Research Article

Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging

Volume: 2 Number: 3 December 7, 2019

Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging

Abstract

Objective: Transnasal endoscopic surgical treatments of the maxillary sinus (MS) and nasolacrimal canal (NLC) pathologies are very common. A detailed understanding of the anatomy of this region preoperatively affects the chances of surgical success. Advances in paranasal sinus computed tomography (PNSCT) have yielded a better understanding of the surgical anatomy. Material and Methods: The anatomical relationships between the medial and anterior walls of MS and NLC involving 81 patients (41 males and 41 females) were analyzed by means of PNSCT sections. The anatomical relationship of NLC with the MS anterior wall was evaluated and classified into unified and separate types. The separate-type NLC was further classified as protruding or nonprotruding according to the localization of the medial wall of the MS. In addition, the vertical height of the lower meatus and long and short diameters of the NLC were measured. Results: The unified type was detected in 54 (32.9%) patients out of the total MSs of 164 patients. The distance between the anterior walls of the MS and NLC was 3.50 mm in females and 3.95 mm in males; this did not significantly differ between the genders. Further, 26 MSs were of the protruding type. The vertical height of the lower meatus was 10.75 mm in females and 12.15 mm in males. The long diameter of the NLC was 6.30 mm in women and 6.80 mm in men. The short diameter of the NLC was 4.85 mm in women and 5.00 mm in men. Conclusion: The relationship between the NLC and MS shows anatomical variations. Understanding these variations before surgery can increase the success rate of endoscopic surgical procedures directed toward the medial wall of MSs.

Keywords

References

  1. Wang X, Chen X, Zheng M, Liu C, Wang C, Zhang L. The relationships between the nasolacrimal duct and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 2019; 129: 1030-4.
  2. Park D Y, Choo O, Hong S, Kim H. Infratemporal fossa cellulitis caused by a remnant iatrogenic foreign body after a bimaxillary operation. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26: 196-7.
  3. Moriyama M, Kodama S, Hirano T, Suzuki M. Endoscopic-modified medial maxillectomy and its limitation for a solitary fibrous tumor of the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017; 44: 370-4.
  4. Küçük B, Yorulmaz İ. Nazal ve Paranazal Tümörlerin Medial Maksillektomi ile Rezeksiyonunda Nazolakrimal Sistemin Korunması. K.B.B. ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Derg 2000; 8: 28-32.
  5. Sieskiewicz A, Buczko K, Janica J, Lukasiewicz A, Lebkowska U, Piszczatowski B, et al. Minimally invasive medial maxillectomy and the position of nasolacrimal duct: the CT study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274: 1515-9.
  6. Navarro Pde L, Machado AJ Jr, Crespo AN. Assessment of the lacrimal recess of the maxillary sinus on computed tomography scans. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 802- 5.
  7. Meyers A, Hawes MJ. Nasolacrimal obstruction after inferior meatus nasal antrostomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 208-11.
  8. Ghosh A, Pal S, Srıvastava A, Saha S. Modification of endoscopic medial maxillectomy: a novel approach for inverted papilloma of the maxillary sinus. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129: 159-63

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Otorhinolaryngology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 7, 2019

Submission Date

October 1, 2019

Acceptance Date

November 29, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 2 Number: 3

APA
Akyüz, S., Yıldırım, F. N., Karaman, C. Z., & Başak, H. S. (2019). Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 2(3), 71-74. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2019.209
AMA
1.Akyüz S, Yıldırım FN, Karaman CZ, Başak HS. Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;2(3):71-74. doi:10.5152/ejra.2019.209
Chicago
Akyüz, Servet, Fatma Nur Yıldırım, Can Zafer Karaman, and Hatice Sema Başak. 2019. “Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 2 (3): 71-74. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2019.209.
EndNote
Akyüz S, Yıldırım FN, Karaman CZ, Başak HS (December 1, 2019) Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 2 3 71–74.
IEEE
[1]S. Akyüz, F. N. Yıldırım, C. Z. Karaman, and H. S. Başak, “Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 71–74, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.5152/ejra.2019.209.
ISNAD
Akyüz, Servet - Yıldırım, Fatma Nur - Karaman, Can Zafer - Başak, Hatice Sema. “Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 2/3 (December 1, 2019): 71-74. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2019.209.
JAMA
1.Akyüz S, Yıldırım FN, Karaman CZ, Başak HS. Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;2:71–74.
MLA
Akyüz, Servet, et al. “Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 2, no. 3, Dec. 2019, pp. 71-74, doi:10.5152/ejra.2019.209.
Vancouver
1.Servet Akyüz, Fatma Nur Yıldırım, Can Zafer Karaman, Hatice Sema Başak. Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2019 Dec. 1;2(3):71-4. doi:10.5152/ejra.2019.209

You can find the current version of the Instructions to Authors at: https://www.eurjrhinol.org/en/instructions-to-authors-104

Starting on 2020, all content published in the journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 International
License which allows third parties to use the content for non-commercial purposes as long as they give credit to the original work. This license
allows for the content to be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes, promoting the dissemination and use of the research published in
the journal.
The content published before 2020 was licensed under a traditional copyright, but the archive is still available for free access.