Publication Dynamics and Collaboration Networks in Prenatal Care Research: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis (2020–2024)

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 239 - 247, 31.12.2025

Nilüfer Tuğut , İrem Ağtaş

https://izlik.org/JA34FM36AW

Abstract

This study aimed to determine global publication trends and research focuses in the field of prenatal care (PNC) through bibliometric and visualization analyses, while also revealing the contribution of PNC research to nursing science and identifying developmental directions within the field. Articles published between 2020 and 2024 in the Scopus database were screened using keywords related to prenatal care, including only English-language nursing publications; a total of 1,919 articles across 275 journals met these criteria, and data were analyzed through bibliometric methods using R software and the Biblioshiny interface of the Bibliometrix package. Although annual publication numbers fluctuated, an upward trend was observed between 2020 and 2024, with the average number of citations per article calculated as 6.56 and the international co-authorship rate at 21.63%. The core keywords identified were woman, pregnancy, and prenatal care, while emerging research trends focused on psychosocial support and maternal care; the most productive institutions were the University of São Paulo, Haramaya University, and the University of Gondar, and the leading countries were the USA, Brazil, and Ethiopia, with Türkiye ranking 18th in publication productivity. International collaboration networks remained limited and predominantly centered around the USA. The findings indicate that research on PNC has expanded globally; however, disparities in international collaboration and geographical representation persist, and Türkiye’s 18th-place ranking reflects a moderate contribution to global PNC literature while highlighting the need to strengthen partnerships. Diversifying national studies to include both clinical and psychosocial aspects may enhance the visibility and scientific impact of Turkish nursing research, and the literature emphasizes the importance of holistic monitoring of maternal and infant health and integration of psychosocial support into nursing science. This study analyzes global research trends in the field of prenatal care through a comprehensive and systematic approach, thereby providing a significant contribution to the nursing-based bibliometric studies that are relatively underrepresented in the literature. Future efforts should focus on promoting international cooperation, expanding research on psychosocial support and technology use, and integrating these areas into nursing education.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis , Pregnancy , Prenatal care , Nursing , Women

References

• Bal, Z., Gökbulut, N., & Uçar, T. (2022). Doğum öncesi bakım memnuniyetinin doğum memnuniyetiyle ilişkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 10(2), 798-808. https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.1091966
• Buultjens, M., Farouque, A., Karimi, L., Whitby, L., Milgrom, J., & Erbas, B. (2021). The contribution of group prenatal care to maternal psychological health outcomes: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 34(6), e631–e642.
• Bülez, A., Karataş Okyay, E., Sever, E., Bolat, A., & Kürklü, A. (2023). Göçmen olan ve olmayan kadınlarda doğum öncesi bakım memnuniyetinin travmatik doğum algısına etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.1348441
• Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., & Pamučar, D. (2024a). Sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making: A state-of-the-art research perspective using bibliometric analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121660
• Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., Zakeri, S., & Pamucar, D. (2024b). Mapping the evolution of multi-attributive border approximation area comparison method: A bibliometric analysis. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7120241037
• Evgin, H., & Oskay, Ü. (2022). Göçmen kadınlarda perinatal bakım almayı etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi: Bir sistematik derleme. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.964811
• Haddad, S. M., Souza, R. T., & Cecatti, J. G. (2019). Mobile technology in health (mhealth) and antenatal care—Searching for apps and available solutions: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 127, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.008
• Karabulutlu, Ö., & Akdemir, G. (2021). 15-49 yaş grubundaki kadınların doğum öncesi bakım alma sıklığı ve etkileyen faktörleri belirleme, verilen hizmetin uygunluğunu değerlendirme. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(4), 520-530. https://doi.org/10.17049/ataunihem.767194
• Kılıç, S., Uçar, M., Temir, P., Erten, Ü., Şahin, E., Karaca, B., ... & Özkır, F. (2007). Hamile kadınlarda doğum öncesi bakım alma sıklığı ve bunu etkileyen faktörler. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 6(2), 91-97.
• Mizrak Sahin, B., & Kabakci, E. N. (2021). The experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Türkiye: A qualitative study. Women and Birth, 34(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.022
• Monk, C., Dimidjian, S., Galinsky, E., Gregory, K. D., Hoffman, M. C., Howell, E. A., ... & D'Alton, M. E. (2022). The transition to parenthood in obstetrics: Enhancing prenatal care for 2-generation impact. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 4(5), 100678.
• Muglia, L. J., Tong, S., Ozanne, S., & Benhalima, K. (2022). Maternal factors during pregnancy influencing maternal, fetal, and childhood outcomes: Meet the Guest Editors. BMC Medicine, 20(114), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02294-4
• Nazik, F., Doğan Yüksekol, Ö., Baltacı, N., & Ulucan, M. (2022). Pregnant women receiving prenatal care and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. J TOGU Health Sci, 2(2), 111-122.
• Polavarapu, M., Singh, S., Arsene, C., & Stanton, R. (2024). Inequities in adequacy of prenatal care and shifts in rural/urban differences early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Women's Health Issues, 34(6), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2024.08.003
• Shmerling, A., Hoss, M., Malam, N., Staton, E. W., & Lyon, C. (2022). Prenatal care via telehealth. Primary Care, 49(4), 609.
• Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması. (2018). Anne sağlığı ve bakımı. http://www.sck.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 15.12.2024)
• Ünlü, G., & Güngör Satılmış, İ. (2020). Antenatal dönemde mobil sağlık hizmetleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 8(3), 919-932. https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.748647
• World Health Organization. (2018). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: Summary. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259947/WHO-RHR-18.02-eng.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 15.12.2024)
• Wu, K. K., Phillippi, J., Mueller, M., Lopez, C., & Nichols, M. (2024). Telemedicine for routine prenatal care: Use and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 69(4), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13621