Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 89 - 94, 10.12.2024

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and adverse effects of high-intensity-focused ultrasound compared to diode laser
turbinoplasty techniques. Hypertrophy of the inferior nasal turbinate is the most frequent cause of nasal obstruction,
causing considerable impacts on patients’ quality of life, and the type of surgical technique relies on effectiveness of
the procedure, in addition to safety with fewer adverse effect.

Methods: A comparative study with 74 adult patients, complaining of nasal obstruction due to bilateral inferior
hypertrophy, were eventually and randomly divided into 2 groups: group (A) consisted of 37 patients, treated with
high intensity-focused-ultrasound turbinoplasty, and group (B) consisted of 37 patients, treated using the diode laser
technique. Clinical parameters, such as postoperative pain score, intra- and postoperative bleeding, postoperative
crusting and synechiae, and healing rapidity process, were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Mean pain score was significantly higher in group (B) in comparison with group (A), P-value (.001) on the
second postoperative day, and P-value (.0001) on the third, fourth, and fifth postoperative days. Mean intraoperative
bleeding score was higher in group (B) (2.9 ± 0.7), compared to group (A) (1.3 ± 0.5), with P-value (.0001). However,
there was no significant difference between group (A) and (B) regarding bleeding postoperatively, P-value (.521).
Mean rapidity of healing process and crustation formation were higher in group (B) than in group (A), with P-values
(.001 and .0023) respectively. No synechiae (0%) was observed in either group during 3- month follow-up.

Conclusion: High-intensity-focused ultrasound turbinoplasty was associated with fewer adverse effects compared
to diode laser technique.

References

  • Ravichandran SP, Ramasamy K, Parida PK, Alexander A, Ganesan S, Saxena SK. Comparison of efficacy of potassium titanyl phosphate laser & diode laser in the management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(6):578-584
  • Kankaanpää A, Harju T, Numminen J. The effect of inferior turbinate surgery on quality of life: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(10_suppl):1107S-1112S.
  • Ye T, Zhou B. Update on surgical management of adult inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23(1):29-33.
  • Hol MKS, Huizing EH. Treatment of inferior turbinate pathology: a review and critical evaluation of the different techniques. Rhinology. 2000;38:157-166.
  • Kisser U, Stelter K, Gürkov R, et al. Diode laser versus radiofrequency treatment of the inferior turbinate - a randomized clinical trial. Rhinology. 2014;52(4):424-430.
  • Sapçi T, Sahin B, Karavus A, Akbulut UG. Comparison of the effects of radiofrequency tissue ablation, CO2 ablation, and partial turbinectomy application on nasal mucociliary functions. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(3):514-519.
  • Mohammed AA. The benefit of middle turbinate stabilization during functional endoscopic sinus surgery, A comparative study. Mustansiriya Medical Journal. 2022;21(2):160-163.
  • Doreyawar V, Gadag RP, Manjunath DN, Javali SB, Maradi N, Shetty D. Inferior turbinate reduction: diode laser or conventional partial turbinectomy? Ear Nose Throat J. 2018;97(1-2):E15-E19.
  • Kennedy JE, Ter Haar GR, Cranston D. High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Br J Radiol. 2003;76(909):590-599.
  • Kim JK, Cho SW, Kim H, et al. Development of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;15(2):160-167.
  • Lipan MJ, Most SP. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(5):358-361.
  • Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(1):17-24.
  • Chaaban MR, Baroody FM, Gottlieb O, Naclerio RM. Blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery with propofol or sevoflurane: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(5):510-514.
  • Abdullah B, Singh S. Surgical interventions for inferior turbinate hypertrophy: A comprehensive review of current techniques and technologies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3441.
  • Smith DH, Daines BS, Cazzaniga J, Bhandarkar ND. Surgical management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy in the era of widespread communicable disease. Cureus. 2023; 15(1): e34280.
  • Nurse LA, Duncavage JA. Surgery of the inferior and middle turbinates. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(2):295-309.
  • Brunworth J, Holmes J, Sindwani R. Inferior turbinate hypertrophy: review and graduated approach to surgical management. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):411-415.
  • Gindros G, Kantas I, Balatsouras DG, Kaidoglou A, Kandiloros D. Comparison of ultrasound turbinate reduction, radiofrequency tissue ablation and submucosal cauterization in inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(11):1727-1733.
  • Greywoode JD, Van Abel K, Pribitkin EA. Ultrasonic bone aspirator turbinoplasty: a novel approach for management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(suppl 4):S239.
  • Al-Hilali AMS, Khalaf AQ, Yaseen ET. The Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating nasal obstruction caused by inferior turbinate hypertrophy: A clinical study. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e58348.
  • Mohamed NN, Khamis WMBA, Abdelbary EH, Alkabeer TY. Diode laser-assisted inferior turbinoplasty in resistant cases of allergic rhinitis: a clinical and histo-pathological study. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(3):2053-2061.
  • Venkatesh D, Raveendra P, Gadag MD, et al. Inferior turbinate reduction: diode laser or conventional partial turbinectomy? Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(2):125-130.
  • Isaac A, Major M, Witmans M, et al. Correlations between acoustic rhinometry, subjective symptoms, and endoscopic findings in symptomatic children with nasal obstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(6):550-555.
  • Almulla E, Alshammari D, Alshaikh R, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of diode laser turbinoplasty on nasal obstruction estimated with rhinomanometry. IJOHNS. 2021;10(6):487-496.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Otorhinolaryngology
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ali Abed Mohammed This is me

Abdulhussein Kareem Jwery This is me 0000-0002-6776-8212

Mohammed Radef Dawood This is me 0000-0002-2991-8056

Submission Date September 3, 2024
Acceptance Date October 7, 2024
Publication Date December 10, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Mohammed, A. A., Jwery, A. K., & Dawood, M. R. (2024). High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 7(3), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2024.24154
AMA Mohammed AA, Jwery AK, Dawood MR. High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. December 2024;7(3):89-94. doi:10.5152/ejra.2024.24154
Chicago Mohammed, Ali Abed, Abdulhussein Kareem Jwery, and Mohammed Radef Dawood. “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 7, no. 3 (December 2024): 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.
EndNote Mohammed AA, Jwery AK, Dawood MR (December 1, 2024) High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 7 3 89–94.
IEEE A. A. Mohammed, A. K. Jwery, and M. R. Dawood, “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 89–94, 2024, doi: 10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.
ISNAD Mohammed, Ali Abed et al. “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 7/3 (December2024), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.
JAMA Mohammed AA, Jwery AK, Dawood MR. High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2024;7:89–94.
MLA Mohammed, Ali Abed et al. “High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 7, no. 3, 2024, pp. 89-94, doi:10.5152/ejra.2024.24154.
Vancouver Mohammed AA, Jwery AK, Dawood MR. High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound Versus Diode Laser for Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2024;7(3):89-94.

You can find the current version of the Instructions to Authors at: https://www.eurjrhinol.org/en/instructions-to-authors-104

Starting on 2020, all content published in the journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 International
License which allows third parties to use the content for non-commercial purposes as long as they give credit to the original work. This license
allows for the content to be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes, promoting the dissemination and use of the research published in
the journal.
The content published before 2020 was licensed under a traditional copyright, but the archive is still available for free access.