The Efficacy of Sphenopalatine Artery Cauterization with or without Ligation in Idiopathic Resistant Posterior Epistaxis

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 17 - 20, 29.05.2019

Hüseyin Barkın Yavuz Uygar Levent Demir Fikret Kasapoğlu

Abstract

Objective: Epistaxis is among the most common emergencies of ear, nose, and throat diseases. Although it can be controlled simply by applying ice and a local decongestant, more durable states and massive hemorrhage may affect the quality of life of the patient or even may be life-threatening accompanied by comorbid conditions. These types of resistant and massive hemorrhages, which we rarely encounter, are seen as posterior epistaxis. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the patients who had endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation and/or cauterization and were admitted to the Uludağ University School of Medicine Hospital Hospital ENT department with resistant idiopathic epistaxis and compare the pre-operative buffer and post-operative pain scores using a visual analog scale (vas).

Material and Methods: The patients who were admitted and hospitalized with epistaxis between 2014 and 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 60 patients were investigated. Cases with factors that may be involved in the etiology such as post-operative trauma, intranasal benign/malignant lesion, and bleeding diathesis were excluded in the first step. Patients who had been hospitalized with idiopathic resistant epistaxis but had not undergone transnasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation (TESPAL) and/or cauterization under general anesthesia were excluded. As a result, 10 patients were included in this study.

Results: In our study, the surgical success rate was found to be 100%. There was a significant difference between vas and post-operative vas in terms of pain during pre-operative tamponade.

Conclusion: TESPAL and/or cauterization seems to be an effective method. Its positive contribution to the morbidity and quality of life of the patient, as in our study, especially its effect on the level of pain, was evident when compared with conservative methods.

Keywords

Sphenopalatine artery , ligation , cauterization , epistaxis , posterior

References

• İsmi O, Vayisoğlu Y, Özcan C, Görür K, Ünal M. Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation in Posterior Epistaxis: Retrospective Analysis of 30 Patients. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 54: 47-52.
• Sireci F, Speciale R, Sorrentino R, Turri-Zanoni M, Nicolotti M, Canevari FR. Nasal packing in sphenopalatine artery bleeding: therapeutic or harmful? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274: 1501-5.
• Nikolaou G, Holzmann D, Soyka MB. Discomfort and costs in epistaxis treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 2239-44.
• Dutta M, Haldar D. Optimizing the outcome of transnasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation in managing refractory posterior epistaxis: A case-control analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017; 44: 554-60.
• Dedhia RC, Desai SS, Smith KJ, Lee S, Schaitkin BM, Snyderman CH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation versus nasal packing as first-line treatment for posterior epistaxis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013; 7: 563-6.
• Lam K, Luong A, Yao WC. Endoscopic management of anterior and posterior epistaxis. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngol 2017; 28: 198-203.
• Lin G, Bleier B. Surgical Management of Severe Epistaxis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016; 49: 627-37.
• McClurg SW, Carrau R. Endoscopic management of posterior epistaxis: a review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2014; 34: 1-8.
• Paul J, Kanotra SP, Kanotra S. Endoscopic Management of Posterior Epistaxis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 63: 141-4.
• McDermott AM, O'Cathain E, Carey BW, O'Sullivan P, Sheahan P. Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation for Epistaxis: Factors Influencing Outcome and Impact of Timing of Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 154: 547-52.
• Gan EC, Habib AR, Rajwani A, Javer AR. Five-degree, 10-degree, and 20-degree reverse Trendelenburg position during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4: 61-8.