Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty

Erdal Rahman Koprucu; Abdülcemal Ümit Işık; Osman Bahadır; Selçuk Arslan; Hatice Bengü Yaldız Çobanoğlu

doi:10.65396/ejra.1825151

Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate the postoperative morbidity outcomes of conventional osteotomy and ultrasonic osteotomy with piezoelectric instruments. Methods: The study included 72 patients between 18 and 40 years of age. Osteotomy was performed in 49 patients with the conventional method and 23 patients with ultrasonic devices. All patients' ecchymosis, edema, and pain scores were recorded at the postoperative 8th hour and on the 1st, 3rd, and 10th days. Results: Edema and ecchymosis scores were found to be lower in the ultrasonic group compared to the conventional group on postoperative day 1. However, only the differences in the latter were statistically significant (p = 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the pain scores of both groups. Conclusion: We believe ultrasonic osteotomy may be more beneficial in terms of early edema and ecchymosis in studies with a large patient population and similar dorsal nasal flap elevation.

Keywords

References

1. Xu F, Zeng W, Mao X, Fan G-K. The efficacy of melilotus extract in the management of postoperative ecchymosis and edema after simultaneous rhinoplasty and blepharoplasty. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2008;32(4):599-603.
2. Yücel ÖT. Which type of osteotomy for edema and ecchymosis: external or internal? Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2005;55(6):587-90.
3. Thomas JR, Griner NR, Remmler DJ. Steps for a safer method of osteotomies in rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope. 1987;97(6):746-7.
4. Parkes ML, Kamer F, Morgan WR. Double lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Archives of Otolaryngology. 1977;103(6):344-8.
5. Kara CO, Gökalan I. Effects of single-dose steroid usage on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1999;104(7):2213-8.
6. Al-Arfaj A, Al-Qattan M, Al-Harethy S, Al-Zahrani K. Effect of periosteum elevation on periorbital ecchymosis in rhinoplasty. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2009;62(11):e538-e9.
7. Gun R, Yorgancılar E, Yıldırım M, Bakır S, Topcu I, Akkus Z. Effects of lidocaine and adrenaline combination on postoperative edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011;40(7):722-9.
8. Kargi E, Hosnuter M, Babucçu O, Altunkaya H, Altinyazar C. Effect of steroids on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2003;51(6):570-4.

9. Hoffmann DF, Cook TA, Quatela VC, Wang TD, Brownrigg PJ, Brummett RE. Steroids and rhinoplasty: a double-blind study. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 1991;117(9):990-3.
10. Tirelli G, Tofanelli M, Bullo F, Bianchi M, Robiony M. External osteotomy in rhinoplasty: Piezosurgery vs osteotome. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2015;36(5):666-71.
11. Szychta P, Antoszewski B. Assessment of early post-operative pain following septorhinoplasty. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2010;124(2):181-5
12. Giacomarra V, Russolo M, Arnez Z, Tirelli G. External osteotomy in rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope. 2001;111(3):433-8.
13. Tardy ME, Denneny JC. Micro-osteotomies in rhinoplasty–a technical refinement. Facial Plastic Surgery. 1984;1(02):137-45.
14. Becker DG, McLaughlin JR, Loevner LA, Mang A. The lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty: clinical and radiographic rationale for osteotome selection. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2000;105(5):1806-16; discussion 17-9.
15. Kienstra MA, Sherris DA, Kern EB. Osteotomy and pyramid modification in the Joseph and Cottle rhinoplasty. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 1999;7:279-94.
16. Ford CN, Battaglia DG, Gentry LR. Preservation of periosteal attachment in lateral osteotomy. Annals of plastic surgery. 1984;13(2):107-11.
17. Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2016;36(1):21-34.
18. Koçak İ, Doğan R, Gökler O. A comparison of piezosurgery with conventional techniques for internal osteotomy. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017;274(6):2483-91.
19. Taşkın Ü, Batmaz T, Erdil M, Aydın S, Yücebaş K. The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017;274(2):861-5.
20. Kara CO, Kara InG, Topuz B. Does creating a subperiosteal tunnel influence the periorbital edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty? Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2005;63(8):1088-90.
21. Robiony M, Franz L, Costa F, Bianchi A, Marchetti C. Piezosurgery: A true revolution for nasal bone osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2016;4(6).
22. Ilhan AE, Cengiz B, Caypinar Eser B. Double-blind comparison of ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy in terms of early postoperative edema and ecchymosis. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2016;36(4):390-401.
23. Koc B, Koc EAO, Erbek S. Comparison of clinical outcomes using a Piezosurgery device vs. a conventional osteotome for lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2017;96(8):318-26.
24. Troedhan A. Piezotome rhinoplasty reduces postsurgical morbidity and enhances patient satisfaction: a multidisciplinary clinical study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;74(8):1659. e1-e11.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Otorhinolaryngology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Erdal Rahman Koprucu ^*
Türkiye

Abdülcemal Ümit Işık
Türkiye

Osman Bahadır
Türkiye

Selçuk Arslan
Türkiye

Hatice Bengü Yaldız Çobanoğlu
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 23, 2025

Submission Date

November 17, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 16, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 8 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1825151

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA48KG97ME

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Koprucu, E. R., Işık, A. Ü., Bahadır, O., Arslan, S., & Yaldız Çobanoğlu, H. B. (2025). Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 8(3), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1825151

AMA

1.Koprucu ER, Işık AÜ, Bahadır O, Arslan S, Yaldız Çobanoğlu HB. Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2025;8(3):116-121. doi:10.65396/ejra.1825151

Chicago

Koprucu, Erdal Rahman, Abdülcemal Ümit Işık, Osman Bahadır, Selçuk Arslan, and Hatice Bengü Yaldız Çobanoğlu. 2025. “Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 8 (3): 116-21. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1825151.

EndNote

Koprucu ER, Işık AÜ, Bahadır O, Arslan S, Yaldız Çobanoğlu HB (December 1, 2025) Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 8 3 116–121.

IEEE

[1]E. R. Koprucu, A. Ü. Işık, O. Bahadır, S. Arslan, and H. B. Yaldız Çobanoğlu, “Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 116–121, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.65396/ejra.1825151.

ISNAD

Koprucu, Erdal Rahman - Işık, Abdülcemal Ümit - Bahadır, Osman - Arslan, Selçuk - Yaldız Çobanoğlu, Hatice Bengü. “Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 8/3 (December 1, 2025): 116-121. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1825151.

JAMA

1.Koprucu ER, Işık AÜ, Bahadır O, Arslan S, Yaldız Çobanoğlu HB. Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2025;8:116–121.

MLA

Koprucu, Erdal Rahman, et al. “Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 8, no. 3, Dec. 2025, pp. 116-21, doi:10.65396/ejra.1825151.

Vancouver

1.Erdal Rahman Koprucu, Abdülcemal Ümit Işık, Osman Bahadır, Selçuk Arslan, Hatice Bengü Yaldız Çobanoğlu. Postoperative Morbidity Outcomes of Conventional Versus Ultrasonic Osteotomy Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2025 Dec. 1;8(3):116-21. doi:10.65396/ejra.1825151