763.
23. Lim SH, Kathuria H, Tan JJY, Kang L. 3D printed drug delivery and testing systems - a passing fad or the future? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:139-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.05.006
24. Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31(24):6121-6130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
25. Devi L, Gaba P, Chopra H. Tailormade Drug Delivery System: A Novel Trio Concept of 3DP+ Hydrogel+ SLA. J Drug Delivery Ther. 2019;9(4-s):861-866. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v9i4-s.3458
26. Zhou T, Zhang L, Yao Q, et al. SLA 3D printing of high quality spine shaped β-TCP bioceramics for the hard tissue repair applications. Ceramics International. 2020;46(6):7609-7614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.261
27. Zhang J, Hu Q, Wang S, Tao J, Gou M. Digital Light Processing Based Three-dimensional Printing for Medical Applications. Int J Bioprint. 2019;6(1):242. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242
28. Chartrain NA, Williams CB, Whittington AR. A review on fabricating tissue scaffolds using vat photopolymerization. Acta Biomater. 2018;74:90-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.010
29. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, et al. Additive manufacturing. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science. 2015;347(6228):1349-1352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2397
30. Whitehead J, Lipson H. Inverted multi-material laser sintering. Additive Manufacturing. 2020;36:101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101440
31. Anderson I. Mechanical properties of specimens 3D printed with virgin and recycled polylactic acid. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. 2017;4(2):110-115. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2016.0054
32. Bakshi KR, Mulay AV. A review on selective laser sintering: a rapid prototyping technology. IOSR. 2016;04(04):53-57. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-15008040453-57
33. Kumar S. Selective laser sintering: a qualitative and objective approach. JOM. 2003;55(10):43-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-003-0175-y
34. Agarwala M, Bourell D, Beaman J, Marcus H, Barlow J. Direct selective laser sintering of metals. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 1995;1(1):26-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552549510078113
35. Kruth JP, Wang X, Laoui T, Froyen L. Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering. Assembly Automation. 2003;23(4):357-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150310698652
36. Haryńska A, Kucinska-Lipka J, Sulowska A, Gubanska I, Kostrzewa M, Janik H. Medical-Grade PCL Based Polyurethane System for FDM 3D Printing-Characterization and Fabrication. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(6):887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060887
37. Gnanasekaran K, Heijmans T, van Bennekom S, et al. 3D printing of CNT- and graphene-based conductive polymer nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. Applied Materials Today. 2017;9:21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.003
38. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Materials & Design. 2010;31(1):287-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016
39. Panraksa P, Udomsom S, Rachtanapun P, Chittasupho C, Ruksiriwanich W, Jantrawut P. Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose E15: A Hydrophilic Polymer for Fabrication of Orodispersible Film Using Syringe Extrusion 3D Printer. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(11):2666. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112666
40. Loh GH, Pei E, Harrison D, Monzón MD. An overview of functionally graded additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing. 2018;23:34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.023
41. Salcedo E, Baek D, Berndt A, Ryu JE. Simulation and validation of three dimension functionally graded materials by material jetting. Additive Manufacturing. 2018;22:351-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.027
42. Tee YL, Tran P, Leary M, Pille P, Brandt M. 3D Printing of polymer composites with material jetting: Mechanical and fractographic analysis. Additive Manufacturing. 2020;36:101558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101558
43. Prasad LK, Smyth H. 3D Printing technologies for drug delivery: a review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(7):1019-1031. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743
44. Reis N, Ainsley C, Derby B. Ink-jet delivery of particle suspensions by piezoelectric droplet ejectors. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;97(9):094903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1888026
45. Bai Y, Wagner G, Williams CB. Effect of particle size distribution on powder packing and sintering in binder jetting additive manufacturing of metals. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2017;139(8). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036640
46. Wilts EM, Long TE. Thiol-ene addition enables tailored synthesis of poly(2-oxazoline)-graft-poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) copolymers for binder jetting 3D printing. Polym Int. 2020;69(10):902-911. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.6074
47. Champion JA, Katare YK, Mitragotri S. Particle shape: a new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. J Control Release. 2007;121(1-2):3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.03.022
48. Khadka P, Ro J, Kim H, et al. Pharmaceutical particle technologies: An approach to improve drug solubility, dissolution and bioavailability. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014;9(6):304-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2014.05.005
49. Sun J, Wang F, Sui Y, et al. Effect of particle size on solubility, dissolution rate, and oral bioavailability: evaluation using coenzyme Q₁₀ as naked nanocrystals. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:5733-5744. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S34365
50. Junghanns J-UAH, Müller RH. Nanocrystal technology, drug delivery and clinical applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(3):295-309. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s595
51. Williams HD, Trevaskis NL, Charman SA, et al. Strategies to address low drug solubility in discovery and development. Pharmacol Rev. 2013;65(1):315-499. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.005660
52. Zhang Y, Chan HF, Leong KW. Advanced materials and processing for drug delivery: the past and the future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(1):104-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.003
53. Bajpai SK, Kirar N. Swelling and drug release behavior of calcium alginate/poly (sodium acrylate) hydrogel beads. Designed Monomers and Polymers. 2015;19(1):89-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15685551.2015.1092016
54. Bhasarkar J, Bal D. Kinetic investigation of a controlled drug delivery system based on alginate scaffold with embedded voids. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2019;17(2):2280800018817462. https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800018817462
55. Wong BS, Teoh S-H, Kang L. Polycaprolactone scaffold as targeted drug delivery system and cell attachment scaffold for postsurgical care of limb salvage. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2012;2(4):272-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-012-0096-9
56. Cader HK, Rance GA, Alexander MR, et al. Water-based 3D inkjet printing of an oral pharmaceutical dosage form. Int J Pharm. 2019;564:359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.04.026
57. Wang J, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Stereolithographic (SLA) 3D printing of oral modified-release dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2016;503(1-2):207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016
58. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Yang J, Roberts CJ. 3D printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill with defined immediate and sustained release profiles. J Control Release. 2015;217:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.028
59. Clark EA, Alexander MR, Irvine DJ, et al. 3D printing of tablets using inkjet with UV photoinitiation. Int J Pharm. 2017;529(1-2):523-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.085
60. Fina F, Madla CM, Goyanes A, Zhang J, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Fabricating 3D printed orally disintegrating printlets using selective laser sintering. Int J Pharm. 2018;541(1-2):101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.02.015
61. Solanki NG, Tahsin M, Shah AV, Serajuddin ATM. Formulation of 3D Printed Tablet for Rapid Drug Release by Fused Deposition Modeling: Screening Polymers for Drug Release, Drug-Polymer Miscibility and Printability. J Pharm Sci. 2018;107(1):390-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2017.10.021
62. Goyanes A, Robles Martinez P, Buanz A, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Effect of geometry on drug release from 3D printed tablets. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(2):657-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.04.069
63. Sadia M, Arafat B, Ahmed W, Forbes RT, Alhnan MA. Channelled tablets: An innovative approach to accelerating drug release from 3D printed tablets. J Control Release. 2018;269:355-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.022
64. Wickström H, Palo M, Rijckaert K, et al. Improvement of dissolution rate of indomethacin by inkjet printing. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;75:91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2015.03.009
65. Pardeike J, Strohmeier DM, Schrödl N, et al. Nanosuspensions as advanced printing ink for accurate dosing of poorly soluble drugs in personalized medicines. Int J Pharm. 2011;420(1):93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.08.033
66. Cheow WS, Kiew TY, Hadinoto K. Combining inkjet printing and amorphous nanonization to prepare personalized dosage forms of poorly-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;96:314-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.08.012
67. Rowe CW, Katstra WE, Palazzolo RD, Giritlioglu B, Teung P, Cima MJ. Multimechanism oral dosage forms fabricated by three dimensional printing™. Journal of Controlled Release. 2000;66(1):11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00224-2
68. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Roberts CJ. Desktop 3D printing of controlled release pharmaceutical bilayer tablets. Int J Pharm. 2014;461(1-2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.021
69. Jivraj I I, Martini LG, Thomson CM. An overview of the different excipients useful for the direct compression of tablets. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2000;3(2):58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1461-5347(99)00237-0
70. Sastry SV, Nyshadham JR, Fix JA. Recent technological advances in oral drug delivery - a review. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2000;3(4):138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1461-5347(00)00247-9
71. Khaled SA, Burley JC, Alexander MR, Yang J, Roberts CJ. 3D printing of tablets containing multiple drugs with defined release profiles. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(2):643-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.07.067
72. Ilyés K, Kovács NK, Balogh A, et al. The applicability of pharmaceutical polymeric blends for the fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D technique: Material considerations-printability-process modulation, with consecutive effects on in vitro release, stability and degradation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;129:110-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2018.12.019
73. Matijašić G, Gretić M, Kezerić K, Petanjek J, Vukelić E. Preparation of Filaments and the 3D Printing of Dronedarone HCl Tablets for Treating Cardiac Arrhythmias. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019;20(8):310. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1522-9
74. Fina F, Goyanes A, Rowland M, Gaisford S, W Basit A. 3D Printing of Tunable Zero-Order Release Printlets. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(8):1769. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081769
75. Saviano M, Aquino RP, Del Gaudio P, Sansone F, Russo P. Poly(vinyl alcohol) 3D printed tablets: The effect of polymer particle size on drug loading and process efficiency. Int J Pharm. 2019;561:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.025
76. Li Q, Wen H, Jia D, et al. Preparation and investigation of controlled-release glipizide novel oral device with three-dimensional printing. Int J Pharm. 2017;525(1):5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.066
77. Linares V, Casas M, Caraballo I. Printfills: 3D printed systems combining fused deposition modeling and injection volume filling. Application to colon-specific drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019;134:138-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.11.021
78. Clark EA, Alexander MR, Irvine DJ, et al. Making tablets for delivery of poorly soluble drugs using photoinitiated 3D inkjet printing. Int J Pharm. 2020;578:118805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118805
79. Kempin W, Domsta V, Grathoff G, et al. Immediate Release 3D-Printed Tablets Produced Via Fused Deposition Modeling of a Thermo-Sensitive Drug. Pharm Res. 2018;35(6):124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2405-6
80. Kollamaram G, Croker DM, Walker GM, Goyanes A, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Low temperature fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing of thermolabile drugs. Int J Pharm. 2018;545(1-2):144-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.04.055
81. Jamróz W, Kurek M, Szafraniec-Szczęsny J, et al. Speed it up, slow it down…An issue of bicalutamide release from 3D printed tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;143:105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105169
82. Luongo F, Mangano FG, Macchi A, Luongo G, Mangano C. Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5862586. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5862586
83. Varan C, Wickström H, Sandler N, Aktaş Y, Bilensoy E. Inkjet printing of antiviral PCL nanoparticles and anticancer cyclodextrin inclusion complexes on bioadhesive film for cervical administration. Int J Pharm. 2017;531(2):701-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.036
83. Muwaffak Z, Goyanes A, Clark V, Basit AW, Hilton ST, Gaisford S. Patient-specific 3D scanned and 3D printed antimicrobial polycaprolactone wound dressings. Int J Pharm. 2017;527(1-2):161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.077
85. Fu J, Yu X, Jin Y. 3D printing of vaginal rings with personalized shapes for controlled release of progesterone. Int J Pharm. 2018;539(1-2):75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.01.036
86. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J, Basit AW, Gaisford S. 3D scanning and 3D printing as innovative technologies for fabricating personalized topical drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2016;234:41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.034
87. Lee K-J, Kang A, Delfino JJ, et al. Evaluation of critical formulation factors in the development of a rapidly dispersing captopril oral dosage form. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29(9):967-979. https://doi.org/10.1081/ddc-120025454
88. Pere CPP, Economidou SN, Lall G, et al. 3D printed microneedles for insulin skin delivery. Int J Pharm. 2018;544(2):425-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.031
89. Algahtani MS, Mohammed AA, Ahmad J, Saleh E. Development of a 3D Printed Coating Shell to Control the Drug Release of Encapsulated Immediate-Release Tablets. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061395
90. Pereira T, Kennedy JV, Potgieter J. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manufacturing. 2019;30:11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003
91. Park JY, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(4):294-302. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.294
92. Sinha SK. Additive manufacturing (AM) of medical devices and scaffolds for tissue engineering based on 3D and 4D printing. 3D and 4D Printing of Polymer Nanocomposite Materials, Elsevier; 2020. p. 119-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816805-9.00005-3
93. Beretta S, Romano S. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes. International Journal of Fatigue. 2017;94:178-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020
94. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Hatton GB, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printing of modified-release aminosalicylate (4-ASA and 5-ASA) tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;89:157-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.003
95. Yi H-G, Choi Y-J, Kang KS, et al. A 3D-printed local drug delivery patch for pancreatic cancer growth suppression. J Control Release. 2016;238:231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.015
96. Karakurt I, Aydoğdu A, Çıkrıkcı S, Orozco J, Lin L. Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing of ascorbic acid loaded hydrogels: A controlled release study. Int J Pharm. 2020;584:119428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119428
97. Healy AV, Fuenmayor E, Doran P, Geever LM, Higginbotham CL, Lyons JG. Additive Manufacturing of Personalized Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms via Stereolithography. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(12):645. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11120645
98. Goyanes A, Chang H, Sedough D, et al. Fabrication of controlled-release budesonide tablets via desktop (FDM) 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2015;496(2):414-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.039
99. Tagami T, Nagata N, Hayashi N, et al. Defined drug release from 3D-printed composite tablets consisting of drug-loaded polyvinylalcohol and a water-soluble or water-insoluble polymer filler. Int J Pharm. 2018;543(1-2):361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.057
100. Lim SH, Chia SMY, Kang L, Yap KY-L. Three-Dimensional Printing of Carbamazepine Sustained-Release Scaffold. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(7):2155-2163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.04.031
101. Tagami T, Yoshimura N, Goto E, Noda T, Ozeki T. Fabrication of Muco-Adhesive Oral Films by the 3D Printing of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose-Based Catechin-Loaded Formulations. Biol Pharm Bull. 2019;42(11):1898-1905. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b19-00481
102. Tagami T, Fukushige K, Ogawa E, Hayashi N, Ozeki T. 3D Printing Factors Important for the Fabrication of Polyvinylalcohol Filament-Based Tablets. Biol Pharm Bull. 2017;40(3):357-364. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b16-00878
103. Beck RCR, Chaves PS, Goyanes A, et al. 3D printed tablets loaded with polymeric nanocapsules: An innovative approach to produce customized drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2017;528(1-2):268-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.074
104. Costa PF, Puga AM, Díaz-Gomez L, Concheiro A, Busch DH, Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Additive manufacturing of scaffolds with dexamethasone controlled release for enhanced bone regeneration. Int J Pharm. 2015;496(2):541-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.055
105. Rattanakit P, Moulton SE, Santiago KS, Liawruangrath S, Wallace GG. Extrusion printed polymer structures: a facile and versatile approach to tailored drug delivery platforms. Int J Pharm. 2012;422(1-2):254-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.11.007
106. Li Q, Guan X, Cui M, et al. Preparation and investigation of novel gastro-floating tablets with 3D extrusion-based printing. Int J Pharm. 2018;535(1-2):325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.10.037
107. Tagami T, Ito E, Hayashi N, Sakai N, Ozeki T. Application of 3D printing technology for generating hollow-type suppository shells. Int J Pharm. 2020;589:119825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119825
108. Siyawamwaya M, du Toit LC, Kumar P, Choonara YE, Kondiah PPPD, Pillay V. 3D printed, controlled release, tritherapeutic tablet matrix for advanced anti-HIV-1 drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019;138:99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.04.007
109. Kyobula M, Adedeji A, Alexander MR, et al. 3D inkjet printing of tablets exploiting bespoke complex geometries for controlled and tuneable drug release. J Control Release. 2017;261:207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.025
110. Kao CT, Chen YJ, Huang TH, Lin YH, Hsu TT, Ho CC. Assessment of the Release Profile of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2-Load Mesoporous Calcium Silicate/Poly-ε-caprolactone 3D Scaffold for Regulate Bone Regeneration. Processes. 2020;8(10):1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101249
111. Goyanes A, Buanz ABM, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Fused-filament 3D printing (3DP) for fabrication of tablets. Int J Pharm. 2014;476(1-2):88-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.044
112. Weisman JA, Ballard DH, Jammalamadaka U, et al. 3D Printed Antibiotic and Chemotherapeutic Eluting Catheters for Potential Use in Interventional Radiology: In Vitro Proof of Concept Study. Acad Radiol. 2019;26(2):270-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.022
113. Wen H, He B, Wang H, et al. Structure-Based Gastro-Retentive and Controlled-Release Drug Delivery with Novel 3D Printing. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019;20(2):68. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-1237-3
114. Gioumouxouzis CI, Baklavaridis A, Katsamenis OL, et al. A 3D printed bilayer oral solid dosage form combining metformin for prolonged and glimepiride for immediate drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;120:40-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2018.04.020
115. Martinez PR, Goyanes A, Basit AW, Gaisford S. Fabrication of drug-loaded hydrogels with stereolithographic 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2017;532(1):313-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.003
116. Ehtezazi T, Algellay M, Islam Y, Roberts M, Dempster NM, Sarker SD. The Application of 3D Printing in the Formulation of Multilayered Fast Dissolving Oral Films. J Pharm Sci. 2018;107(4):1076-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2017.11.019
117. Scoutaris N, Ross SA, Douroumis D. 3D Printed “Starmix” Drug Loaded Dosage Forms for Paediatric Applications. Pharm Res. 2018;35(2):34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2284-2
118. Holländer J, Genina N, Jukarainen H, et al. Three-Dimensional Printed PCL-Based Implantable Prototypes of Medical Devices for Controlled Drug Delivery. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(9):2665-2676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2015.12.012
119. Genina N, Holländer J, Jukarainen H, Mäkilä E, Salonen J, Sandler N. Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) as a new drug carrier for 3D printed medical drug delivery devices. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;90:53-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2015.11.005
120. Genina N, Boetker JP, Colombo S, Harmankaya N, Rantanen J, Bohr A. Anti-tuberculosis drug combination for controlled oral delivery using 3D printed compartmental dosage forms: From drug product design to in vivo testing. J Control Release. 2017;268:40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.10.003
121. Smith D, Kapoor Y, Hermans A, et al. 3D printed capsules for quantitative regional absorption studies in the GI tract. Int J Pharm. 2018;550(1-2):418-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.055
122. Huang W, Zheng Q, Sun W, Xu H, Yang X. Levofloxacin implants with predefined microstructure fabricated by three-dimensional printing technique. Int J Pharm. 2007;339(1-2):33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.02.021
123. García-Alvarez R, Izquierdo-Barba I, Vallet-Regí M. 3D scaffold with effective multidrug sequential release against bacteria biofilm. Acta Biomater. 2017;49:113-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.028
124. Ibrahim M, Barnes M, McMillin R, et al. 3D Printing of Metformin HCl PVA Tablets by Fused Deposition Modeling: Drug Loading, Tablet Design, and Dissolution Studies. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019;20(5):195. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1400-5
125. Smith DM, Kapoor Y, Klinzing GR, Procopio AT. Pharmaceutical 3D printing: Design and qualification of a single step print and fill capsule. Int J Pharm. 2018;544(1):21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.056
126. Huanbutta K, Sangnim T. Design and development of zero-order drug release gastroretentive floating tablets fabricated by 3D printing technology. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2019;52:831-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.06.004
127. Water JJ, Bohr A, Boetker J, et al. Three-dimensional printing of drug-eluting implants: preparation of an antimicrobial polylactide feedstock material. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(3):1099-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24305
128. Gbureck U, Vorndran E, Müller FA, Barralet JE. Low temperature direct 3D printed bioceramics and biocomposites as drug release matrices. J Control Release. 2007;122(2):173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.06.022
129. Zhang J, Yang W, Vo AQ, et al. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based controlled release dosage by melt extrusion and 3D printing: Structure and drug release correlation. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;177:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.058
130. Zhang J, Feng X, Patil H, Tiwari RV, Repka MA. Coupling 3D printing with hot-melt extrusion to produce controlled-release tablets. Int J Pharm. 2017;519(1-2):186-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.12.049
131. Goyanes A, Fina F, Martorana A, Sedough D, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Development of modified release 3D printed tablets (printlets) with pharmaceutical excipients using additive manufacturing. Int J Pharm. 2017;527(1-2):21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.021
132. Fina F, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing of medicines. Int J Pharm. 2017;529(1-2):285-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.082
133. Holländer J, Hakala R, Suominen J, Moritz N, Yliruusi J, Sandler N. 3D printed UV light cured polydimethylsiloxane devices for drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2018;544(2):433-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.016
134. Long J, Nand AV, Ray S, et al. Development of customised 3D printed biodegradable projectile for administrating extended-release contraceptive to wildlife. Int J Pharm. 2018;548(1):349-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.002
135. Vakili H, Nyman JO, Genina N, Preis M, Sandler N. Application of a colorimetric technique in quality control for printed pediatric orodispersible drug delivery systems containing propranolol hydrochloride. Int J Pharm. 2016;511(1):606-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.07.032
136. Genina N, Janßen EM, Breitenbach A, Breitkreutz J, Sandler N. Evaluation of different substrates for inkjet printing of rasagiline mesylate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;85(3 Pt B):1075-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.03.017
137. Wu G, Huang F, Huang Y, et al. Bone inductivity comparison of control versus non-control released rhBMP2 coatings in 3D printed hydroxyapatite scaffold. J Biomater Appl. 2020;34(9):1254-1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220903962
138. Fu J, Yin H, Yu X, et al. Combination of 3D printing technologies and compressed tablets for preparation of riboflavin floating tablet-in-device (TiD) systems. Int J Pharm. 2018;549(1-2):370-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.011
139. Bom S, Santos C, Barros R, et al. Effects of Starch Incorporation on the Physicochemical Properties and Release Kinetics of Alginate-Based 3D Hydrogel Patches for Topical Delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(8):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12080719
140. Cheng Y, Qin H, Acevedo NC, Jiang X, Shi X. 3D printing of extended-release tablets of theophylline using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) hydrogels. Int J Pharm. 2020;591:119983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119983
141. Sergeeva NS, Sviridova IK, Komlev VS, et al. 3D printed constructs with antibacterial or antitumor activity for surgical treatment of bone defects in cancer patients. AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2017, p. 020063. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001642
142. Arafat B, Qinna N, Cieszynska M, Forbes RT, Alhnan MA. Tailored on demand anti-coagulant dosing: An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of 3D printed purpose-designed oral dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;128:282-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.04.010

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Journal Section

Review Article

Authors

Berna Kaval ^*
0000-0002-0746-7055
Türkiye

Engin Kapkın
0000-0002-4143-568X
Türkiye

Mustafa Sinan Kaynak
0000-0003-2917-2407
Türkiye

Publication Date

November 10, 2022

Submission Date

September 28, 2022

Acceptance Date

October 21, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 1 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.55971/EJLS.1181158

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97SH87LK

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kaval, B., Kapkın, E., & Kaynak, M. S. (2022). Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview. European Journal of Life Sciences, 1(2), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.55971/EJLS.1181158

AMA

1.Kaval B, Kapkın E, Kaynak MS. Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview. Eur J Life Sci. 2022;1(2):70-88. doi:10.55971/EJLS.1181158

Chicago

Kaval, Berna, Engin Kapkın, and Mustafa Sinan Kaynak. 2022. “Release Kinetics of 3D Printed Oral Solid Dosage Forms: An Overview”. European Journal of Life Sciences 1 (2): 70-88. https://doi.org/10.55971/EJLS.1181158.

EndNote

Kaval B, Kapkın E, Kaynak MS (November 1, 2022) Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview. European Journal of Life Sciences 1 2 70–88.

IEEE

[1]B. Kaval, E. Kapkın, and M. S. Kaynak, “Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview”, Eur J Life Sci, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–88, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.55971/EJLS.1181158.

ISNAD

Kaval, Berna - Kapkın, Engin - Kaynak, Mustafa Sinan. “Release Kinetics of 3D Printed Oral Solid Dosage Forms: An Overview”. European Journal of Life Sciences 1/2 (November 1, 2022): 70-88. https://doi.org/10.55971/EJLS.1181158.

JAMA

1.Kaval B, Kapkın E, Kaynak MS. Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview. Eur J Life Sci. 2022;1:70–88.

MLA

Kaval, Berna, et al. “Release Kinetics of 3D Printed Oral Solid Dosage Forms: An Overview”. European Journal of Life Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, Nov. 2022, pp. 70-88, doi:10.55971/EJLS.1181158.

Vancouver

1.Berna Kaval, Engin Kapkın, Mustafa Sinan Kaynak. Release kinetics of 3D printed oral solid dosage forms: An overview. Eur J Life Sci. 2022 Nov. 1;1(2):70-88. doi:10.55971/EJLS.1181158