Alternate wetting and drying decreases arsenic content and increases yield of rice grown in organic matter amended soil

Abstract

Organic matter (OM) shows a critical role in mobilization and uptake of arsenic (As) by rice, and water management practice can mitigate this problem. However, very few research highlighted the impact of management of water on rice as influenced by OM amendment. Therefore, this study has evaluated the changes in As mobilization in paddy soil under different OM amendment and water management practices. Here, rice was grown to maturity in a two-factorial pot experiment comprising two different water management practices [continuous flooding (CF) and alternate wetting drying (AWD)] and eight combinations of As and OM amendment [comprising two As treatments (0 and 20 ppm) and four OM amendments (0, 0.25%, 0.5% and 5.0% w/w)]. Application of OM in As contaminated soil caused a significant increase in As accumulation in rice, and exhibited decreased growth and yield of rice. However, the results showed that rice growth and yield was significantly higher under AWD practice compared to CF. Arsenic concentration in rice was the lowest in As and OM control pots (44.67 µg/kg in AWD and 62.13 µg/kg in CF), and higher in As treated pots. Moreover, As concentration in rice grain increased with increasing levels of OM amendment. The As concentration in rice grain (168.44 µg/kg in AWD and 183.85 µg/kg in CF) was significantly higher in As treated pots with 0.5% OM amendment compared to other treatment combinations. Application of 5% OM in As contaminated soil did not produce any grains due to extreme toxicity. Thus, As accumulation in rice can be decreased by AWD water management technique without compromising yield. The findings suggest that applying OM in paddy soils with high soil As content should be done with caution.

Keywords

• Arsenic mobilization
• water management
• organic matter amendment
• rice

References

1. Abbas, F., Hammad, H.M., Ishaq, W., Farooque, A.A., Bakhat, H.F., Zia, Z., Fahad, S., Farhad, W., Cerdà, A., 2020. A review of soil carbon dynamics resulting from agricultural practices. Journal of Environmental Management 268: 110319.
2. Abbas, G., Murtaza, B., Bibi, I., Shahid, M., Niazi, N.K., Khan, M.I., Amjad, M., Hussain, M., Natasha, 2018. Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and speciation in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(1): 59.
3. Bouyoucos, G.J., 1926. Estimation of the colloidal material in soils. Science 64(1658): 362.
4. Bremner, J.M., Mulvaney, C.S., 1982. Nitrogen-Total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., (Eds.). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 595-624.
5. Harine, I.J., Islam, M.R., Hossain, M., Afroz, H., Jahan, R., Siddique, A.B., Uddin, S., Hossain, M.A., Alamri, S., Siddiqui, M.H., Henry, R.J., 2021. Arsenic accumulation in rice grain as influenced by water management: Human health risk assessment. Agronomy 11(9):1741.
6. Honma, T., Ohba, H., Kaneko-Kadokura, A., Makino, T., Nakamura, K., Katou, H., 2016. Optimal soil Eh, pH, and water management for simultaneously minimizing arsenic and cadmium concentrations in rice grains. Environmental Science & Technology 50(8): 4178-4185.
7. Hossain, M., Mestrot, A., Norton, G.J., Deacon, C., Islam, M.R., Meharg, A.A., 2021. Arsenic dynamics in paddy soil under traditional manuring practices in Bangladesh. Environmental Pollution 268: 115821.
8. Jackson, M.L., 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Chiffs, New York, USA. 498p.

9. Jahan, I., Abedin, M.A., Islam, M.R., Hossain, M., Hoque, T.S., Quadir, Q.F., Hossain, M.I., Gaber, A., Althobaiti, Y.S., Rahman, M.M., 2021. Translocation of soil arsenic towards accumulation in rice: magnitude of water management to minimize health risk. Water 13(20): 2816.
10. Kumarathilaka, P., Seneweera, S., Meharg, A., Bundschuh, J., 2018. Arsenic speciation dynamics in paddy rice soil-water environment: sources, physico-chemical, and biological factors-a review. Water Research 140: 403-414.
11. Li, C., Carrijo, D.R., Nakayama, Y., Linquist, B.A., Green, P.G., Parikh, S.J., 2019. Impact of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on arsenic uptake and speciation in flooded rice systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 272: 188-198.
12. Mondal, S., Dutta, P., Bandopadhyay, P., Maji, S., 2020. Arsenic contamination in major food crops: issues and mitigation in Indian subcontinent perspective. In: Agronomic Crops: Stress Responses and Tolerance. Hasanuzzaman, M. (Ed). Agronomic Crops. Springer, Singapore. pp.209-234.
13. Mubeen, K., Sarwar, N., Shehzad, M., Ghaffar, A., Aziz, M., 2022. Irrigation Management in Rice. In: Modern Techniques of Rice Crop Production. Sarwar, N., Atik-ur-Rehman, Ahmad, S., Hasanuzzaman, M., (Eds.). Springer Naure Singapore. pp. 105-114.
14. Murugaiyan, V., Zeibig, F., Anumalla, M., Siddiq, S.A., Frei, M., Murugaiyan, J., Ali, J., 2021. Arsenic stress responses and accumulation in rice. In: Rice Improvement: Physiological, Molecular Breeding and Genetic Perspectives. Jauhar, A., Wani, Shabir Hussain, W.S., (Eds.). Springer, Cham. pp. 281-313.
15. Najafi-Ghiri, M., Boostani, H.R., Hardie, A.G., 2023. Release of potassium from some heated calcareous soils to different solutions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 69(1): 90-103.
16. Olsen, S.R., 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, Circular No. 939. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. USA. 19p.
17. Rhaman, M.S., Kibria, M.G., Hoque, A., 2022. Climate change and ıts adverse ımpacts on plant growth in South Asia: Current status and upcoming challenges. Phyton 91(4): 695-711.
18. Rhaman, M.S., Kibria, M.G., Hossain, M., Hoque, M.A., 2016. Effects of organic manure and bio-slurries with chemical fertilizers on growth and yield of rice (cv. BRRI dhan28). International Journal of Experimental Agriculture 6(3): 36-42.
19. Roberts, L.C., Hug, S.J., Voegelin, A., Dittmar, J., Kretzschmar, R., Wehrli, B., Saha, G.C., Badruzzaman, A.B.M., Ali, M.A., 2011. Arsenic dynamics in porewater of an intermittently irrigated paddy field in Bangladesh. Environmental Science & Technology 45(3): 971-976.
20. Sarap, P.A., Hadole, S.S., Lakhe, S.R., Dhule, D.T., Parmar, J.N., 2020. Assessment of soil chemical properties, available sulphur and micronutrients status of soils in Pune district of Maharashtra. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 19(1): 100-104.
21. Sharma, P., Jha, A.B., Dubey, R.S., 2021. Arsenic toxicity and tolerance mechanisms in crop plants. In: Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. Pessarakli, M. (Ed.). CRC Press Boca Raton, pp. 813-873.
22. Upadhyay, M.K., Majumdar, A., Barla, A., Bose, S., Srivastava, S., 2019. An assessment of arsenic hazard in groundwater–soil–rice system in two villages of Nadia district, West Bengal, India. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 41: 2381-2395.
23. Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the digestion method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1):29-38.
24. Wang, M., Tang, Z., Chen, X.P., Wang, X., Zhou, W.X., Tang, Z., Zhang, J., Zhao, F.J., 2019. Water management impacts the soil microbial communities and total arsenic and methylated arsenicals in rice grains. Environmental Pollution 247: 736-744.
25. Xiao, Z., Xie, X., Pi, K., Gong, J., Wang, Y., 2021. Impact of organic matter on arsenic mobilization induced by irrigation in the unsaturated and saturated zones. Journal of Hydrology 602: 126821.
26. Zhang, J., Hamza, A., Xie, Z., Hussain, S., Brestic, M., Tahir, M.A., Ulhassan, Z., Yu, M., Allakhverdiev, S.I., Shabala, S., 2021. Arsenic transport and interaction with plant metabolism: Clues for improving agricultural productivity and food safety. Environmental Pollution 290: 117987.
27. Zhao, F.J., McGrath, S.P., Meharg, A.A., 2010. Arsenic as a food chain contaminant: mechanisms of plant uptake and metabolism and mitigation strategies. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61: 535-559.