Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 3, 58 - 62, 06.03.2019

Abstract

Objective: The nose is a common site for skin tumors because of its location on the face and it being exposed to sun. This study aimed to evaluate the tumor characteristics and reconstruction techniques in patients who underwent surgery for nasal skin tumors.

Material and Methods: Eighty-six patients who were operated in Manisa, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery between 2007 and 2017 were included in the study. The sociodemographic data, size, depth, volume, and histopathological type of the tumor; the reconstruction technique; and surgical outcomes were evaluated.

Results: The mean age of all patients was 64.8 years (range between 18 and 86 years). Among them, 45 patients were female, and 41 were male. Tumor histopathology was defined as basal cell carcinoma in 57 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 14 patients, malignant melanoma in one patient, and solar keratosis in three patients. Local and regional flaps were used in 57 patients, primary repair in 17 patients, skin grafts in eight patients, and other techniques in four patients. The paramedian forehead flap and the melolabial flap were the most common and the second most common flap techniques, respectively.

Conclusion: The most common histopathological type in nasal skin tumors is basal cell carcinoma. The nasal reconstruction technique should be individualized based on the size, and depth, and location of the defect that occurs after tumor excision.

References

  • Eskiizmir G, Baker S, Cingi C. Nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck: reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20: 493-513.
  • Eskiizmir G, Ozgur E, Temiz P, Gencoglan G, Ermertcan AT. The evaluation of tumor histopathology, location, characteristic, size and thickness of nonmelanoma skin cancers of the head and neck. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2012; 22: 91-8.
  • Eskiizmir G, Hırcın Z, Unlu H. A practical method for designing paramedian forehead flap: a preliminary report. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2010; 30: 1210-3.
  • Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Restoration of the face covering by means of selected skin in regional aesthetic units. Br J Plast Surg 1956; 9: 212-21.
  • Millard DR Jr. Aesthetic reconstructive rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1981; 8: 169-75.
  • Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 239-47.
  • Menick FJ. Artistry in aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic perception and the subunit principle. Clin Plast Surg 1987; 14: 723-35.
  • Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction-beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-yearreview of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 114: 1405-16.
  • Katalinic A, Kunze U, Schäfer T. Epidemiology ofcutaneous melanoma and non-melanoma skincancer in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany: incidence, clinical subtypes, tumour stages and localization (epidemiology of skin cancer). Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 1200-6.
  • Kasap Ş, Pektaş ML, Dere Y, Altıparmak M. Retrospective Evaluation of Skin Cancer Patients in Muğla. Medical Journal of Mugla Sitki Kocman University 2015; 2: 34-7.
  • Avcı G. Retrospective Analysis of Skin Cancers. Turk Plast Surg 2009; 17: 91-6.
  • Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001; 63: 8-18.
  • Miller DL, Weinstock MA. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30: 774-8.
  • Alam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 975-83.
  • Netscher DT, Leong M, OrengoI, Yang D, Berg C, Krishnan B. Cutaneous malignancies: melanoma and nonmelanoma types. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 37-56.
  • Kim HS, Cho EA, Bae JM, Yu DS, Oh ST, Kang H, et al. Recent trend in the incidence of premalignant and malignant skin lesions in Korea between 1991 and 2006. J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25: 924-9.
  • Choi KR, Lee JH, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH. Clinical study of facial skin cancers. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 24: 734-40.
  • Walling HW, Fosko SW, Geraminejad PA, Whitaker DC, Arpey CJ. Aggressive basal cell carcinoma: presentation, pathogenesis, and management. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2004; 23: 389-402.
  • Farasat S, Yu SS, Neel VA, Nehal KS, Lardaro T, Mihm MC, et al. A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systemfor cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: creation andrationale for inclusion of tumor characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64: 1051-9.
  • Breslow A. Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth ofinvasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 1970; 172: 902-8.
  • Khanna M, Fortier-Riberdy G, Smoller B, Dinehart S. Reporting tumor thickness for cutaneous squamous cellcarcinoma. J Cutan Pathol 2002; 29: 321-3.
  • Friedman RJ, Rigel DS, Kopf AW, Grin CM, Heilman E, Bart RS, et al. Volume of malignant melanoma is superior to thickness as a prognostic indicator. Preliminary observation. Dermatol Clin 1991; 9:643-8.
  • Binder M, Dolezal I, Wolff K, Pehamberger H. Stereologic estimation of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume as a predictor ofprognosis in ‘thin’ malignant melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 99: 180-3.
  • Mossbacher U, Knollmayer S, Binder M, Steiner A, Wolff K, Pehamberger H. Increasednuclear volume in metastasizing’thick’ melanomas. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106: 437-40.
  • Bahmer FA, Hantirah S, Baum HP. Rapid andunbiased estimation of the volume of cutaneousmalignant melanoma using Cavalieri’s principle. Am J Dermatopathol 1996; 18: 159-64.
  • Voss B, Wilop S, Jonas S, El-Komy MH, Schaller J, von Felbert V, et al. Tumor volume as a prognostic factor in resectable malignant melanoma. Dermatology 2014; 228: 66-70.
  • Gooding CA, White G, Yatsuhashi M. Significance of marginal extension in excised basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1965; 273: 923-4.
  • Eskiizmir G, Gençoğlan G, Temiz P, Hirçin Z, Ermertcan A. Staged-surgery with permanent pathology for the management of high-risk nonmelanoma skin cancer of the nose. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268: 117-21.
  • Paddack AC, Frank RW, Spencer HJ, Key JM, Vural E. Outcomes of paramedian forehead and nasolabial interpolation flaps in nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 138: 367-71.
  • Almeyda R, van der Eerden P, Vuyk H. Skin graft survival on subcutaneous hinge flaps: an algorithm for nasal reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2013; 123: 605-12.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Otorhinolaryngology
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Gökçe Tanyeri Toker 0000-0002-3023-0590

Peyker Temiz 0000-0001-6308-0157

Onur Dombaycı 0000-0003-1236-9908

Görkem Eskiizmir 0000-0002-3125-8288

Publication Date March 6, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 1 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Tanyeri Toker, G., Temiz, P., Dombaycı, O., Eskiizmir, G. (2019). The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 1(3), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2019.55
AMA Tanyeri Toker G, Temiz P, Dombaycı O, Eskiizmir G. The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. March 2019;1(3):58-62. doi:10.5152/ejra.2019.55
Chicago Tanyeri Toker, Gökçe, Peyker Temiz, Onur Dombaycı, and Görkem Eskiizmir. “The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 1, no. 3 (March 2019): 58-62. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2019.55.
EndNote Tanyeri Toker G, Temiz P, Dombaycı O, Eskiizmir G (March 1, 2019) The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 1 3 58–62.
IEEE G. Tanyeri Toker, P. Temiz, O. Dombaycı, and G. Eskiizmir, “The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 58–62, 2019, doi: 10.5152/ejra.2019.55.
ISNAD Tanyeri Toker, Gökçe et al. “The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 1/3 (March2019), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2019.55.
JAMA Tanyeri Toker G, Temiz P, Dombaycı O, Eskiizmir G. The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;1:58–62.
MLA Tanyeri Toker, Gökçe et al. “The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 1, no. 3, 2019, pp. 58-62, doi:10.5152/ejra.2019.55.
Vancouver Tanyeri Toker G, Temiz P, Dombaycı O, Eskiizmir G. The Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes in Skin Tumors of the Nose: Our Experience. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;1(3):58-62.

You can find the current version of the Instructions to Authors at: https://www.eurjrhinol.org/en/instructions-to-authors-104

Starting on 2020, all content published in the journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 International
License which allows third parties to use the content for non-commercial purposes as long as they give credit to the original work. This license
allows for the content to be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes, promoting the dissemination and use of the research published in
the journal.
The content published before 2020 was licensed under a traditional copyright, but the archive is still available for free access.