Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The effects CaO nanoparticles applications on Onobrycis sativa seedlings growth under mannitol stress

Year 2022, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 6 - 10, 01.11.2022

Abstract

In our study, two Onobrycis sativa population (Uzuntekne, and Barış) were used as the material for the response to CaO -NPs
nanoparticulate. More DNSA and proline were collected in these two Onobrycis sativa genotypes than in control seedlings while
two genotypes were exposed to mannitol. Proline content highest at 150 mM mannitol and 1.5 ppm CaO while the minimum
and maximum content was observed at 50–150 mM mannitol dosages. The collected of DNSA was greatly correlated with
higher mannitol concentrations. Proline activities demonstrated an increasing trend against the increasing concentration of
mannitol. In conclusion, the growth characteristics and physiological responses of Onobrycis sativa increased, depending on
genotype, mannitol and CaO dosage in the media and their interactions.

References

  • 1. Zafer C. Nanotechnology, Socıety And Natıonal Securıty. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi 2021;1:193-216.
  • 2. Shang Y, Hasan MDK, Ahammed GJ, Li M, Yin H, Zhou J. Applications of Nanotechnology in Plant Growth and Crop Protection: A Review. Molecules 2019;24:2558.
  • 3. Iavicolia I, Lesoa V, Beezholdb DH, Shvedova AA.Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2017;15;329:96–111.
  • 4.Yazıcılar B, Böke F, Alaylı A, Nadaroglu H, Gedikli S, Bezirganoglu I. In vitro efects of CaO nanoparticles on Triticale callus exposed to short and long term salt stress. Plant Cell Reports 2021;40:29-42.
  • 5. Bezirganoglu I. Response of five triticale genotypes to salt stress in in vitro culture. Turk J Agric For 2017;41:372-380.
  • 6.Khalifa SAM, Elshafiey EH, Shetaia AA, El-Wahed AAA, Algethami AF, Musharraf SG et al. Overview of Bee Pollination and Its Economic Value for Crop Production. Insects 2021;12:688.
  • 7. Tan M, Sancak C. Korunga (Onobrychisviciifolia Scop.)". İçinde: Avcıoğlu, R., Hatipoğlu, R.& Karadağ, Y (Ed.), Yem. (Baklagil Yem) Bitkileri Cilt II) (s. 3337). Tarım ve Köyişleri bakanlık, Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü, 2009, İzmir.
  • 8.Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia plantarum1962;15:473-497.
  • 9.Watanabe S, Kojima K, Ide Y, Sasaki S. Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2000;63: 199–206.
  • 10. Bates L, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water stressstudies. Plant Soil 1973;39:205-207.
  • 11. Manishankar P, Wang N, Köster P, Alatar AA, Kudla J. Calcium signaling during salt stress and in the regulation of ion homeostasis. J Exp Bot 2018; 69;17:4215–4226.
  • 12. Seifikalhor M, Aliniaeifard S, Shomali A, Azad N, Hassani B, Lastochkinad O, Li T. Calcium signaling and salt tolerance are diversely entwined in plant. Plant Sıgnal Behav 2019;14;11:15.
  • 13. Hussain HA, Hussain S, Khaliq A, Ashraf U, Anjum SH, Men S, Wang L. Chilling and Drought Stresses in Crop Plants: Implications, Cross Talk, and Potential Management Opportunities. In plant science 2018;9:393.
  • 14. Dar, M. I., Naikoo, M. I., Rehman, F., Naushin, F., & Khan, F. A. (2016). Proline accumulation in plants: roles in stress tolerance and plant development. In Osmolytes and plants acclimation to changing environment: emerging omics technologies Springer, New Delhi 2016:155-166.
  • 15. Nayyar H. Accumulation of osmolytes and osmotic adjustment in waterstressed wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) as affected by calcium and its antagonists. Environ Exp Bot 2003;50:253-264.
  • 16. Soheilikhah Z, Karimi N, Ghasmpour HR, Zebarjadi AR. Effects of saline and mannitol induced stress on some biochemical and physiological parameters of Carthamus tinctorius L. varieties callus cultures. Aust J Crop Sci 2013;7(12):1866-1874.
  • 17. Singh D, Kumar A. In Vitro Screening and Characterization of Selected Elite Clones of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. for Salt Stress. J Plant Growth Regul 2020;40;2:694-7.
Year 2022, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 6 - 10, 01.11.2022

Abstract

References

  • 1. Zafer C. Nanotechnology, Socıety And Natıonal Securıty. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi 2021;1:193-216.
  • 2. Shang Y, Hasan MDK, Ahammed GJ, Li M, Yin H, Zhou J. Applications of Nanotechnology in Plant Growth and Crop Protection: A Review. Molecules 2019;24:2558.
  • 3. Iavicolia I, Lesoa V, Beezholdb DH, Shvedova AA.Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2017;15;329:96–111.
  • 4.Yazıcılar B, Böke F, Alaylı A, Nadaroglu H, Gedikli S, Bezirganoglu I. In vitro efects of CaO nanoparticles on Triticale callus exposed to short and long term salt stress. Plant Cell Reports 2021;40:29-42.
  • 5. Bezirganoglu I. Response of five triticale genotypes to salt stress in in vitro culture. Turk J Agric For 2017;41:372-380.
  • 6.Khalifa SAM, Elshafiey EH, Shetaia AA, El-Wahed AAA, Algethami AF, Musharraf SG et al. Overview of Bee Pollination and Its Economic Value for Crop Production. Insects 2021;12:688.
  • 7. Tan M, Sancak C. Korunga (Onobrychisviciifolia Scop.)". İçinde: Avcıoğlu, R., Hatipoğlu, R.& Karadağ, Y (Ed.), Yem. (Baklagil Yem) Bitkileri Cilt II) (s. 3337). Tarım ve Köyişleri bakanlık, Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü, 2009, İzmir.
  • 8.Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia plantarum1962;15:473-497.
  • 9.Watanabe S, Kojima K, Ide Y, Sasaki S. Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2000;63: 199–206.
  • 10. Bates L, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water stressstudies. Plant Soil 1973;39:205-207.
  • 11. Manishankar P, Wang N, Köster P, Alatar AA, Kudla J. Calcium signaling during salt stress and in the regulation of ion homeostasis. J Exp Bot 2018; 69;17:4215–4226.
  • 12. Seifikalhor M, Aliniaeifard S, Shomali A, Azad N, Hassani B, Lastochkinad O, Li T. Calcium signaling and salt tolerance are diversely entwined in plant. Plant Sıgnal Behav 2019;14;11:15.
  • 13. Hussain HA, Hussain S, Khaliq A, Ashraf U, Anjum SH, Men S, Wang L. Chilling and Drought Stresses in Crop Plants: Implications, Cross Talk, and Potential Management Opportunities. In plant science 2018;9:393.
  • 14. Dar, M. I., Naikoo, M. I., Rehman, F., Naushin, F., & Khan, F. A. (2016). Proline accumulation in plants: roles in stress tolerance and plant development. In Osmolytes and plants acclimation to changing environment: emerging omics technologies Springer, New Delhi 2016:155-166.
  • 15. Nayyar H. Accumulation of osmolytes and osmotic adjustment in waterstressed wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) as affected by calcium and its antagonists. Environ Exp Bot 2003;50:253-264.
  • 16. Soheilikhah Z, Karimi N, Ghasmpour HR, Zebarjadi AR. Effects of saline and mannitol induced stress on some biochemical and physiological parameters of Carthamus tinctorius L. varieties callus cultures. Aust J Crop Sci 2013;7(12):1866-1874.
  • 17. Singh D, Kumar A. In Vitro Screening and Characterization of Selected Elite Clones of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. for Salt Stress. J Plant Growth Regul 2020;40;2:694-7.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Microbiology
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Büşra Yazıcılar This is me 0000-0003-2465-7579

Ümmü Gülsüm Koç This is me

Publication Date November 1, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 1 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yazıcılar, B., & Koç, Ü. G. (2022). The effects CaO nanoparticles applications on Onobrycis sativa seedlings growth under mannitol stress. Eurasian Journal of Molecular and Biochemical Sciences, 1(2), 6-10.