High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy

Ali Abed Mohammed; Abdulhussein Kareem Jwery; Mohammed Radef Dawood

doi:10.5152/ejra.2024.24154

High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and adverse effects of high-intensity-focused ultrasound compared to diode laser turbinoplasty techniques. Hypertrophy of the inferior nasal turbinate is the most frequent cause of nasal obstruction, causing considerable impacts on patients’ quality of life, and the type of surgical technique relies on effectiveness of the procedure, in addition to safety with fewer adverse effect. Methods: A comparative study with 74 adult patients, complaining of nasal obstruction due to bilateral inferior hypertrophy, were eventually and randomly divided into 2 groups: group (A) consisted of 37 patients, treated with high intensity-focused-ultrasound turbinoplasty, and group (B) consisted of 37 patients, treated using the diode laser technique. Clinical parameters, such as postoperative pain score, intra- and postoperative bleeding, postoperative crusting and synechiae, and healing rapidity process, were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Mean pain score was significantly higher in group (B) in comparison with group (A), P-value (.001) on the second postoperative day, and P-value (.0001) on the third, fourth, and fifth postoperative days. Mean intraoperative bleeding score was higher in group (B) (2.9 ± 0.7), compared to group (A) (1.3 ± 0.5), with P-value (.0001). However, there was no significant difference between group (A) and (B) regarding bleeding postoperatively, P-value (.521). Mean rapidity of healing process and crustation formation were higher in group (B) than in group (A), with P-values (.001 and .0023) respectively. No synechiae (0%) was observed in either group during 3- month follow-up. Conclusion: High-intensity-focused ultrasound turbinoplasty was associated with fewer adverse effects compared to diode laser technique.

Keywords

References

Ravichandran SP, Ramasamy K, Parida PK, Alexander A, Ganesan S, Saxena SK. Comparison of efficacy of potassium titanyl phosphate laser & diode laser in the management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(6):578-584
Kankaanpää A, Harju T, Numminen J. The effect of inferior turbinate surgery on quality of life: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(10_suppl):1107S-1112S.
Ye T, Zhou B. Update on surgical management of adult inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23(1):29-33.
Hol MKS, Huizing EH. Treatment of inferior turbinate pathology: a review and critical evaluation of the different techniques. Rhinology. 2000;38:157-166.
Kisser U, Stelter K, Gürkov R, et al. Diode laser versus radiofrequency treatment of the inferior turbinate - a randomized clinical trial. Rhinology. 2014;52(4):424-430.
Sapçi T, Sahin B, Karavus A, Akbulut UG. Comparison of the effects of radiofrequency tissue ablation, CO2 ablation, and partial turbinectomy application on nasal mucociliary functions. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(3):514-519.
Mohammed AA. The benefit of middle turbinate stabilization during functional endoscopic sinus surgery, A comparative study. Mustansiriya Medical Journal. 2022;21(2):160-163.
Doreyawar V, Gadag RP, Manjunath DN, Javali SB, Maradi N, Shetty D. Inferior turbinate reduction: diode laser or conventional partial turbinectomy? Ear Nose Throat J. 2018;97(1-2):E15-E19.

Kennedy JE, Ter Haar GR, Cranston D. High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Br J Radiol. 2003;76(909):590-599.
Kim JK, Cho SW, Kim H, et al. Development of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;15(2):160-167.
Lipan MJ, Most SP. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(5):358-361.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(1):17-24.
Chaaban MR, Baroody FM, Gottlieb O, Naclerio RM. Blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery with propofol or sevoflurane: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(5):510-514.
Abdullah B, Singh S. Surgical interventions for inferior turbinate hypertrophy: A comprehensive review of current techniques and technologies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3441.
Smith DH, Daines BS, Cazzaniga J, Bhandarkar ND. Surgical management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy in the era of widespread communicable disease. Cureus. 2023; 15(1): e34280.
Nurse LA, Duncavage JA. Surgery of the inferior and middle turbinates. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(2):295-309.
Brunworth J, Holmes J, Sindwani R. Inferior turbinate hypertrophy: review and graduated approach to surgical management. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):411-415.
Gindros G, Kantas I, Balatsouras DG, Kaidoglou A, Kandiloros D. Comparison of ultrasound turbinate reduction, radiofrequency tissue ablation and submucosal cauterization in inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(11):1727-1733.
Greywoode JD, Van Abel K, Pribitkin EA. Ultrasonic bone aspirator turbinoplasty: a novel approach for management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(suppl 4):S239.
Al-Hilali AMS, Khalaf AQ, Yaseen ET. The Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating nasal obstruction caused by inferior turbinate hypertrophy: A clinical study. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e58348.
Mohamed NN, Khamis WMBA, Abdelbary EH, Alkabeer TY. Diode laser-assisted inferior turbinoplasty in resistant cases of allergic rhinitis: a clinical and histo-pathological study. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(3):2053-2061.
Venkatesh D, Raveendra P, Gadag MD, et al. Inferior turbinate reduction: diode laser or conventional partial turbinectomy? Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(2):125-130.
Isaac A, Major M, Witmans M, et al. Correlations between acoustic rhinometry, subjective symptoms, and endoscopic findings in symptomatic children with nasal obstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(6):550-555.
Almulla E, Alshammari D, Alshaikh R, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of diode laser turbinoplasty on nasal obstruction estimated with rhinomanometry. IJOHNS. 2021;10(6):487-496.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Otorhinolaryngology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ali Abed Mohammed This is me
Iraq

Abdulhussein Kareem Jwery This is me
0000-0002-6776-8212
Iraq

Mohammed Radef Dawood This is me
0000-0002-2991-8056
Iraq

Publication Date

December 10, 2024

Submission Date

September 3, 2024

Acceptance Date

October 7, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 7 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2024.24154

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33FZ48CA

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Mohammed, A. A., Jwery, A. K., & Dawood, M. R. (2024). High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 7(3), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2024.24154

AMA

1.Mohammed AA, Jwery AK, Dawood MR. High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2024;7(3):89-94. doi:10.5152/ejra.2024.24154

Chicago

Mohammed, Ali Abed, Abdulhussein Kareem Jwery, and Mohammed Radef Dawood. 2024. “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 7 (3): 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.

EndNote

Mohammed AA, Jwery AK, Dawood MR (December 1, 2024) High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 7 3 89–94.

IEEE

[1]A. A. Mohammed, A. K. Jwery, and M. R. Dawood, “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 89–94, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.

ISNAD

Mohammed, Ali Abed - Jwery, Abdulhussein Kareem - Dawood, Mohammed Radef. “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 7/3 (December 1, 2024): 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.

JAMA

1.Mohammed AA, Jwery AK, Dawood MR. High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2024;7:89–94.

MLA

Mohammed, Ali Abed, et al. “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 7, no. 3, Dec. 2024, pp. 89-94, doi:10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.

Vancouver

1.Ali Abed Mohammed, Abdulhussein Kareem Jwery, Mohammed Radef Dawood. High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2024 Dec. 1;7(3):89-94. doi:10.5152/ejra.2024.24154