Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 48 - 52, 30.08.2021
https://izlik.org/JA32RZ86CX

Abstract

Objective: Rhinology procedures are increasingly performed as day cases worldwide as well as in our department. Our aim was to identify if our rhinology patients fulfill the day case criteria and to audit our postoperative complications.

Material and Methods: A retrospective review of all septo/rhinoplasties and septal perforation repair for the last 3 years was performed. Overnight admission rate, medical and surgical complications were recorded.

Results: Out of the 103 patients, only one (0.97%) needed overnight admission. The reason was medical, sinus tachycardia in a young anxious patient. Two immediate postoperative complications were recorded, self-limited epistaxis and light headedness. A self-limited epistaxis occurred day 5 post-operatively. No action was required in any of these cases. Late post-operative complications were three septal perforations (2.9%).

Conclusions: Day case septo/rhinoplasties can be safely performed with a <1% overnight admission rate in well selected patients. Increasing numbers of day procedures should be the goal in all otorhinolaryngology areas.

References

  • Kerimian M, Bastier P-L, Re´ ville N, et al. Feasibility study of bilateral radical ethmoidectomy in ambulatory surger. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135(6):377-382.
  • Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: Demographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(3):635-638.
  • Marshall A. Ear nose and throat surgery. GIRFT Programme National Specialty Report. Available at https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ENT-Report-Nov19-M.pdf, accessed date August 2020.
  • Belleudy S, Kerimian M, Legrenzi P, et al Assessment of quality and safety in rhinologic day surgery. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020;S1879-7296(20):30159-30159.
  • de Gabory L, Sowerby LJ, DelGaudio JM, et al. International survey and consensus (ICON) on ambulatory surgery in rhinology. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135(1):S49-553.
  • Al-Hussaini A, Walijee H, Owens D. The uptake of day-case septoplasty in England and Wales; is there a relationship between day-case rates and waiting list times? Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98(5):212-215.
  • Comptroller and Auditor General Special Report. Managing elective day surgery. Special report 83. 2014. Available at https://www.audit.gov.ie/en/Find-Report/Publications/2014/Special-Report-83-Managing-Elective-Day-Surgery.pdf, accessed date August 2020.
  • Otolaryngology head and neck surgery—A model of care for Ireland. Available at http://www.iosconference.org/assets/files/2019/Launched%20ENT%20Model.pdf, accessed date August 2020.
  • de Gabory L, Serrano E, Lecanu J-B, et al. French otorhinolaryngology society guidelines for day-case nasal surgery. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2015;132(1):35-40.
  • Menezes AS, Guimara˜es JR, Breda M, et al. Septal and turbinate surgery: Is overnight essential? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:131-8.
  • Han JK, Stringer SP, Rosenfeld RM, et al. Clinical consensus statement: Septoplasty with or without inferior turbinate reduction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(5):708-720.
  • Karlsson TR, Shakeel M, Supriya M, et al. Septoplasty with concomitant inferior turbinate reduction reduces the need for revision procedure. Rhinology 2015;53(1):59-65.
  • De Oliveira GS, Holl JL, Lindquist LA, et al. Older adults and unanticipated hospital admission within 30 days of ambulatory surgery: An analysis of 53,667 ambulatory surgical procedures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(8):1679-1685.
  • Wong A, Kacker A. Incidence of unplanned admissions after sinonasal surgery: A 6-year review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(2):143-146.
  • Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, et al Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: Packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32(2):111-114.
  • Ramalingam V, Venkatesan R, Somasundaram S. A comparative study between septal quilting sutures without nasal packing and only nasal packing post-septal correction. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;72:169-174.
  • Gengler I, Carpentier L, Pasquesoone X, et al. Predictors of unanticipated admission within 30 days of outpatient sinonasal surgery. Rhinology 2017;55(3):274-80.
  • Georgalas C, Obholzer R, Martinez-Devesa P, et al. Day case septoplasty and unexpected re-admissions at a dedicated day-case unit: A 4-year audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:202-206.
  • Scott JR, Sowerby LJ, Rotenberg BW. Office-based rhinologic surgery: A modern experience with operative techniques under local anesthetic. Am J Rhinol Allery. 2017;31(2):135-138.
  • Chang MT, Jitaroon K, Nguyen T, et al. Hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing office-based sinus procedures under local anesthesia. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019;10(1):114-120.
  • Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(2):111-115.
  • Castelnuovo P, Ferreli F, Khodaei I, et al. Anterior ethmoidal artery septal flap for the management of septal perforation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13(6):411.
  • Da˛browska-Bien´ J, Skarz ˙yn ´ ski PH, Gwizdalska I, et al. Complications in septoplasty based on a large group of 5639 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(7):1789-1794.
  • Garzaro M, Dell’Era V, Riva G, et al. Endoscopic versus conventional septoplasty: Objective/subjective data on 276 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(6):1707-1711.
  • Kim SW, Rhee CS. Nasal septal perforation repair: Predictive factors and systematic review of the literature. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(1):58-65.
  • Setzen M, Svider PF, Pollock K. COVID-19 and rhinology: A look at the future. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(3).
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Otorhinolaryngology
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Andreea Nea This is me 0000-0001-6575-5656

Husam Alhuwaish This is me 0000-0002-1187-7292

Edlir Shytaj This is me 0000-0002-5437-2526

Publication Date August 30, 2021
DOI https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2021.21621
IZ https://izlik.org/JA32RZ86CX
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Nea, A., Alhuwaish, H., & Shytaj, E. (2021). Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 4(2), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2021.21621
AMA 1.Nea A, Alhuwaish H, Shytaj E. Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2021;4(2):48-52. doi:10.5152/ejra.2021.21621
Chicago Nea, Andreea, Husam Alhuwaish, and Edlir Shytaj. 2021. “Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 4 (2): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2021.21621.
EndNote Nea A, Alhuwaish H, Shytaj E (August 1, 2021) Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 4 2 48–52.
IEEE [1]A. Nea, H. Alhuwaish, and E. Shytaj, “Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 48–52, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.5152/ejra.2021.21621.
ISNAD Nea, Andreea - Alhuwaish, Husam - Shytaj, Edlir. “Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 4/2 (August 1, 2021): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2021.21621.
JAMA 1.Nea A, Alhuwaish H, Shytaj E. Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2021;4:48–52.
MLA Nea, Andreea, et al. “Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 4, no. 2, Aug. 2021, pp. 48-52, doi:10.5152/ejra.2021.21621.
Vancouver 1.Andreea Nea, Husam Alhuwaish, Edlir Shytaj. Day Case Septorhinoplasties-Our Experience. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Aug. 1;4(2):48-52. doi:10.5152/ejra.2021.21621

You can find the current version of the Instructions to Authors at: https://www.eurjrhinol.org/en/instructions-to-authors-104

Starting on 2020, all content published in the journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 International
License which allows third parties to use the content for non-commercial purposes as long as they give credit to the original work. This license
allows for the content to be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes, promoting the dissemination and use of the research published in
the journal.
The content published before 2020 was licensed under a traditional copyright, but the archive is still available for free access.