The Use Of Membrane Processes To Promote Sustainable Environmental Protection Practices

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 17 - 22, 25.02.2017

Abdullah Kızılet

Abstract

The aim of this study is to promote
membrane employment for sustainable environmental protection practices in terms
of retaining the depletion of natural resources at a grade less than their
proportion of renewal and consumption and employment of as much renewable
resources as possible instead of depletion of unrenewable resources.
Furthermore, information on life cycle assessment of products and manufacturing
systems is provided. Energy and water are the indispensable resources for the
mankind wealth. The increased energy needs arising from developing technologies,
increasing population and limited resources have led people to turn to
sustainable methods, especially in the case of limited water resources. There
has been growing rate of interest for biological wastewater treatment methods
by membrane employment. Separation of solid-liquid mixtures is implemented in
the way of biological wastewater treatment; especially MBRs have critical role
for treatment processes. MBR operations allow biological treatment and
disinfection without utilization of chemicals and the amount of produced sludge
is less due to unemployment of SRT. Although membrane technology still needs to
be improved regarding energy consumption, membrane and/or module manufacturing
costs, durableness and expertise, it has an important place in the energy-efficient
sustainable water supply, industrial wastewater management processes and energy
production. In addition to this, they are flexible and adaptable for module
modification and latest novelties. In literature, limited researches have been
practiced so far dealt with the issue of public acceptance of certain methods
being applied. Future research may focus on overcoming the issue of membrane
fouling, by devising methods for efficient cleaning, preferentially without
employment of dangerous chemicals, as well as by investigating new types of
membranes.

Keywords

Biological treatment, MBR, Renewable and sustainable environmental protection

References

• [1] W. E. Budd, R. W. Okey, Dorr-Oliver Inc. Membrane separation in biological-reactor systems, google pattent, US 3472765 A, 1969.
• [2] C. Chiemchaisri, Y. K. Wong, T. Urase, K. Yamamoto, Organic Stabilization and Nitrogen Removal in Membrane Separation Bioreactor for Domestic Wastewater Treatment. Water science and technology. 25 (10) 231-240, 1992.
• [3] P. Kumar,B. Imam,Footprintsofairpollutionandchangingenvironmentonthe sustainabilityofbuiltinfrastructure.Science of TotalEnvironment;444:85–101. 2013
• [4] C.DuPlessis,P. randon,AnecologicalworldviewasbasisforaregenerativeSustainabilityparadigmforthebuiltenvironment.J CleanProd, 2014.
• [5] N. Tangsubkul. S. J. Beavis, S. Moore,T. Lundie, D. Waite. Life Cycle Assessment of Water Recycling Technology, Water Resource Management 19: 521. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-5602-0. 2005
• [6] M. A. Ortiz-Rubio, E. R. Orskov, E. R, J. Milne, H. M. A. Galina, Effect of different sources of nitrogen on in situ degradability and feed intake of Zebu cattle fed sugarcane tops (Saccharumofficinarum). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 139 (3-4): 143–158. 2007
• [7] J.C. Pasqualino, M. Meneses, M. Abella, F. Castells. LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Science and Technology, 43 (9) ,pp. 3300–3307. 2009
• [8] F. A. Memon, Z. D. Butler, S. Smith. L.Makropoulos, Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Greywater Recycling Technologies for New Developments. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Volume 129, Issue 1, pp 27–35. 2007.
• [9] A. Hospidod, L. Corominas,L. Foley, J.S. Guest, H. F. Larsene,S. Morera,A. Shawg,Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: State of the art,Water Research, 47, 15, 5480–5492. 2013
• [10] T. B.Johansson, H. Kelly, A.K.N. Reddy and R. H.Williams " Renewable energy: sources for fuels and electricit, Earthscan. Island press, 1993.
• [11] John Twidelland Tony Weir. Renewable energy resources. Routledge, 2015.
• [12] Antonia V.Herzog, Timothy E. Lipman, Daniel M. Kammen. "Renewable energy sources." Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Forerunner Volume-‘Perspectives and Overview of Life Support Systems and Sustainable Development, 2001.
• [13] Ngoc Lieu Le and SuzanaP. Nunes. "Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability." Sustainable Materials and Technologies 7: 1-28, 2016.
• [14] B.E. Rittmann, Aerobic biological treatment. Environmental Science and Technology 21: 128—136, 1987.
• [15] C. Visvanathan, R. Ben Aim, K. Parameshwaran, ‘Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment’. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 30: 1—48, 2000.
• [16] LD Benefield and CW Randall, Biological Process Design for Wastewater Treatment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
• [17] Simon Judd, The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier, 2006.
• [18] Hee-DeungPark, In-Soung Chang,Kwang-Jin Lee. Principles of Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment. CRC Press, 2015.
• [19] TomStephenson, Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. IWA publishing, 2000.
• [20] S. Judd, B. Jefferson, Membranes for industrial wastewater recovery and re-use, Elsevier, Oxford, 2003.
• [21] G. Pearce, Introduction to membranes: Filtration for water and wastewater treatment. Filtration and Separation 44(2): 24—27, 2007.
• [22] He Y., Li G., Wang H., Jiang Z., Zhao J., Su H., Huang Q. Diafiltration and water recovery of reactive brilliant blue KN-R solution by two-stage membrane separation process. Chem Eng Process, 2010, vol. 49, pp. 476–483.
• [23] Moslehi, P., Shayegan, J., Bahrpayma, S. Iran. J. Performance of Membrane Bioreactor in Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater. Chem.Eng. 2008, vol. 5, pp.33–38 (IAChE).
• [24] Wen G.,Ma J., Zhang L., Yu G. Membrane Bioreactor in Water Treatment. Comprehensive Memb Sci and Eng,, 2010 vol. 4, pp. 195-209.
• [25] Demirbas A. Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Appl Energy 2011;88:17–28.
• [26] Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M. An overview of second generation biofueltechnologies. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:1570–80.
• [27] Costa JAV, de Morais MG. The role of biochemical engineering in the production of biofuelsfrom microalgae. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:2–9.
• [28] Y. He, D.M. Bagley, K.T. Leung et al., “Recent advances in membrane technologies for biorefining and bioenergy production,” Biotechnology Advances,vol. 30, pp. 817–858, 2012.
• [29] Judd S. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Treatment. Elsevier, Oxford (2011)
• [30] Lesjean B., Huisjes E.H. Survey of the European market: trends and perspectives, Desalination 231 (2008) 71-81
• [31] L. Defrance and M.Y. Jaffrin, “Comparison between filtrations at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment”, J. Membr. Sci., 152, 203–210, 1999.
• [32] E. Scholes, V. Verheyen, P. Brook-Carter, “A review of practical tools for rapid monitoring of membrane bioreactors”, Water Research, 102, 252-262, 2016.
• [33] Seo, G.T., Moon, B.H., Lee, T.S., Lim, T.J. and Kim, I.S. (2002). Non-woven fabric filter separation activated sludge reactor for domestic wastewater reclamation. Wat. Sci. Tech., 47(1), 133–138.
• [34] H. van der Roest, A. van Bentem, P. Schyns, C. Uijterlinde,. “Ten years of MBR development: lessons learned from the Netherlands,”Water 2117–23, 2012.
• [35] Fan, B., Huang, X., 2002. Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 5245–51.
• [36] J. Sun , K. Xiao, X. Yan, P. Liang, Y. Shen, X. Huang and N. Zhu,” Membrane bioreactor vs. oxidation ditch: full-scale long-term performance related with mixed liquor seasonal characteristics”, Process Biochemistry, 50, 2224–2233, 2015.
• [37] V.T. Kuberkar, R.H. Davis, Modeling of fouling reduction by secondary membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 168 (2000) 243–25
• [38] Lee, J., Ahn, W.Y., Lee, C.H., 2001. Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 35 (10), 435–2445.
• [39] E. Sahinkaya Nesrin Dursun Use of elemental sulfur and thiosulfate as electron sources for water denitrification Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 38, 531–541, 2015
• [40] Chu, H.Q., Cao, D., Jin, W., Dong, B.Z., 2008. Characteristics of bio-diatomite dynamic membrane process for municipal wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 325, 271–276.
• [41] K. Xiao, Y. Xu, S. Liang, T. Lei, J.Y. Sun, X.H. Wen, H.X. Zhang, C.S. Chen and X. Huang, “Engineering application of membrane bioreactor for wastewater Treatment in China: current state and future prospect”, Front. Env. Sci. Eng. 8, 805–819, 2014.
• [42] C. Visvanathan, R. Ben Aim, and K. Parameshwaran, “Membrane Separation Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment”, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 30(1),1–48, 2000.
• [43] Rashidi H., GhaffarianHoseini A.,GhaffarianHoseini A., Sulaiman N.M.N., Tookey J., Hashim N.A. Application of wastewater treatment in sustainable design of green built environments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, vol. 49, pp.845-856.